Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

File - Legitimized Corruption Understood

Expand Messages
  • Sg_Review@yahoogroups.com
    http://www.aseannewsnetwork.com/2005/07/singapore-review-legitimized.html Thursday, July 21, 2005 Asean News Network: Legitimized Corruption Understood From:
    Message 1 of 120 , Aug 1, 2009
    View Source
    • 0 Attachment
      http://www.aseannewsnetwork.com/2005/07/singapore-review-legitimized.html

      Thursday, July 21, 2005
      Asean News Network: Legitimized Corruption Understood
      From: Carl Kapeland
      To: Mellanie Hewlitt
      #Article posted by Wolfgang Holzem / Erwan Shah @ 10:47 AM

      Dear Mellanie

      In the latest developments the entire National Kidney Foundation
      Board of Singapore and its CEO have taken the easy route out and
      resigned. That's leadership for you, when things get messy, just get
      up and leave the mess for someone else to clean up.

      But I don't think the new CEO or Board will do much cleaning up.
      Looks like they are replacing one bunch of rotten apples with another
      bunch of potentially more rotten apples. It does not address the real
      problem.

      WHAT IS THE REAL PROBLEM?
      There are several recurrent issues here. Singapore is in this current
      mess because Lee's PAP Government has forgotten that not everything
      can be reduced to money. You cannot throw money at all your problems
      and expect it to magically disappear.

      The material base that motivates Singapore's "leaders" is only too
      evident when the NKF's transit CEO (Gerald Ee) hinted
      that "SGD600,000/- may not be sufficient for the new replacement to
      take office"!!! Money is the only motivating factor and if they have
      elected a leader and a board who is motivated only by money, its only
      a natural and unavoidable result that they will end up with an
      organization which has forgotten its once noble purpose and replaced
      it with more materialistic pursuits.

      Have they (Singapore) appointed a Wolf in sheep's clothing to guard
      their precious flock? For positions like these in charity
      organizations, THE CHIEF MOTIVATING FACTOR CANNOT BE MONEY! as they
      are not running an investment bank.

      The same applies senior public service positions and for ministerial
      positions. NOT EVERYTHING CAN BE REDUCED TO MONEY. But Lee's PAP
      Ministers have used this holistic approach to address any and all
      issues under the sun.

      Lee and his ministers simply CANNOT RUN A COUNTRY THE SAME WAY THEY
      RUN A COMPANY. Why? Because a country comprises of flesh and blood
      and spirit. A company is merely a corporate vehicle that is often set-
      up for the sole purpose of reaping a monetary profit.

      SINGAPORE AS A COUNTRY, IS NOT SINGAPORE INC!!!! And even if it is,
      its directors (and that means Lee and his million dollar cabinet)
      have to remain accountable to the shareholders (Singapore citizens).
      Singapore MINISTERS have to be transparent, and they are not
      especially as regards their salaries and the management of the
      country's reserves.

      Consider this, the NKF was originally set up as a supposedly
      charitable organization. In form and function it appeared above board
      and reputable. But in actual practice it had a hidden agenda to
      siphon wealth from the public into state coffers. And what happens to
      all this money (all SGD200 million of it?) No body knows.

      These same similarities in the NKF saga are reproduced on a grander
      scale in overall state administration in Singapore. Whether its the
      CPF, LTA, GLCs, Temasek etc they all relate to the same basic
      issue. It goes back to the same bunch of corrupt leaders paying
      themselves and their cronies humongous ridiculous salaries, approved
      and legitimized under a set of bogus laws that they legislated in the
      first place.

      But even before this NKF scam, transparency issues have dogged
      Singapore's state administration for decades and repeated requests by
      the World Bank, IMF, FTA and other NGOs for greater accountability
      and transparency have basically fallen on deaf ears.

      These are basic transparency issues which plaque management of public
      moneys by all state entities (whether its the CPF Board, GLCs,
      Temasek, LTA etc). There is massive deception on a grand scale and I
      suspect the latest NKF debacle only surfaced due to internal friction
      within Singapore's "inner-circle of elite politicians." Perhaps
      someone amongst Singapore's Ruling Elite wanted a bigger portion of
      the loot.

      Think about it. Durai commenced his latest law suite on the confident
      assumption that it would be a "no contest" walk-over like his two
      previous suites. But whilst the Singapore sham courts had no problems
      finding in his favor in the 2 previous suites (which were taken
      against private individuals and a volunteer who correctly questioned
      his lavish spending), the latest suite was against another state
      bureaucracy.

      And it was inevitable that the sham court found in favor of the
      bigger devil. So even amongst the thieves there is a power struggle
      over who gets a bigger piece of the loot.

      So this then is justice ala Singapore styled. Who you are and who you
      are connected with ultimately decides the outcome of the law suite.

      The material facts of the case (and legal premise) have little
      relevance in the kangaroo court's final assessment.

      But by far the most troubling problem is that of Legitimized
      Corruption. You (Mellanie) have used the term "Legitimized
      Corruption" very accurately, but failed to elaborate on its true
      meaning and implications.

      Legitimized Corruption means essentially that the corrupt act itself
      is made perfectly legal. That is why there is a possibility that the
      external audit on NKF may turn out nothing because Durai and his
      actions may have been all perfectly legitimate and authorized
      according to the internal constitution of the Board.

      In a normal organization with bona fide controls in place, the Board
      would not have approved and allowed such unreasonable and lavish
      expenditures. However, in Singapore's setting where "anything goes"
      it is possible that the board were within their discretionary powers
      to authorize such lavish expenditures. Mind you these are
      expenditures which (by any ordinary definition) would have amounted
      to an immoral mis-management of public moneys for unauthorized
      applications. But if the internal rules of conduct of NKF allowed the
      Board to act in this manner, it would then be an authorized and
      legitimate act.

      So even after the process of audit has concluded it is perfectly
      possible for the auditors to conclude that the use of donor funds for;

      a) Durai's pay of SGD600,000 and his salary of SGD1.8 million;

      b) All expenses and application of donor funds used for purchase of
      SGD990/- god taps;

      c) All expenses for first class air travel;

      d) The levying of a 30% Admin Fee;

      e) The hiring of personal drivers and limos.

      All of the above are authorized and legitimate.

      Anyway we all know that the so called "audit" of the NKF accounts is
      merely a publicity stunt to show case to the world that the current
      government and the new board is taking steps to remain accountable.

      But does this make the above acts any more acceptable and morally
      correct. NO! Of cause not. An atrocity is still an atrocity even
      though it is legitimized.

      One clear example is prostitution in Singapore. It is legal and the
      fact that it is legal does not detract one iota from the fact that it
      is still immoral, depraved and inhuman.

      Of cause there are critics who will argue that moral values are to
      subjective concepts and we cannot always use these imprecise measures
      to define what is right or wrong. And I concede that there is some
      truth in this as we live in a world coloured in gray.

      However, there will always remain some acts which are so blatantly
      wrong that they remain morally objectionable and immoral by any
      standard and yardstick. And the NKF scam (as well as Singapore
      ministerial salaries) fall within this category. It is morally wrong
      by any measure and this is not a gray area at all.

      This same logic applies on a larger scale as regards ministerial
      salaries and the process that is orchestrated to "approve" such
      unreasonable and lavish salaries (amounting to millions of dollars
      per minister).

      Legitimized Corruption works much like Money Laundering, but is
      worse. In essence Legitimized Corruption is corruption which is made
      legal. These perpetrators attempt to do what drug cartels and money
      launderers do;- basically "launder" the money (or the dishonest act)
      and make the final product appear nice and clean.

      But senior politicians differ from your average drug lord or mafia
      boss in one important respect;- these ministers are much more
      sophisticated. They know the system (and probably designed it) and
      know how to manipulate and tweak the system so that they can have
      access to the ill-gotten gains without getting their hands dirty.

      Next to them, Gordon Gecko and the God-Father look like novices and
      vestal virgins.

      However make no mistake the underlying act itself remains wrong,
      dishonest and morally objectionable but is hidden under a cloak of
      legitimacy. Drug money (and money from dishonest trades) is still ill-
      gotten loot. Behind this elaborate sham are a host of corporate and
      state entities (GLCs, state owned entities and yes, charitable
      organizations) which are set-up to place a corporate veil between the
      real perpetrators and the morally objectionable and dishonest
      transaction.

      The fact that it is perfectly legitimate does not itself make it
      MORALLY CORRECT.

      This is especially the case when you have a legislature that is
      totally removed (and remains out of touch) with the moral values and
      aspirations of the people it is supposed to serve and protect.

      In fact, this kind of legitimized corruption is the worst possible
      kind as it means the corruption has infiltrated the most senior ranks
      of management (and the political leaders).

      Compared to this elaborate deceit, the more obvious corruption in
      Indonesia are crude by comparison and far easier to identify and
      correct as it is acknowledged that such objectionable acts itself are
      WRONG and are not endorsed by the country's laws.

      How do you ask a cop to catch a thief when the cop himself is a
      thief?

      Legitimized Corruption by its very nature is more sinister and
      difficult to identify. For instance, a government official who
      accepts bribes worth $1.6 million a year is guilty of corruption. But
      what happens if this same official or minister receives this money as
      part of his "LEGITIMATE" salary.

      In both cases the act itself is the same unconscionable and immoral
      act. But in the later case, there is no need for the official to hide
      his ill-gotten gains as it is
      formally endorsed by an equally corrupt legislature/parliament who
      has a hand in the ill gotten gains.

      The definition of a Parasitic Leech is as follows: "leech: a follower
      who hangs around a host (without benefit to the host) in hope of gain
      or advantage"

      The kind of legitimized corruption already endorsed and prevalent in
      Singapore's state machinery is far worse. It is a cancerous malice
      which is more surreptitious and insidious.

      The festering rot is not immediately apparent to an external casual
      observer but is eating away the core of the its host. Left unchecked,
      such parasites will consume a once healthy body before discarding the
      empty shell and relocating to another unwary host.

      Legitimized Corruption is also like cancer. It is a chronic ailment
      which rooted itself very deeply within the host (and the state
      machinery). Such a chronic ailment did not occur over night but took
      place over decades of accumulated unchecked accesses.

      Durai himself was in the NKF for over 30 years and it is no mere
      coincidence that
      Singapore has been under the same government (and people and family)
      for over 30 years.

      This is precisely the reason why in the US and other bona fide
      democracies there is a mandatory change in administration every 4-8
      years. A new administration brings forth a completely new government
      which will was away unchecked accesses and commence things tabula
      rasa.

      But somehow in Singapore it appears that only families starting with
      the Lee surname or who are closely affiliated with this first family
      are the only candidates who qualify for election.

      What a quaint and family friendly arrangement! Its just too bad that
      the average
      Singaporean is excluded from this elitist inner-circle.

      However, Singapore's Ruling Elite also have to be wary of the
      accompanying dangers of in-breeding which can occur from a small and
      exclusive gene pool. Cancerous deformities can result after
      generations of in-breeding.

      And the Cancer has many signs and symptoms. There have already been
      many evident tell tale signs of the internal rot and its accompanying
      putrid stench. However, Singaporeans in their numbed state of
      awareness may be mistaking the over-powering stench of decay for
      sweet perfume.

      The entire state machinery is orchestrated to maintain this state of
      illusion and deception.

      In the normal mechanics of an open and transparent state legislature
      and government, the moral values of the mans on the street is
      reflected (although not perfectly) in the policy formulation process.

      This is not the case in Singapore and your "leaders" know it. Just
      challenge them to run a referendum regarding their salaries and it
      will be evident that 90% of the population are totally disgusted by
      such blatant acts of greed.

      Of cause the local state owned media will somehow always paint the
      picture of an adoring and obedient public as part of an elaborate
      charade. So the truth never ever gets out.

      Corruption of this scale starts form the top and slowly works its way
      down the ranks to pollute every senior arm of the state machinery
      from the Judiciary to Legislature to the Executive and especially to
      a docile and compliant state managed local press.

      It cannot be stopped easily without external intervention.

      Slowly but surely what started off as a morally unacceptable issue
      becomes part and parcel of "accepted norm" which is disguised behind
      a pile of state endorsed laws and bills.

      Even the once sacred document, the Constitution, is not spared and is
      re-written to the whims and fancies of those they serve. How many
      Singaporeans are aware of the fact that the country's Constitution has
      been amended to allow state owned entities and GLCs easier access
      directly to the country's reserves?

      And it also does not take a genius to work out that it is the close
      affiliates of the Ruling Elite who sit on the management boards of
      these state owned entities and GLCs.

      The following is a fascinating observation. The exact size of
      Singapore's foreign exchange reserves and the management of those
      funds is designated as a STATE SECURITY FOR INTERNAL SECURITY REASONS.

      Is it mere co-incidence that the conservative ball park estimate of
      the net worth of the Lee family is roughly equivalent to your
      country's reserves? (USD130-140 billion?)

      What you have in Singapore are a bunch of hired mercenaries who are
      ripping off the very people they are supposed to look after.

      Singaporeans. This is your country and your life. If you continue in
      this state of drugged apathy, you will cease to have any control over
      your own faith and destiny.

      Do you really want to hand over your life to the devil?

      Do you want to have a Singapore with No Singaporeans?

      Its time to wake up from your state of denial and confront the harsh
      reality before your very eyes.

      Yours faithfully
      Carl Kapeland
      Ohio State

      #Article posted by Wolfgang Holzem / Erwan Shah @ 10:47 AM
      http://www.aseannewsnetwork.com/2005/07/singapore-review-legitimized.html
    • Sg_Review@yahoogroups.com
      http://www.aseannewsnetwork.com/2005/07/singapore-review-legitimized.html Thursday, July 21, 2005 Asean News Network: Legitimized Corruption Understood From:
      Message 120 of 120 , Apr 13 4:24 AM
      View Source
      • 0 Attachment
        http://www.aseannewsnetwork.com/2005/07/singapore-review-legitimized.html

        Thursday, July 21, 2005
        Asean News Network: Legitimized Corruption Understood
        From: Carl Kapeland
        To: Mellanie Hewlitt
        #Article posted by Wolfgang Holzem / Erwan Shah @ 10:47 AM

        Dear Mellanie

        In the latest developments the entire National Kidney Foundation
        Board of Singapore and its CEO have taken the easy route out and
        resigned. That's leadership for you, when things get messy, just get
        up and leave the mess for someone else to clean up.

        But I don't think the new CEO or Board will do much cleaning up.
        Looks like they are replacing one bunch of rotten apples with another
        bunch of potentially more rotten apples. It does not address the real
        problem.

        WHAT IS THE REAL PROBLEM?
        There are several recurrent issues here. Singapore is in this current
        mess because Lee's PAP Government has forgotten that not everything
        can be reduced to money. You cannot throw money at all your problems
        and expect it to magically disappear.

        The material base that motivates Singapore's "leaders" is only too
        evident when the NKF's transit CEO (Gerald Ee) hinted
        that "SGD600,000/- may not be sufficient for the new replacement to
        take office"!!! Money is the only motivating factor and if they have
        elected a leader and a board who is motivated only by money, its only
        a natural and unavoidable result that they will end up with an
        organization which has forgotten its once noble purpose and replaced
        it with more materialistic pursuits.

        Have they (Singapore) appointed a Wolf in sheep's clothing to guard
        their precious flock? For positions like these in charity
        organizations, THE CHIEF MOTIVATING FACTOR CANNOT BE MONEY! as they
        are not running an investment bank.

        The same applies senior public service positions and for ministerial
        positions. NOT EVERYTHING CAN BE REDUCED TO MONEY. But Lee's PAP
        Ministers have used this holistic approach to address any and all
        issues under the sun.

        Lee and his ministers simply CANNOT RUN A COUNTRY THE SAME WAY THEY
        RUN A COMPANY. Why? Because a country comprises of flesh and blood
        and spirit. A company is merely a corporate vehicle that is often set-
        up for the sole purpose of reaping a monetary profit.

        SINGAPORE AS A COUNTRY, IS NOT SINGAPORE INC!!!! And even if it is,
        its directors (and that means Lee and his million dollar cabinet)
        have to remain accountable to the shareholders (Singapore citizens).
        Singapore MINISTERS have to be transparent, and they are not
        especially as regards their salaries and the management of the
        country's reserves.

        Consider this, the NKF was originally set up as a supposedly
        charitable organization. In form and function it appeared above board
        and reputable. But in actual practice it had a hidden agenda to
        siphon wealth from the public into state coffers. And what happens to
        all this money (all SGD200 million of it?) No body knows.

        These same similarities in the NKF saga are reproduced on a grander
        scale in overall state administration in Singapore. Whether its the
        CPF, LTA, GLCs, Temasek etc they all relate to the same basic
        issue. It goes back to the same bunch of corrupt leaders paying
        themselves and their cronies humongous ridiculous salaries, approved
        and legitimized under a set of bogus laws that they legislated in the
        first place.

        But even before this NKF scam, transparency issues have dogged
        Singapore's state administration for decades and repeated requests by
        the World Bank, IMF, FTA and other NGOs for greater accountability
        and transparency have basically fallen on deaf ears.

        These are basic transparency issues which plaque management of public
        moneys by all state entities (whether its the CPF Board, GLCs,
        Temasek, LTA etc). There is massive deception on a grand scale and I
        suspect the latest NKF debacle only surfaced due to internal friction
        within Singapore's "inner-circle of elite politicians." Perhaps
        someone amongst Singapore's Ruling Elite wanted a bigger portion of
        the loot.

        Think about it. Durai commenced his latest law suite on the confident
        assumption that it would be a "no contest" walk-over like his two
        previous suites. But whilst the Singapore sham courts had no problems
        finding in his favor in the 2 previous suites (which were taken
        against private individuals and a volunteer who correctly questioned
        his lavish spending), the latest suite was against another state
        bureaucracy.

        And it was inevitable that the sham court found in favor of the
        bigger devil. So even amongst the thieves there is a power struggle
        over who gets a bigger piece of the loot.

        So this then is justice ala Singapore styled. Who you are and who you
        are connected with ultimately decides the outcome of the law suite.

        The material facts of the case (and legal premise) have little
        relevance in the kangaroo court's final assessment.

        But by far the most troubling problem is that of Legitimized
        Corruption. You (Mellanie) have used the term "Legitimized
        Corruption" very accurately, but failed to elaborate on its true
        meaning and implications.

        Legitimized Corruption means essentially that the corrupt act itself
        is made perfectly legal. That is why there is a possibility that the
        external audit on NKF may turn out nothing because Durai and his
        actions may have been all perfectly legitimate and authorized
        according to the internal constitution of the Board.

        In a normal organization with bona fide controls in place, the Board
        would not have approved and allowed such unreasonable and lavish
        expenditures. However, in Singapore's setting where "anything goes"
        it is possible that the board were within their discretionary powers
        to authorize such lavish expenditures. Mind you these are
        expenditures which (by any ordinary definition) would have amounted
        to an immoral mis-management of public moneys for unauthorized
        applications. But if the internal rules of conduct of NKF allowed the
        Board to act in this manner, it would then be an authorized and
        legitimate act.

        So even after the process of audit has concluded it is perfectly
        possible for the auditors to conclude that the use of donor funds for;

        a) Durai's pay of SGD600,000 and his salary of SGD1.8 million;

        b) All expenses and application of donor funds used for purchase of
        SGD990/- god taps;

        c) All expenses for first class air travel;

        d) The levying of a 30% Admin Fee;

        e) The hiring of personal drivers and limos.

        All of the above are authorized and legitimate.

        Anyway we all know that the so called "audit" of the NKF accounts is
        merely a publicity stunt to show case to the world that the current
        government and the new board is taking steps to remain accountable.

        But does this make the above acts any more acceptable and morally
        correct. NO! Of cause not. An atrocity is still an atrocity even
        though it is legitimized.

        One clear example is prostitution in Singapore. It is legal and the
        fact that it is legal does not detract one iota from the fact that it
        is still immoral, depraved and inhuman.

        Of cause there are critics who will argue that moral values are to
        subjective concepts and we cannot always use these imprecise measures
        to define what is right or wrong. And I concede that there is some
        truth in this as we live in a world coloured in gray.

        However, there will always remain some acts which are so blatantly
        wrong that they remain morally objectionable and immoral by any
        standard and yardstick. And the NKF scam (as well as Singapore
        ministerial salaries) fall within this category. It is morally wrong
        by any measure and this is not a gray area at all.

        This same logic applies on a larger scale as regards ministerial
        salaries and the process that is orchestrated to "approve" such
        unreasonable and lavish salaries (amounting to millions of dollars
        per minister).

        Legitimized Corruption works much like Money Laundering, but is
        worse. In essence Legitimized Corruption is corruption which is made
        legal. These perpetrators attempt to do what drug cartels and money
        launderers do;- basically "launder" the money (or the dishonest act)
        and make the final product appear nice and clean.

        But senior politicians differ from your average drug lord or mafia
        boss in one important respect;- these ministers are much more
        sophisticated. They know the system (and probably designed it) and
        know how to manipulate and tweak the system so that they can have
        access to the ill-gotten gains without getting their hands dirty.

        Next to them, Gordon Gecko and the God-Father look like novices and
        vestal virgins.

        However make no mistake the underlying act itself remains wrong,
        dishonest and morally objectionable but is hidden under a cloak of
        legitimacy. Drug money (and money from dishonest trades) is still ill-
        gotten loot. Behind this elaborate sham are a host of corporate and
        state entities (GLCs, state owned entities and yes, charitable
        organizations) which are set-up to place a corporate veil between the
        real perpetrators and the morally objectionable and dishonest
        transaction.

        The fact that it is perfectly legitimate does not itself make it
        MORALLY CORRECT.

        This is especially the case when you have a legislature that is
        totally removed (and remains out of touch) with the moral values and
        aspirations of the people it is supposed to serve and protect.

        In fact, this kind of legitimized corruption is the worst possible
        kind as it means the corruption has infiltrated the most senior ranks
        of management (and the political leaders).

        Compared to this elaborate deceit, the more obvious corruption in
        Indonesia are crude by comparison and far easier to identify and
        correct as it is acknowledged that such objectionable acts itself are
        WRONG and are not endorsed by the country's laws.

        How do you ask a cop to catch a thief when the cop himself is a
        thief?

        Legitimized Corruption by its very nature is more sinister and
        difficult to identify. For instance, a government official who
        accepts bribes worth $1.6 million a year is guilty of corruption. But
        what happens if this same official or minister receives this money as
        part of his "LEGITIMATE" salary.

        In both cases the act itself is the same unconscionable and immoral
        act. But in the later case, there is no need for the official to hide
        his ill-gotten gains as it is
        formally endorsed by an equally corrupt legislature/parliament who
        has a hand in the ill gotten gains.

        The definition of a Parasitic Leech is as follows: "leech: a follower
        who hangs around a host (without benefit to the host) in hope of gain
        or advantage"

        The kind of legitimized corruption already endorsed and prevalent in
        Singapore's state machinery is far worse. It is a cancerous malice
        which is more surreptitious and insidious.

        The festering rot is not immediately apparent to an external casual
        observer but is eating away the core of the its host. Left unchecked,
        such parasites will consume a once healthy body before discarding the
        empty shell and relocating to another unwary host.

        Legitimized Corruption is also like cancer. It is a chronic ailment
        which rooted itself very deeply within the host (and the state
        machinery). Such a chronic ailment did not occur over night but took
        place over decades of accumulated unchecked accesses.

        Durai himself was in the NKF for over 30 years and it is no mere
        coincidence that
        Singapore has been under the same government (and people and family)
        for over 30 years.

        This is precisely the reason why in the US and other bona fide
        democracies there is a mandatory change in administration every 4-8
        years. A new administration brings forth a completely new government
        which will was away unchecked accesses and commence things tabula
        rasa.

        But somehow in Singapore it appears that only families starting with
        the Lee surname or who are closely affiliated with this first family
        are the only candidates who qualify for election.

        What a quaint and family friendly arrangement! Its just too bad that
        the average
        Singaporean is excluded from this elitist inner-circle.

        However, Singapore's Ruling Elite also have to be wary of the
        accompanying dangers of in-breeding which can occur from a small and
        exclusive gene pool. Cancerous deformities can result after
        generations of in-breeding.

        And the Cancer has many signs and symptoms. There have already been
        many evident tell tale signs of the internal rot and its accompanying
        putrid stench. However, Singaporeans in their numbed state of
        awareness may be mistaking the over-powering stench of decay for
        sweet perfume.

        The entire state machinery is orchestrated to maintain this state of
        illusion and deception.

        In the normal mechanics of an open and transparent state legislature
        and government, the moral values of the mans on the street is
        reflected (although not perfectly) in the policy formulation process.

        This is not the case in Singapore and your "leaders" know it. Just
        challenge them to run a referendum regarding their salaries and it
        will be evident that 90% of the population are totally disgusted by
        such blatant acts of greed.

        Of cause the local state owned media will somehow always paint the
        picture of an adoring and obedient public as part of an elaborate
        charade. So the truth never ever gets out.

        Corruption of this scale starts form the top and slowly works its way
        down the ranks to pollute every senior arm of the state machinery
        from the Judiciary to Legislature to the Executive and especially to
        a docile and compliant state managed local press.

        It cannot be stopped easily without external intervention.

        Slowly but surely what started off as a morally unacceptable issue
        becomes part and parcel of "accepted norm" which is disguised behind
        a pile of state endorsed laws and bills.

        Even the once sacred document, the Constitution, is not spared and is
        re-written to the whims and fancies of those they serve. How many
        Singaporeans are aware of the fact that the country's Constitution has
        been amended to allow state owned entities and GLCs easier access
        directly to the country's reserves?

        And it also does not take a genius to work out that it is the close
        affiliates of the Ruling Elite who sit on the management boards of
        these state owned entities and GLCs.

        The following is a fascinating observation. The exact size of
        Singapore's foreign exchange reserves and the management of those
        funds is designated as a STATE SECURITY FOR INTERNAL SECURITY REASONS.

        Is it mere co-incidence that the conservative ball park estimate of
        the net worth of the Lee family is roughly equivalent to your
        country's reserves? (USD130-140 billion?)

        What you have in Singapore are a bunch of hired mercenaries who are
        ripping off the very people they are supposed to look after.

        Singaporeans. This is your country and your life. If you continue in
        this state of drugged apathy, you will cease to have any control over
        your own faith and destiny.

        Do you really want to hand over your life to the devil?

        Do you want to have a Singapore with No Singaporeans?

        Its time to wake up from your state of denial and confront the harsh
        reality before your very eyes.

        Yours faithfully
        Carl Kapeland
        Ohio State

        #Article posted by Wolfgang Holzem / Erwan Shah @ 10:47 AM
        http://www.aseannewsnetwork.com/2005/07/singapore-review-legitimized.html
      Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.