Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Singapore public healthcare since 1981: From 3rd world to ...3rd world? (hentak kaki...)

Expand Messages
  • Jeffrey Ho
    Dr Dana Elliott Srither : ....If nothing drastic is done now, I doubt there will be any change even 10 years or more from today. 1. Today, 30 June 2005 - 25
    Message 1 of 1 , Jun 29, 2006
      Dr Dana Elliott Srither : "....If nothing drastic is done now, I doubt there will be any change
      even 10 years or more from today."
      1. Today, 30 June 2005 - "25 years on, the long queues remain"
      2. Today, 29 June 2005 - "Why those long polyclinic lines pose a health threat"
      To: Feedback Unit
      cc: Amy Khor - Chairman, Feedback Unit
      cc: Mr Khaw Boon Wan - Health Minister
      cc: Opposition MPs
      cc: sg_review
      cc: Today (for publication)
      cc: Today - Ms Tan Hui Leng
      cc: Straits Times
      30 June 2006
      Dr Dana Srither's words could well prove to be prophetic 10 or 20 years from now.
      Is it any wonder then when the Singapore government spends less than 1% of its
      GDP on public healthcare, much less than the average of 6% for 1st world countries?
      (refer to the research article published in 2003, "Shifting the burden of health care finance:
      a case study of public-private partnership in Singapore" by Lim Meng-Kim (refer link for
      details - www.healthpolicymonitor.org/ Downloads/healthcare_financing.pdf ).
      How then can the PAP government ever, ever claim to be 1st world when the situation has hardly
      changed the last 25 years (mind you, this dates back to the days of Minister Mentor Lee
      Kuan Yew, no less). It might have been reasonably expected 25 years ago to accept
      such inefficiencies (Singapore was probably still 2nd world, somewhere between 3rd
      and 1st world), but now that it is purportedly 1st world? Probably the only change is the
      hardware (plasma TVs, anyone? - it will at least make the long wait more tolerable), not
      software nor heartware.
      What's worse is instead of getting cured, one may end up dead while visiting public polyclinics,
      as in the recent case at Clementi Polyclinic!
      So, what "drastic" action will the Ministry of Health undertake to prove Dr Srither's prophecy
      25 years on, the long queues remain
      Dr Dana Elliott Srither
      when I was young, my medical condition was managed by a polyclinic doctor in the east, because my parents were civil servants.
      I remember my mother telling me to "get a number" very early in the morning, then come home for breakfast before going back to rejoin the queue closer to opening time.
      I remember the crowds, some patients sitting on old wooden benches, but most standing on mosaic-tiled floors.
      Hours later, my name would be called out by the nurse. After the consultation with the doctor, I would have to wait just as long for my medications to be dispensed at the pharmacy.
      Fast-forward to 15 years later.
      When I was a third-year medical student, I was ill one day and wanted to find out if there were any improvements in the polyclinic system.
      I headed to a polyclinic in the central region at about 8am. I was disappointed and swore I would never visit another polyclinic when I am ill.
      I was seated in the midst of people coughing and sneezing, but this time on better benches with electronic numbers flashed on large screens. By the time I left the polyclinic, it was close to noon.
      Fast-forward again, 10 years later.
      Recently, I asked one of my former classmates now working as a polyclinic family physician if there was any improvement in their situation. She told me even though they have tried to improve the efficiency in the system, results seemed to be marginal at best.
      Another doctor who just went into private practice told me that in the polyclinic she dealt mainly with chronic disease cases. She had hardly any time or chance to deal with other aspects of acute family medicine, such as suturing of cuts and lacerations from trauma.
      No wonder our emergency departments are overwhelmed as well!
      My father-in-law is a diabetic patient, and was seen by the polyclinic for many years until recently. When I asked him why he stopped seeking treatment there, he answered that most of the time, the doctors were not Singaporeans and could not communicate in Hokkien.
      A recent Primary Care Survey in 2005 revealed that 21 per cent of patients patronising polyclinics stay in one to three-room flats and presumably require health subsidies.
      This proportion is slightly higher than the 21 per cent (staying in the same flat types) who visited private family doctors.
      Some residents in my neighbourhood stay in houses larger than my humble five-room HDB flat, and they tell me they go to the polyclinic for their disease management.
      I asked why they were willing to wait in the long queues, and their common answer was: "I am a retiree, so I have time."
      With the recent case of an elderly woman's death, I wonder if there will be any improvement in the situation.
      It is now more than 20 years from my first experience as a patient in the polyclinic. If nothing drastic is done now, I doubt there will be any change even 10 years or more from today.
      This is contributed by a reader, a medical doctor.
      Posted: 29 June 2006 1121 hrs

      Why those long polyclinic lines pose a health threat
      By Tan Hui Leng, TODAY
      Think queuing up for a copy of this newspaper is a drag? Try joining a similar queue when you're sick — outside a polyclinic.

      The wait could stretch for hours, and might go some way towards explaining exactly why the frazzled staff at Clementi Polyclinic ended up giving the wrong dosage of heart medicine to an 88-year-old woman, who eventually died.

      While recording an open verdict on the case, the State Coroner on Tuesday heard testimonies from pharmacy staff who spoke of the daily crush they faced.

      Even when a doctor changed a prescription, they could not afford to wait for the amended slip to reach them. Instead, they issued the medicine first — the amended slip could take up to two hours to reach them.

      "Of course we'd prefer to wait," said Mr Ja'al Maaruf. "But we can't force the doctor (to hurry up) and we serve hundreds of patients."

      Even though the possibility of a mistake in such situations cannot be ruled out, the staff have no choice as patients clamour to be served. The culprit, it appears, is the sheer load the polyclinics face.

      Officially, they open at 8am.

      "The queue starts before the clinic opens for registration," a former polyclinic doctor told Today. "It's like queueing for National Day Parade tickets at some polyclinics — people leave their slippers or belongings to 'chope' (reserve) the spot, go for the coffee, get a newspaper and then return nearer to opening time.

      "It's not just in the morning. When we close for lunch, we see people queueing for the afternoon session."

      Patients who arrive later are often subjected to long queues and the wait can be as long as four hours.

      Official figures from SingHealth Polyclinics show that bigger polyclinics see about 930 patients a day with 15 doctors serving them; this works out to 62 patients per doctor a day. At smaller SingHealth polyclinics, it's about 56 patients per doctor a day. At the National Healthcare Group (NHG), this number is 60.

      The numbers are higher than the average of 40 a day at a busy private GP practice.

      During peak seasons, some doctors said they could see up to 100 patients a day — all within seven-and-a-half hours.

      The pharmacy staff were equally hard-pressed. Serving more than 900 patients each day at the bigger SingHealth polyclinics are 10 to 12 pharmacy employees.

      They are supposed to be the second line of defence in checking a doctor's prescription. But sometimes, sheer numbers can overwhelm them. Communication lines can get crossed.

      In the case of Madam Koh Ah Tow whose case was heard by the coroner, the doctor said she had changed the dosage after a call from the pharmacy. However, two pharmacy technicians who packed and issued the medicine denied receiving the instruction. Madam Koh died 10 weeks later.

      At SingHealth Polyclinics, some two to three amendments are made per day at each polyclinic. At the NHG, there are two to four a day at each polyclinic.

      In an email reply to Today, SingHealth said that alterations are documented in the prescription and endorsed by the doctor. They are also recorded in the patient's case notes.

      Over at NHG, doctors now need to make amendments in black and white and not just over the phone. But as patients refuse to wait for the amendments to arrive in writing, it is possible for the wrong dosage of medicine to be dispensed.

      "We are humans and there is a limit to how much you can do with just one hand, one mouth and one pair of hands," said the former Polyclinic doctor.

      "But you just can't turn patients away if they are there to see you." -

      Copyright © 2006 MCN International Pte Ltd
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.