Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.
 

NSP Expresses its concerns on the NKF and other charitable organization

Expand Messages
  • syntaxerreur
    From: Steve Chia [mailto:stevechia@singnet.com.sg] Sent: 15 July 2005 12:56 To: lee_hsien_loong@pmo.gov.sg ; khaw_boon_wan@moh.gov.sg ; v_bala@ mcys.gov.sg
    Message 1 of 1 , Jul 17, 2005
      From: Steve Chia [mailto:stevechia@...]
      Sent: 15 July 2005 12:56
      To: 'lee_hsien_loong@...'; 'khaw_boon_wan@...'; 'v_bala@
      mcys.gov.sg'
      Cc: 'reporting@...'; 'npops@...'; 'streats@sph.
      com.sg'; 'news@...'; 'Roberto.Coloma@...'; 'Bloomberg
      @...'; 'stforum@...'; 'zbzz@...'; 'pohst@sph.c
      om.sg'; 'stpolitical@...'; 'btnews@...'; 'aadeska@...
      m.sg'; 'zblocal@...'; 'wanbao@...'; 'shinmin@...'
      ; 'singapore.newsroom@...'; 'nsp-cec@yahoogroups.com'
      Subject: NSP Expresses its concerns on the NKF and other charitable
      organization
      Importance: High

      15 July 05

      To: Mr Lee Hsien Loong
      The Prime Minister

      Mr Khaw Boon Wan
      The Minister for Health,

      Dr Vivian Balakrishnan
      The Minister for Community Development, Youth and Sports

      Cc: All local mass media
      Singapore

      NSP Expresses its concerns on the NKF and other charitable
      organization

      The sordid revelation in court of the less than judicious management
      of public donation by the National Kidney Foundation (NKF) has
      immensely outraged the the people of this nation. In view of the
      incident, the NSP would like to raise the following points.

      1. Having severely undermined its trustworthiness by the current
      CEO and board, the new NKF board (expected to be constituted with
      help from the Government) must now promptly atone for its past
      conduct. Measures expected of NKF must necessarily include a channel
      of reimbursement to the disgruntled benefactors who so demand to have
      their money back. We expect NKF to comprehensively publicise the
      availability of such a channel, and diffuse a satisfactory statement
      to the public and especially to the people who had in one way or
      another literally rendered their sweat and blood to the success of
      NKF's donation campaigns.

      2. The misdeeds of NKF will indirectly raise spontaneous
      suspicions on donation drive of other charity organisations. To allay
      uncertainties in the minds of donors, and to prevent concealment of
      excesses of the kind practised by NKF, all other charity
      organisations that raises large amount of money from the public
      should henceforth proactively step forward with transparent and
      convincing measure to regain the trust of the public, and rescue
      themselves from the inevitable stigmatisation. These measures must
      include a greater disclosure on expenditure and allocation of
      donation funds, number of beneficiaries and the process of fund
      allocation and subsidies, and to review and introduce more cost-
      effective measures to justify continual public support.

      3. The government should wisely reconsider the adoption of
      mandatory disclosure on the pay and perks of the executive and board
      members who draw their remuneration in part or in whole from the
      donation fund.

      This recommendation was previously discarded by the Council on
      Governance of Institutions of a Public Character (IPC) in May this
      year. In light of the NKF-incident, it is now evidently untenable to
      argue that such a public disclosure is a "private matter"
      which "could discourage qualified professionals from joining the
      management of IPCs".

      4. The government should also seek to lower the threshold of the
      total annual income requiring IPCs to comply with Financial Reporting
      Standards from $10 million back to the recommended $5 million to
      promote transparency in lieu of the consideration of "compliance
      costs".

      Auditors of charity organisations should also play an active social
      role by alerting the relevant authority over suspicions of misuse of
      such public fund. This would help to advance Singapore to become an
      exemplary model of accountability and transparency in the domain of
      public financial management.

      5. Lastly, the public should be educated to exercise keener
      inquisition before parting with their hard-earned money for any
      cause. It is not enough to just give because "there are people out
      there who can benefit from it", or "just move on" to avoid the
      hassles that comes with becoming better informed. Charity giving
      should not become an act of robotic giving.

      6. Finally, the public has the right to ask, and the equivalent
      right to a satisfactory answer, from institutions charged with the
      handling of public money. These institutions include IPCs and the
      nation's public offices.

      All parties should now work together to turn IPCs into 'Institutes of
      Public Confidence'.

      Yours truly,

      Yip Yew Weng
      President
      For 10th Central Executive Committee
      National Solidarity Party
      (sent by Steve Chia, NCMP on behalf of)

      -----------------------------------------------------------------------

      From: Carl Kapeland
      To: Mellanie Hewlitt
      16 July 2005
      Singapore Review
      Legitimized Corruption Understood

      Dear Mellanie

      In the latest developments the entire NKF Board and its CEO have taken the easy route out and resigned. That's leadership for you, when things get messy, just get up and leave the mess for someone else to clean up.

      But I don't think the new CEO or Board will do much cleaning up. Looks like they are replacing one bunch of rotten apples with another bunch of potentially more rotten apples. It does not address the real problem.

      WHAT IS THE REAL PROBLEM?

      There are several recurrent issues here. Singapore is in this current mess because Lee's PAP Government has forgotten that not everything can be reduced to money. You cannot throw money at all your problems and expect it to magically disappear.

      The material base that motivates Singapore's "leaders" is only too evident when the NKF's transit CEO (Gerald Ee) hinted that "SGD600,000/- may not be sufficient for the new replacement to take office"!!! Money is the only motivating factor and if they have elected a leader and a board who is motivated only by money, its only a natural and unavoidable result that they will end up with an organization which has forgotten its once noble purpose and replaced it with more materialistic pursuits.

      Have they (Singapore) appointed a Wolf in sheep's clothing to guard their precious flock? For positions like these in charity organizations, THE CHIEF MOTIVATING FACTOR CANNOT BE MONEY! as they are not running an investment bank. The same applies senior public service positions and for ministerial positions. NOT EVERYTHING CAN BE REDUCED TO MONEY. But Lee's PAP Ministers have used this holistic approach to address any and all issues under the sun.

      Lee and his ministers simply CANNOT RUN A COUNTRY THE SAME WAY THEY RUN A COMPANY. Why? Because a country comprises of flesh and blood and spirit. A company is merely a corporate vehicle that is often set-up for the sole purpose of reaping a monetary profit.

      SINGAPORE AS A COUNTRY, IS NOT SINGAPORE INC!!!! And even if it is, its directors (and that means Lee and his million dollar cabinet) have to remain accountable to the shareholders (Singapore citizens). Singapore MINISTERS have to be transparent, and they are not especially as regards their salaries and the management of the country's reserves.

      Consider this, the NKF was originally set up as a supposedly charitable organization. In form and function it appeared above board and reputable. But in actual practice it had a hidden agenda to siphon wealth from the public into state coffers. And what happens to all this money (all SGD200 million of it?) No body knows.

      These same similarities in the NKF saga are reproduced on a grander scale in overall state administration in Singapore. Whether its the CPF, LTA, GLCs, Temasek etc they all relate to the the same basic issue. It goes back to the same bunch of corrupt leaders paying themselves and their cronies humongous rediculous salaries, approved and legitimized under a set of bogus laws that they legislated in the first place.

      But even before this NKF scam, transparency issues have dogged Singapore's state administration for decades and repeated requests by the World Bank, IMF, FTA and other NGOs for greater accountability and transparency havebasically fallen on deaf ears.

      These are basic transparency issues which plaque management of public moneys by all state entities (whether its the CPF Board, GLCs, Temasek, LTA etc). There is massive deception on a grand scale and I suspect the latest NKF debacle only surfaced due to internal friction within Singapore's "inner-circle of elite politicians." Perhaps someone amongst Singapore's Ruling Elite wanted a bigger portion of the loot.

      Think about it. Durai commenced his latest law suite on the confident assumption that it would be a "no contest" walk-over like his two previous suites. But whilst the Singapore sham courts had no problems finding
      in his favor in the 2 previous suites (which were taken against private individuals and a volunteer who correctly questioned his lavish spending), the latest suite was against another state bureaucracy. And it was inevitable that the sham court found in favor of the bigger devil. So even amongst the thieves there is a power struggle over who gets a bigger piece of the loot.

      So this then is justice ala Singapore styled. Who you are and who you are connected with ultimately decides the outcome of the law suite. The material facts of the case (and legal premise) have little relevance in the kangaroo's court final assessment.

      But by far the most troubling problem is that of Legitimized Corruption. You (Mellanie) have used the term "Legitimized Corruption" very accurately, but failed to elaborate on its true meaning and implications.

      Legitimized Corruption means essentially that the corrupt act itself is made perfectly legal. That is why there is a possibility that the external audit on NKF may turn out nothing because Durai and his actions may have been all perfectly legitimate and authorized according to the internal constitution of the Board.

      In a normal organization with bona fide controls in place, the Board would not have approved and allowed such unreasonable and lavish expenditures. However, in Singapore's setting where "anything goes" it is possible that the board were within their discretionary powers to authorize such lavish expenditures. Mind you these are expenditures which (by any ordinary definition) would have amounted to an immoral mis-management of public moneys for unauthorized applications. But if the internal rules of conduct of NKF allowed the Board to act in this manner, it would then be an authorized and legitimate act.

      So even after the process of audit has concluded it is perfectly possible for the auditors to conclude that the use of donor funds for;
      a) Durai's pay of SGD600,000 and his salary of SGD1.8 million;
      b) All expenses and application of donor funds used for purchase of SGD990/- gold taps;
      c) All expenses for first class air travel;
      d) The levying of a 30% Admin Fee;
      e) The hiring of personal drivers and limos.
      All of the above are authorized and legitimate.

      Anyway we all know that the so called "audit" of the NKF accounts is merely a publicity stunt to show case to the world that the current government and the new board is taking steps to remain accountable.

      But does this make the above acts any more acceptable and morally correct. NO! Of cause not. An atrocity is still an atrocity even though it is legitimized. One clear example is prostitution in Singapore. It is legal and the fact that it is legal does not detract one iota from the fact that it is still immoral, depraved and inhuman.

      Of cause there are critics who will argue that moral values are to subjective concepts and we cannot always use these imprecise measures to define what is right or wrong. And I concede that there is some truth in this as we live in a world coloured in grey.

      However, there will always remain some acts which are so blatantly wrong that they remain morally objectionable and immoral by any standard and yardstick. And the NKF scam (as well as Singapore ministerial salaries) fall within this category. It is morally wrong by any measure and this is not a grey area at all.

      This same logic applies on a larger scale as regards ministerial salaries and the process that is orchestrated to "approve" such unreasonable and lavish salaries (amounting to millions of dollars per minister).

      Legitimized Corruption works much like Money Laundering, but is worse. In essence Legitimized Corruption is corruption which is made legal. These perpetrators attempt to do what drug cartels and money launderers do;- basically "launder" the money (or the dishonest act) and make the final product appear nice and clean.

      But senior politicians differ from your average drug lord or mafia boss in one important respect;- these ministers are much more sophisticated. They know the system (and probably designed it) and know how to manupulate and tweak the system so that they can have access to the ill-gotten gains without getting their hands dirty. Next to them, Gordon Gecko and the God-Father look like novices and vestal virgins.

      However make no mistake the underlying act itself remains wrong, dishonest and morally objectionable but is hidden under a cloak of legitimacy. Drug money (and money from dishonest trades) is still ill-gotten loot. Behind this elaborate sham are a host of corporate and state entities (GLCs, state owned entities and yes, charitable organisations) which are set-up to place a corporate veil between the real perpetrators and the morally objectionable and dishonest transaction.

      The fact that it is perfectly legitimate does not itself make it MORALLY CORRECT. This is especially the case when you have a legislature that is totally removed (and remains out of touch) with the moral values and aspirations of the people it is supposed to serve and protect.

      In fact, this kind of legitimized corruption is the worst possible kind as it means the corruption has infiltrated the most senior ranks of management (and the political leaders). Compared to this elaborate deceit, the more obvious corruption in Indonesia are crude by comparison and far easier to identify and correct as it is acknowledged that such objectionable acts itself are WRONG and are not endorsed by the country's laws.

      How do you ask a cop to catch a thief when the cop himself is a thief?

      Legitimized Corruption by its very nature is more sinister and difficult to identify. For instance, a government official who accepts bribes worth $1.6 million a year is guilty of corruption. But what happens if this same official or minister receives this money as part of his "LEGITIMATE" salary. In both cases the act itself is the same unconscionable and immoral act. But in the later case, there is no need for the official to hide his ill-gotten gains as it is formally endorsed by an equally corrupt legislature/parliament who has a hand in the ill gotten gains.

      The definition of a Parasitic Leech is as follows: "leech: a follower who hangs around a host (without benefit to the host) in hope of gain or advantage"
      http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&safe=off&rls=RNWE,RNWE:2004-48,RNWE:en&oi=defmore&q=define:parasite
      The kind of legitimized corruption already endorsed and prevalent in Singapore's state machinery is far worse. It is a cancerous malice which is more surreptitious and insidious. The festering rot is not immediately apparent to an external casual observer but is eating away the core of the its host. Left unchecked, such parasites will consume a once healthy body before discarding the empty shell and relocating to another unwary host.

      Legitimized Corruption is also like cancer. It is a chronic ailment which rooted itself very deeply within the host (and the state machinery). Such a chronic ailment did not occur over night but took place over decades of accumulated unchecked accesses. Durai himself was in the NKF for over 30 years and it is no mere coincidence that Singapore has been under the same government (and people and family) for over 30 years.

      This is precisely the reason why in the US and other bona fide democracies there is a mandatory change in administration every 4-8 years. A new administration brings forth a completely new government which will was away unchecked accesses and commence things tabula rasa.

      But somehow in Singapore it appears that only families starting with the Lee surname or who are closely affiliated with this first family are the only candidates who qualify for election. What a quaint and family friendly arrangement! Its just too bad that the average Singaporean is excluded from this elitist inner-circle.

      However, Singapore's Ruling Elite also have to be wary of the accompanying dangers of in-breeding which can occur from a small and exclusive gene pool. Cancerous deformaities can result after generations of in-breeding.

      And the Cancer has many signs and symptoms. There have already been many evident tell tale signs of the internal rot and its accompanying putrid stench. However, Singaporeans in their numbed state of awareness may be mistaking the over-powering stench of decay for sweet perfume. The entire state machinery is orchestrated to maintain this state of illusion and deception.

      In the normal mechanics of an open and transparent state legislature and government, the moral values of the mans on the street is reflected (although not perfectly) in the policy formulation process. This is not the case in Singapore and your "leaders" know it. Just challenge them to run a referendum regarding their salaries and it will be evident that 90% of the population are totally disgusted by such blatant acts of greed. Of cause the local state owned media will somehow always paint the picture of an adoring and obedient public as part of an elaborate charade. So the truth never ever gets out.

      Corruption of this scale starts form the top and slowly works its way down the ranks to pollute every senior arm of the state machinery from the Judiciary to Legislature to the Executive and especially to a docile and compliant state managed local press. It cannot be stopped easily without external intervention.

      Slowly but surely what started off as a morally unacceptable issue becomes part and parcel of "accepted norm" which is disguised behind a pile of state endorsed laws and bills. Even the once sacred document, the Constitution, is not spared and is re-written to the whims and fancies of those they serve. How many Singaporeans are aware of the fact that the country's Constituion has been amended to allow state owned entities and GLCs easier access directly to the country's reserves? And it also does not take a genius to work out that it is the close affiliates of the Ruling Elite who sit on the management boards of these state owned entities and GLCs.

      The following is a fascinating observation. The exact size of Singapore's foreign exchange reserves and the management of thses funds is designated as a STATE SECURITY FOR INTERNAL SECURITY REASONS. Is it mere co-incidence that the conservative ball park estimate of the net worth of the Lee family is roughly equivalent to your country's reserves? (USD130-140 billion?)

      What you have in Singapore are a bunch of hired mercenaries who are ripping off the very people they are supposed to look after.

      Singaporeans. This is your country and your life. If you continue in this state of drugged apathy, you will cease to have any control over your own faith and destiny.

      Do you really want to hand over your life to the devil?

      Do you want to have a Singapore with No Singaporeans?

      Its time to wake up from your state of denial and confront the harsh reality before your very eyes.

      Yours faithfully

      Carl Kapeland
      Ohio State

      For more details on the above, see "Lifting The Veil On Singapore
      Politics"; http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sg_Review/message/1755

      Does splashing white paint on a black car make the black car white? You decide.
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.