Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

LEONG Sze Hian -- 31 July 3pm to 6pm forum “The Un official Guide to CPF Life & Retirement Planning”, registe r now

Expand Messages
  • Robert Ho
    Latest questions about CPF Life [image: DMCA.com] July 29th, 2013 | Author:
    Message 1 of 1 , Jul 29 6:58 PM
    • 0 Attachment

      Latest questions about CPF Life

      Mr Leong Sze Hian

      Public forum on CPF Life

      I was invited to be one of the two speakers at a public forum, “The Unofficial Guide to CPF Life & Retirement Planning”, on 31 July, 3 pm to 6 pm.

      In preparation for my presentation, I visited the CPF web site.

      CPF Life Information Booklet’s case study

      According to the CPF Life Information Booklet (page 29), there is a case study of a Mr Tan, age 55 with $100,000 in his Retirement Account. He opts for the default CPF Life Standard Plan.

      His monthly life annuity payout from age 65 is projected to be from $816 to $901. This means that the projected average payout is $859 ($816 + $901 divided by 2).

      According to my calculations, I estimate that his $100,000 at age 55 till increase to about $156,446 at age 65 (4% interest plus an extra 1% on the first $60,000).

      CPF Life bequest

      The bequest to his beneficiaries upon his death, according to the booklet’s case study is as follows:-

      at age 65 – $111,036 to $112,806 (average is $111,922)

      age 75 – $12,742 to $16,684 (average is $16,198)

      age 85 – 0

      Compared to normal account drawdown? 

      If he withdraws $859 a month, I estimate that his account balance (from the starting balance $156,446 at age 65 and using the same assumptions of 4% plus an extra 1% on the first $60,000), to be about $113,528 and $46,942 at age 75 and 85, respectively.

      Low bequests?

      So, why is the average bequest so much lower at $111,922, $16,198 and 0 at age 65, 75 and 85, compared to the above computed account balances of $156,446, $113,528 and $46,942, respectively.

      For example, the difference upon death at age 75 is a whopping $97,330 ($113,528 – $16,198).

      Over-compensating for those who may live beyond 90?

      Where does this difference in the bequest go to? Well, it goes into the pooled CPF Life annuity fund.

      Why? – In order to compensate for some annuitants who may live very long.

      How long is very long I’m sure you may be asking now?

      Withdrawing $859 monthly from the starting balance of $156,446 is estimated to deplete the account after about 25 years, i.e. when Mr Tan is 90 years old.

      Life expectancy at 90?

      So, what is the life expectancy of Singaporean males at age 55, for the age of 90?

      In other words, what is the statistical probability of a Singaporean male at age 55 living beyond age 90?

      Are we compensating for the projection of Singaporean males who may live beyond 90 years old, by too much, by giving out such “very low” bequests (as illustrated above)?

      How many in absolute numbers beyond 90? State pension?

      How many male Singaporeans are projected in absolute numbers to live beyond age 90 in future years? Why not consider a state funded pension from age 90 on a means-tested basis to cater for those who may not be in a financial position to support themselves, instead of giving such “very low” bequests?

      We can afford it?

      With healthy Budget surpluses in about 9 out of every 10 years, $3.9 billion in the last year ($36 billion if IMF reporting standards are used) and estimated Reserves of over $900 billion, why not consider state funding of the above suggested means-tested pension for those who live beyond 90, instead of squeezing it out literally from every CPF Life scheme member vide “very low” bequests.

      Financial hardship?

      Such low bequests may be financially stressful or cause hardship, particularly for lower-income Singaporean families with dependents upon the demise of the CPF Life member.

      Make studies public?

      In this connection, calls over the years for the actuarial studies on the CPF Life scheme to be made public have been met with a deafening silence.

      In view of the above, perhaps its time to review the CPF Life scheme.

      Refund from CPF Life?

      Page 26 of the booklet talks about a discounted refund (unused annuity premium less a fee (how is this fee calculated?)), if a CPF Life member has a “medical condition which is likely to reduce your life expectancy” or “permanently leave Singapore and West Malaysia and have no intention of return to either country”, etc.

      No case study example?

      Instead of just saying “For information on the discounted refund, please email us at member@...”, why not give an example like the case study of Mr Tan?

      For those who may like to attend the 31 July (3 pm to 6 pm) public forum on “The Unofficial Guide to CPF Life & Retirement Planning”, please register through this link.

      P.S. My calculations and estimates may be a bit off as my only resource and tools are a Financial Calculator App on my Samsung S4 phone and a financial calculator.

      Leong Sze Hian

      Leong Sze Hian is the Past President of the Society of Financial Service Professionals, an alumnus of Harvard University, Wharton Fellow, SEACeM Fellow and an author of 4 books. He is frequently quoted in the media. He has also been invited to speak more than 100 times in 25 countries on 5 continents. He has served as Honorary Consul of Jamaica, Chairman of the Institute of Administrative Management, and founding advisor to the Financial Planning Associations of Brunei and Indonesia. He has 3 Masters, 2 Bachelors degrees and 13 professional qualifications. He blogs at http://www.leongszehian.com.


      --
      >>>>>>>>>>  TO HELP ME, COMPLETE THESE STATEMENTS, THANKS:  http://roberthorequestforstatements.blogspot.com/

      My wife, an accountant, then a manager in an MNC drawing a 5-figure salary before she retired, can confirm that I write the Truth in all these.  <<<<<<<<<<

      RH:   LKY LHL WKS ELECTION RIGGINGS EMAILED TO ALMOST ENTIRE GOVT:
      http://i-came-i-saw-i-solved-it.blogspot.com/2010/06/lky-lhl-wks-election-riggings-emailed.html

      ME ON VIDEO DESCRIBING lky lhl wks NUMEROUS ELECTION RIGGINGS + PoBoB and CCTV Ideas:
      http://i-came-i-saw-i-solved-it.blogspot.com/search/label/%22A%20Video%20RH%20on%20LKY%20LHL%20WKS%20cheating%20elections%20%2B%20PoBoB%20and%20CCTV%20Ideas%22

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jQCab3QZbBk

      MY ACQUAINTANCE, MR DAVID DUCLOS, A FORMER POLICE INSPECTOR, AND HIS LAWYER FRIEND, EYEWITNESSED LEE KUAN YEW RIGGING THE 1997 CHENG SAN GRC ELECTION.  READ MORE AT MY BLOG ENTITLED "I CAME, I SAW, I SOLVED IT" : 

      b.  SWORN EXHIBIT IN SUPPORT OF AFFIDAVIT:

      c.  SOME LEGAL PRINCIPLES ON WHICH I GROUND MY CASE:

      d.  THE PATTERN OF CRIMINAL WRONGDOINGS THAT PROVES MY CASE;

      e.  3rd EMAIL TO UK PM FOR OBSTRUCTING, PERVERTING JUSTICE:

      LEE Kuan Yew, LEE Hsien Loong, Tony TAN, HO Ching corruptions and theft of billions:

      "POWERFUL POLITICIANS WHO CANNOT CREATE, INVENT, SOLVE PROBLEMS AND CHANGE THE WORLD CAN ONLY TAKE SATISFACTION BLOCKING, DEGRADING, THOSE WHO CAN."
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.