Re: Death Robots
- I remember doing the first tests one night at 3am behind a shopping
mall with my buddy. It was pretty exciting.
The target tracking method was fairly simplistic but worked ok.
We started by using IR encoder chips made by Holtek but we quickly
realised that this incurred way too much overhead and thus caused
major detection lag.
IR is also a big problem as it bounced on the arena walls causing
Our team came up with a better solution using a rotating laser scanner
coupled with 3M reflecting stripes on the opposing robot. This worked
much better but I never got the scanner to scan sufficiently fast as
laser beam got too dim at high rates.
I now have the knowledge to do the same using computer vision so I'd
have to crank up a prototype to show at the next meeting.
--- In SeattleRobotics@yahoogroups.com, "Doug Leppard" <DLeppard@c...>
> I was very impressed on that one video and the two hits you made with
> the paintball.
> Doug Leppard
> -----Original Message-----
> From: SeattleRobotics@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:SeattleRobotics@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of stephane641
> Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 4:10 PM
> To: SeattleRobotics@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [SeattleRobotics] Re: Death Robots
> Yeah, our club (ORE or Ottawa Robotics Enthusiasts) started this
> splatbot even in 2000 but due to the complexity/price of paintball
> markers and other safety issues we decided to switch to Nerf guns
> I designed the Xtreme Overkill bot that you see on the splatbot page
> (check www.ottawarobotics.org) with a buddy of mine.
> I documented some of the design at robotics.no-ip.org (currently down
> but will be back up in 1 hour)
> My following robot used the old base but with a heavily hacked
> nerf-gun to increase muzzle velocity. Although the competition never
> made it big we had 3-4 robots in construction. We might even be able
> to revive it this summer.
> It's definitely exciting to watch completely "autonomous" robot duke
> it out in an arena though. A lot of unexpected things happen! :)
> Take care,
> --- In SeattleRobotics@yahoogroups.com, Brian Dean <bsd@b...> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 09:56:53PM -0800, Johnny wrote:
> > > The URL seems dead, but I think I know the one that you are talking
> > > about. It was more for robot battleing. I am going to use mine as
> > > more of an example of bad things that I can do with technology.
> > Why would you want to do that?
> > Just curious.
> > -Brian
> > --
> > Brian Dean
> > ATmega128 based MAVRIC controllers
> > http://www.bdmicro.com/
> Visit the SRS Website at http://www.seattlerobotics.org
> Yahoo! Groups Links
- On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 07:46:47PM -0000, stephane641 wrote:
> Well, I wouldn't consider ours as dangerous as they had an enclosingYour setup looked great. Perhaps the Robomagellan rule makers would
> arena and a max firing rate (once every 5 seconds max) and a max of
> 5-6 shots.
> we had pretty good rules defined too.
consider a cone "touch" satisfied by a paintball splat. Certainly
would make that contest more exciting and solve that pesky spectator
problem of people getting in the way :-) BYOG - bring your own
ATmega128 based MAVRIC controllers