Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Robothon is coming!

Expand Messages
  • Cathy Saxton
    The Seattle Robotics Society s Robothon is coming up! It s September 24-26 at the Seattle Center, and is free and open to the public. Please visit
    Message 1 of 13 , Aug 13, 2004
    • 0 Attachment
      The Seattle Robotics Society's Robothon is coming up! It's September
      24-26 at the Seattle Center, and is free and open to the public.
      Please visit http://www.robothon.org for more details.

      There will be a variety of fun and exciting robot competitions, a
      robot-building workshop, technology presentations, exhibitors and
      vendors displaying and selling cool stuff, and rentals of
      beetle-weight combat robots.

      Online registration is required for the robot competitions. It's free
      and it helps us plan the amount of time for each event, so please sign
      up your robots!

      You can see a tentative schedule at:
      http://www.robothon.org/robothon/schedule.html

      Register your robot(s) at:
      http://www.robothon.org/robothon/register.html

      Good luck!

      Cathy Saxton
      Robothon Committee
    • Bob Cook
      Robothon is being held on Saturday September 21st this year! Still plenty of time to finish (or start!) a robot for your favorite contest. There will be four
      Message 2 of 13 , Aug 17, 2013
      • 0 Attachment
        Robothon is being held on Saturday September 21st this year! Still plenty of time to finish (or start!) a robot for your favorite contest.

        There will be four events this year:

        - Line Following
        - Line Maze
        - Minisumo
        - Robo-Magellan

        You can find all the current information about the event, contest rules, schedule, etc, at: http://www.robothon.org/

        Please register any robots you're hoping to compete with. You can use the same form for display tables. This really helps with scheduling!

        http://www.robothon.org/robothon/robot.php

        Thanks, and hope to see you at Robothon!
      • Tony Mactutis
        Question: if my controller is a cellphone, can I carry the phone over the course during the 30-minute prep period, or would that be considered a violation of
        Message 3 of 13 , Sep 4, 2013
        • 0 Attachment
          Question: if my controller is a cellphone, can I carry the phone over the course during the 30-minute prep period, or would that be considered a violation of "the actual robot will not be allowed on the course".

          If that is true (that carrying the phone would not be allowed), then that would seem to imply that I would need 2 cellphones to do what I have in mind -

          thanks!

          On 8/17/2013 9:49 AM, Bob Cook wrote:
           

          Robothon is being held on Saturday September 21st this year! Still plenty of time to finish (or start!) a robot for your favorite contest.

          There will be four events this year:

          - Line Following
          - Line Maze
          - Minisumo
          - Robo-Magellan

          You can find all the current information about the event, contest rules, schedule, etc, at: http://www.robothon.org/

          Please register any robots you're hoping to compete with. You can use the same form for display tables. This really helps with scheduling!

          http://www.robothon.org/robothon/robot.php

          Thanks, and hope to see you at Robothon!


        • David Buckley
          And I would guess the organiser would still see that as cheating even if not specifically banned by the rules. ... From: Tony Mactutis To:
          Message 4 of 13 , Sep 5, 2013
          • 0 Attachment
            And I would guess the organiser would still see that as cheating even if not specifically banned by the rules.
             
            ----- Original Message -----
            Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2013 4:30 AM
            Subject: [SeattleRobotics] Robomagellan rules question

             

            Question: if my controller is a cellphone, can I carry the phone over the course during the 30-minute prep period, or would that be considered a violation of "the actual robot will not be allowed on the course".

            If that is true (that carrying the phone would not be allowed), then that would seem to imply that I would need 2 cellphones to do what I have in mind -

            thanks!

            On 8/17/2013 9:49 AM, Bob Cook wrote:
             

            Robothon is being held on Saturday September 21st this year! Still plenty of time to finish (or start!) a robot for your favorite contest.

            There will be four events this year:

            - Line Following
            - Line Maze
            - Minisumo
            - Robo-Magellan

            You can find all the current information about the event, contest rules, schedule, etc, at: http://www.robothon.org/

            Please register any robots you're hoping to compete with. You can use the same form for display tables. This really helps with scheduling!

            http://www.robothon.org/robothon/robot.php

            Thanks, and hope to see you at Robothon!


          • Randy M. Dumse
            I really don t know David. Here are two very similar cases, how can you say no them? 1.) I bring a robot with a handheld GPS. I leave the robot at the
            Message 5 of 13 , Sep 5, 2013
            • 0 Attachment

              I really don’t know David. Here are two very similar cases, how can you say no them?

               

              1.)    I bring a robot with a handheld GPS. I leave the robot at the start, and walk the handheld CPS only on the course.

              2.)    I bring two GPS (let them both be handhelds, OR, two identical phones with GPS). I walk one phone/GPS. I leave the other on the robot back at the start. I transfer the information from one to the other. (Could be by exchanging MicroSD, or even by nearfield communications with nothing physical from the walk’d one to the sitting one.

               

              If you don’t exclude using identical GPS equipment in both cases, what’s the difference? And wasn’t this the original idea , for example with JBot, where DPA was going to be able to detach his ETrax, and walk with it?

               

              Randy

               

              From: SeattleRobotics@yahoogroups.com [mailto:SeattleRobotics@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of David Buckley
              Sent: Thursday, September 5, 2013 5:43 AM
              To: SeattleRobotics@yahoogroups.com
              Subject: Re: [SeattleRobotics] Robomagellan rules question

               




              And I would guess the organiser would still see that as cheating even if not specifically banned by the rules.

               

              ----- Original Message -----

              Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2013 4:30 AM

              Subject: [SeattleRobotics] Robomagellan rules question

               

               

              Question: if my controller is a cellphone, can I carry the phone over the course during the 30-minute prep period, or would that be considered a violation of "the actual robot will not be allowed on the course".

              If that is true (that carrying the phone would not be allowed), then that would seem to imply that I would need 2 cellphones to do what I have in mind -

              thanks!

               

            • Bob Cook
              Hi Tony, I m the judge for this year s Robo-Magellan event, so I guess I get to decide these things. :) In the past we ve allowed removable GPS units to be
              Message 6 of 13 , Sep 5, 2013
              • 0 Attachment
                Hi Tony,

                I'm the judge for this year's Robo-Magellan event, so I guess I get to decide these things.  :)

                In the past we've allowed removable GPS units to be walked around the course during the 30 minute preparation phase. I'm fine with your cellphone also being walked around the course for the same reason.

                The game is intended to be a display of autonomous robots roaming and navigating in an outdoor environment. The spirit of the rules is to NOT pre-record your robot's movements step by step, although it makes sense to use some sort of waypoint system and have the robot autonomously navigate between waypoints.

                Its really on the honor system for each contestant to keep with this intention (e.g. I'm not going to inspect your cellphone or source code for signs of cheating).

                - Bob Cook


                On 2013-09-04, at 8:30 PM, Tony Mactutis <tony@...> wrote:


                Question: if my controller is a cellphone, can I carry the phone over the course during the 30-minute prep period, or would that be considered a violation of "the actual robot will not be allowed on the course".

                If that is true (that carrying the phone would not be allowed), then that would seem to imply that I would need 2 cellphones to do what I have in mind -

                thanks!


              • Randy M. Dumse
                Bob Cook said: Thursday, September 5, 2013 8:27 AM ... Bob, I applaud this decision. It perhaps may not be the best for eliminating cheating, but it is at
                Message 7 of 13 , Sep 5, 2013
                • 0 Attachment
                  Bob Cook said: Thursday, September 5, 2013 8:27 AM
                  > In the past we've allowed removable GPS units to be
                  > walked around the course during the 30 minute
                  > preparation phase. I'm fine with your cellphone also
                  > being walked around the course for the same reason.

                  Bob, I applaud this decision. It perhaps may not be the
                  best for eliminating cheating, but it is at least enforceable.

                  Other option would be eliminate the walk around.

                  There will come a day when that will be an appropriate
                  Further restriction. But probably not now.

                  Randy
                • David Buckley
                  I would think that transferring GPS way points would be in the spirit of things. And I don t think walking the course and recording data and then have the
                  Message 8 of 13 , Sep 5, 2013
                  • 0 Attachment
                    I would think that transferring GPS way points would be in the spirit of things.
                    And I don't think walking the course and recording data and then have the robot follow the recorded data would be.
                     
                    Say you had a competition where a robot arm had to do some manipulation task and one team put in joint coordinates or extracted information from video to determine joint coordinates and another team used a data glove to guide the robot in the correct path and grasp the object and had it remember.  
                    Would the team with the data glove be competing in the spirit of things?
                     
                    If I was the organiser I would allow recording the course or using a data glove for the arm but then just before the competition itself I would alter things so say the middle way point was 3ft to the East or the object to be grasped was in some defined location offset from the recorded position.
                    If it was just a recording then altering it to suit would not be easy. If it was a series of commands - eg goto this way point then that one, then editing the command list should be easy. Better still would be to be able to instruct the robot that the (say) third way point should be offset 3ft to the East of the given point.
                     
                    Nothing wrong with a data glove or teaching an arm using compliance - like Baxter, a method which has been around for as long as I can remember but just nobody used it, but the moves list should be editable even if the robot does that by automatically inserting a new recording.
                     
                    DAvid
                     
                     
                     
                    ----- Original Message -----
                    Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2013 1:45 PM
                    Subject: RE: [SeattleRobotics] Robomagellan rules question

                     

                    I really don’t know David. Here are two very similar cases, how can you say no them?

                    1.)    I bring a robot with a handheld GPS. I leave the robot at the start, and walk the handheld CPS only on the course.

                    2.)    I bring two GPS (let them both be handhelds, OR, two identical phones with GPS). I walk one phone/GPS. I leave the other on the robot back at the start. I transfer the information from one to the other. (Could be by exchanging MicroSD, or even by nearfield communications with nothing physical from the walk’d one to the sitting one.

                    If you don’t exclude using identical GPS equipment in both cases, what’s the difference? And wasn’t this the original idea , for example with JBot, where DPA was going to be able to detach his ETrax, and walk with it?

                    Randy

                    From: SeattleRobotics@yahoogroups.com [mailto:SeattleRobotics@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of David Buckley
                    Sent: Thursday, September 5, 2013 5:43 AM
                    To: SeattleRobotics@yahoogroups.com
                    Subject: Re: [SeattleRobotics] Robomagellan rules question




                    And I would guess the organiser would still see that as cheating even if not specifically banned by the rules.

                    ----- Original Message -----

                    Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2013 4:30 AM

                    Subject: [SeattleRobotics] Robomagellan rules question

                     

                    Question: if my controller is a cellphone, can I carry the phone over the course during the 30-minute prep period, or would that be considered a violation of "the actual robot will not be allowed on the course".

                    If that is true (that carrying the phone would not be allowed), then that would seem to imply that I would need 2 cellphones to do what I have in mind -

                    thanks!

                  • dpa_io
                    Hey Randy, not to be dis ing jBot, it needs no pre-walk to run a Robomagellan course! Just the target waypoints. It figures out everything else by itself.
                    Message 9 of 13 , Sep 5, 2013
                    • 0 Attachment
                      Hey Randy, not to be dis'ing jBot, it needs no "pre-walk" to run a Robomagellan course! Just the target waypoints. It figures out everything else by itself.

                      However, from where I sit, "cheating" has not been so much a problem with RoboMagellan, as has been "participation." Over emphasis on the former seems to depress the later.

                      dpa



                      --- In SeattleRobotics@yahoogroups.com, "Randy M. Dumse" <rmd@...> wrote:
                      >
                      > I really don't know David. Here are two very similar cases, how can you say
                      > no them?
                      >
                      >
                      >
                      > 1.) I bring a robot with a handheld GPS. I leave the robot at the start,
                      > and walk the handheld CPS only on the course.
                      >
                      > 2.) I bring two GPS (let them both be handhelds, OR, two identical phones
                      > with GPS). I walk one phone/GPS. I leave the other on the robot back at the
                      > start. I transfer the information from one to the other. (Could be by
                      > exchanging MicroSD, or even by nearfield communications with nothing
                      > physical from the walk'd one to the sitting one.
                      >
                      >
                      >
                      > If you don't exclude using identical GPS equipment in both cases, what's the
                      > difference? And wasn't this the original idea , for example with JBot, where
                      > DPA was going to be able to detach his ETrax, and walk with it?
                      >
                      >
                      >
                      > Randy
                      >
                      >
                      >
                      > From: SeattleRobotics@yahoogroups.com
                      > [mailto:SeattleRobotics@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of David Buckley
                      > Sent: Thursday, September 5, 2013 5:43 AM
                      > To: SeattleRobotics@yahoogroups.com
                      > Subject: Re: [SeattleRobotics] Robomagellan rules question
                      >
                      >
                      >
                      >
                      >
                      >
                      >
                      >
                      > And I would guess the organiser would still see that as cheating even if not
                      > specifically banned by the rules.
                      >
                      >
                      >
                      > ----- Original Message -----
                      >
                      > From: Tony Mactutis <mailto:tony@...>
                      >
                      > To: SeattleRobotics@yahoogroups.com
                      >
                      > Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2013 4:30 AM
                      >
                      > Subject: [SeattleRobotics] Robomagellan rules question
                      >
                      >
                      >
                      >
                      >
                      > Question: if my controller is a cellphone, can I carry the phone over the
                      > course during the 30-minute prep period, or would that be considered a
                      > violation of "the actual robot will not be allowed on the course".
                      >
                      > If that is true (that carrying the phone would not be allowed), then that
                      > would seem to imply that I would need 2 cellphones to do what I have in mind
                      > -
                      >
                      > thanks!
                      >
                    • KM6VV
                      Maybe Robomagellan could be viewed as two two contests in one. One, steering to one or more goals (way-points) and navigating obstacles. Two, finding
                      Message 10 of 13 , Sep 5, 2013
                      • 0 Attachment
                        Maybe Robomagellan could be viewed as two two contests in one. One,
                        steering to one or more goals (way-points) and navigating obstacles.
                        Two, finding (detecting) and navigating to a defined object (cone). If
                        your GPS is good enough, one might not need the vision, or vice-versa?

                        What's more important, the vision or way-point navigation?
                        Accomplishing both can be quite difficult (I'm still working on mine).
                        Maybe a simpler "entry level" contests could do just the vision? Or
                        just way-point navigation?

                        I've pondered the best way to get way-points into my 'bot. Just driving
                        the 'bot around the course and saving all the moves seems a little too
                        much. But simply saving the way-points yourself with another GPS should
                        be fine, it's just duplicating the creation of the way-point list.

                        I want a hand held GPS that writes to an SD card. Or one might extract
                        GPS coordinates from a Google-Earth map. How do the judges make up the
                        way-point list?

                        Alan KM6VV
                        HBRobotics club.

                        On 9/5/2013 8:26 AM, dpa_io wrote:
                        >
                        >
                        > Hey Randy, not to be dis'ing jBot, it needs no "pre-walk" to run a Robomagellan course! Just the target waypoints. It figures out everything else by itself.
                        >
                        > However, from where I sit, "cheating" has not been so much a problem with RoboMagellan, as has been "participation." Over emphasis on the former seems to depress the later.
                        >
                        > dpa
                        >
                        > --- In SeattleRobotics@yahoogroups.com, "Randy M. Dumse" <rmd@...> wrote:
                        >>
                        >> I really don't know David. Here are two very similar cases, how can you say
                        >> no them?
                        >>
                        >>
                        >>
                        >> 1.) I bring a robot with a handheld GPS. I leave the robot at the start,
                        >> and walk the handheld CPS only on the course.
                        >>
                        >> 2.) I bring two GPS (let them both be handhelds, OR, two identical phones
                        >> with GPS). I walk one phone/GPS. I leave the other on the robot back at the
                        >> start. I transfer the information from one to the other. (Could be by
                        >> exchanging MicroSD, or even by nearfield communications with nothing
                        >> physical from the walk'd one to the sitting one.
                        >>
                        >>
                        >>
                        >> If you don't exclude using identical GPS equipment in both cases, what's the
                        >> difference? And wasn't this the original idea , for example with JBot, where
                        >> DPA was going to be able to detach his ETrax, and walk with it?
                        >>
                        >>
                        >>
                        >> Randy
                        >>
                        >>
                      • Bob Cook
                        ... Awesome, I wish you were coming to Robothon, your robot is a fantastic creation and the envy of many. There are a few others who can accomplish the same
                        Message 11 of 13 , Sep 5, 2013
                        • 0 Attachment
                          On 2013-09-05, at 8:26 AM, "dpa_io" <davida@...> wrote:

                          >
                          > Hey Randy, not to be dis'ing jBot, it needs no "pre-walk" to run a Robomagellan course! Just the target waypoints. It figures out everything else by itself.

                          Awesome, I wish you were coming to Robothon, your robot is a fantastic creation and the envy of many. There are a few others who can accomplish the same feat, but very few.

                          >
                          > However, from where I sit, "cheating" has not been so much a problem with RoboMagellan, as has been "participation." Over emphasis on the former seems to depress the later.

                          Completely agree. I'd rather bend the rules to encourage more participation than worry about the "legalese". We need more people building roving robots.

                          - Bob
                        • Tony Mactutis
                          Sounds good Bob, thanks -
                          Message 12 of 13 , Sep 5, 2013
                          • 0 Attachment
                            Sounds good Bob, thanks -

                            On 9/5/2013 6:26 AM, Bob Cook wrote:
                             

                            Hi Tony,


                            I'm the judge for this year's Robo-Magellan event, so I guess I get to decide these things.  :)

                            In the past we've allowed removable GPS units to be walked around the course during the 30 minute preparation phase. I'm fine with your cellphone also being walked around the course for the same reason.

                            The game is intended to be a display of autonomous robots roaming and navigating in an outdoor environment. The spirit of the rules is to NOT pre-record your robot's movements step by step, although it makes sense to use some sort of waypoint system and have the robot autonomously navigate between waypoints.

                            Its really on the honor system for each contestant to keep with this intention (e.g. I'm not going to inspect your cellphone or source code for signs of cheating).

                            - Bob Cook


                            On 2013-09-04, at 8:30 PM, Tony Mactutis <tony@...> wrote:


                            Question: if my controller is a cellphone, can I carry the phone over the course during the 30-minute prep period, or would that be considered a violation of "the actual robot will not be allowed on the course".

                            If that is true (that carrying the phone would not be allowed), then that would seem to imply that I would need 2 cellphones to do what I have in mind -

                            thanks!



                          • dpa_io
                            Exactly. more robots! best luck with your competition. dpa
                            Message 13 of 13 , Sep 6, 2013
                            • 0 Attachment
                              Exactly. more robots! best luck with your competition.

                              dpa




                              --- In SeattleRobotics@yahoogroups.com, Bob Cook <bob@...> wrote:
                              >
                              >
                              > On 2013-09-05, at 8:26 AM, "dpa_io" <davida@...> wrote:
                              >
                              > >
                              > > Hey Randy, not to be dis'ing jBot, it needs no "pre-walk" to run a Robomagellan course! Just the target waypoints. It figures out everything else by itself.
                              >
                              > Awesome, I wish you were coming to Robothon, your robot is a fantastic creation and the envy of many. There are a few others who can accomplish the same feat, but very few.
                              >
                              > >
                              > > However, from where I sit, "cheating" has not been so much a problem with RoboMagellan, as has been "participation." Over emphasis on the former seems to depress the later.
                              >
                              > Completely agree. I'd rather bend the rules to encourage more participation than worry about the "legalese". We need more people building roving robots.
                              >
                              > - Bob
                              >
                            Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.