45441Re: [SeattleRobotics] Neato wifi
- Jul 1, 2011
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 6:10 PM, Weston Turner <wstnturner@...> wrote:If you are not embedding significant compute power in the robot, why would you want to use a heavyweight TCPIP stack and wifi? Why not use a lightweight wireless protocol like Zigbee or Bluetooth
Zigbee is too slow, since the XV-11 can generate over 30KB of sensor data per second. There's a lot more going on than in a Roomba.
I'd be interested to hear about your experiences using Bluetooth over 100m. Which product did you use? I've attempted to use Bluetooth in a couple of robots and just can't get the range or reliability needed. Indoors, it is prone to bursts of lag as the robot moves around, which just sucks with a mobile robot that needs good responses. I've used USB Bluetooth dongles and standalone UART modules.
For me, only Wifi has been sufficiently reliable/low-latency/functional-in-homes. And of course it's not perfect either, but it sure beats Bluetooth!
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>