36917RE: [SeattleRobotics] Re: language - neural nets
- Oct 1, 2008Matthew Tedder said: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 1:06 AM
> But win or loose, it is a sad fact that roboticsI think it is wonderful if we have at least line following
> projects in universities typically involve little
> more than line-following robots.
projects at universities. Many useful motion control and
robotics points are covered by line following.
It is one of the low hanging fruit, a fairly simple minimal
machine configuration that demonstrates a motion based utility.
At least it is a first step. Better than no step at all.
Likewise I don't think it is sad that grade eschool doesn't
teach much more than foundational reading writing 'rithmetic. In
fact, I wish they would stick more to the fundamentals. (As an
example, in 4th grade, my step daughter came home talking about
the rain forrest. We asked her if she remembered when we took
her to the rain forrest? She said she'd never been. Turns out
the pictures of rainbows and pretty birds didn't register at all
in her mind with what she actually saw in the Yucatan penisula.)
I agree with your zeal for advanced projects, but I object to
any critic of teaching fundamentals to as wide an audience as
possible, lowering the entry barrier for someone who might want
to go further.
BTW, here's a mind twist for you. Can you write a
non-line-following program? And just how intelligent would that
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>