Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Fwd: Eric's STAIFF 2006 Talk & National Defense Issues

Expand Messages
  • Jack Sarfatti
    Message 1 of 1 , Mar 1, 2006
    • 0 Attachment
      Begin forwarded message:

      > Subject: Eric's STAIFF 2006 Talk & National Defense Issues
      >
      > Thanks Eric, I took a quick look. Looks useful I will get back to it.
      > You are getting closer to my qualitative position already in my two
      > books from 2002. Thank GOD(D) no mention of PV anymore! ;-)
      >
      > I am still skeptical whether we need branes or not. Maybe.
      >
      > I think all we need are ANYONS IN 2D films with a kind of Josephson
      > Effect to control the local inflation vacuum coherence field - it's
      > still with us of course because curved spacetime emerges from it in my
      > theory. The reality of the alleged alien machines, that you and I
      > agree about at least as a working hypothesis, means that the
      > "Skinwalkers" or whoever have some "soft" "Aikido" way of manipulating
      > the local geometrodynamic fields in the ship's fuselage perhaps
      > directly with their minds the way Uri Geller bends metal? This, after
      > all is what Ron, Kit, Hal et-al are interested in ultimately of course
      > for reasons of Homeland Security.
      >
      > The basic gravity field consists of the four tetrad 1-form fields
      >
      > e^a = 1^a + Lp[(dTheta^a)(Phi^a) - (Theta^a)(dPhi)^a]
      >
      > a = 0,1,2,3
      >
      > The second term on RHS is the curved tetrad compensating gauge
      > potential from locally gauging the translation group and also hiding
      > the globally flat translational symmetries in the vacuum. This is
      > basically a SPIN 1 theory with a SPIN 2 COMPOSITE from pairing in
      >
      > ds^2 = e^a(Minkowski)abe^b = guvdx^udx^v = Einstein's differential
      > local invariant
      >
      > e^a = e^audx^u
      >
      > See http://arxiv.org/pdf/gr-qc/0602022
      >
      > d is Cartan exterior derivative, i.e. gradient on the EIGHT 0-form
      > Goldstone phases Theta^a & Phi^a from hidden locally gauged symmetries
      > in the vacuum giving rise to emergent geometrodynamic structures, e.g.
      > curved space-time itself and perhaps Calabi-Yau -- "More is different"
      > (P.W. Anderson). e^a is dimensionless hence the Lp factor.
      >
      > When all Goldstone phases vanish all we have is the unstable
      > pre-inflation false globally flat vacuum out of which the Level 1
      > Tegmark "bubbles" "nucleate" in eternal inflation populating all the
      > nooks and crannies of Lenny Susskind's "Cosmic Landscape" that in FRW
      > limit has "height /\" with about 10^500 valleys from the extra 6
      > dimensions of the Calabi-Yau fiber space that seems to fit Gennady
      > Shipov's 10D torsion manifold rather naturally. However, I seem to get
      > a mass gap Meissner effect for the torsion quanta. Our universe in
      > Lenny's megaverse is inside an expanding Hubble horizon on one of an
      > infinity of bubbles in the false vacuum's hyperspace. "My Father's
      > House has many mansions." BTW see the Hindu Vedas about ancient "Wars
      > in Space" in addition to new alleged info from the Dead Sea Scrolls.
      >
      > When we also locally gauge the Lorentz group as well as the
      > translation group we get 6 extra independent torsion field 1-form
      > compensating gauge potentials
      >
      > &W^a^b = - &W^b^a ~ Lp[(dTheta^a)(Phi^b) - (Theta^a)(dPhi^b) -
      > (dTheta^b)(Phi^a) + (Theta^b)(dPhi^a)]
      >
      > Note &W^a^a = 0
      >
      > This &W^a^b is an additional piece to the SIX ZERO TORSION SPIN
      > CONNECTION 1-forms W^a^b
      >
      > W'^a^b = W^a^b(1915 GR) + &W^a^b
      >
      > i.e.
      >
      > D = d + W^ab/\
      >
      > D' = D + &W^av/\
      >
      > De^a = 0
      >
      > D'e^a =/= 0 = Shipov type of torsion 2-form (Kiehn has others I
      > think)
      >
      > R^a^b = DW^a^b = curvature 2-form without torsion
      >
      > R'^a^b = D'W'^a^b = curvature 2-form with Shipov-type torsion.
      >
      > FAST FORWARD
      > Control of dark energy for warp drive is via PHASE LOCK of ANYON
      > CONDENSATE to VACUUM CONDENSATE in thin high Tc films nano-engineered
      > into the the fuselages of the "alien craft" from universes next door
      > in the megaverse.
      >
      >
      > On Mar 1, 2006, at 11:41 AM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:
      >
      >> Just felt a small earthquake in San Francisco.
      >>
      >> On Mar 1, 2006, at 10:42 AM, Dr. Eric Davis wrote:
      >>
      >>> Jack:
      >>>
      >>> Everything I'm doing is strictly within GR theory. But you knew
      >>> that already.
      >>
      >> I am not disputing that. I have not seen what you are doing in detail
      >> since the USAF teleportation report that I liked except for your
      >> promoting PV as a viable alternative to a frontal assault on metric
      >> engineering with GR (extended to torsion I think). I think Hal should
      >> keep PV buried - it is simply too incomplete and it violates the
      >> LOCAL equivalence principle and tensor covariance. We can debate that
      >> later. The deepest way into the equivalence is the local gauging of
      >> all universal continuous space-time symmetries of ALL physical
      >> dynamical actions. We also have additional choice of "hiding the
      >> symmetry" (Sidney Coleman) in the physical vacuum. Note that R. Kiehn
      >> has a paper http://arxiv.org/pdf/gr-qc/0602118 on using Cartan forms
      >> for vacuum structure similar in spirit from my approach though his
      >> math is much deeper than mine. He has been doing this kind of math
      >> for many decades. I am still learning it.
      >>
      >>>
      >>> Although, the attached third STAIF paper (and attached PP slides in
      >>> PDF format) that I published and presented addresses being able to
      >>> do warp drive from a D-brane perspective where positive energy and
      >>> negative pressure are required to establish an FTL velocity boost.
      >>> The lead author of the paper is a NASA-JSC robotics engineer working
      >>> on his Ph.D. in GR physics at Rice Univ. under the supervision of
      >>> one of Rindler's former grad students. He previously published an
      >>> earlier version of this paper as a single author in GRG.
      >>
      >> Thanks will look at it. :-)
      >>
      >>>
      >>> Eric
      >>>
      >>> Eric W. Davis, Ph.D., FBIS
      >>> Inst. for Advanced Studies at Austin
      >>> 4030 W. Braker Lane, Suite 300
      >>> Austin, TX 78759
      >>
      >> CORRECTED DRAFT 3! (got Casimir-Gravity ratio wrong UPSIDE DOWN -
      >> mechanical algebraic error)
      >>>
      >>>> From: Jack Sarfatti <sarfatti@...>
      >>>> To: Gary Bekkum <garysbekkum@...>
      >>>>
      >>>> Subject: Fwd: STAIF 2006 Meeting Exotic Propulsion Minutes Date:
      >>>> Tue, 28 Feb 2006 20:58:02 -0800
      >>>>
      >>>> ...
      >>
      >>>> Eric keeps talking about "negative energy" that is too incomplete.
      >>>>
      >>>> The dominant 00 GR source term is (in isotropic case for now,
      >>>> ignore plate effects, ignore rotation)
      >>>>
      >>>> (energy density)(1 + 3w)
      >>>>
      >>>> w = pressure/(energy density)
      >>>>
      >>>> When w > -1/3, then you do need negative energy density to get
      >>>> repulsive anti-gravity, which is Eric's point I suppose.
      >>>>
      >>>> However, when w < -1/3, you need positive energy density to get
      >>>> repulsive anti-gravity.
      >>>>
      >>>> Now for zero point energy of all types from Lorentz covariance and
      >>>> equivalence principle minimal coupling, i.e. the generators of T4
      >>>> are locally gauged inducing the curvature field.
      >>>>
      >>>> w = -1 for isotropic distribution
      >>>>
      >>>> For Casimir plates oriented in 1-2 plane, De Witt's result cited by
      >>>> Puthoff for only the EM ZPF is
      >>>>
      >>>> t00 ~ -1, t11 ~ +1, t22 ~ + 1, t33 ~ -3
      >>>>
      >>>> The energy density between the plates is negative from excluded
      >>>> modes perpendicular to the plates.
      >>>> The longitudinal pressure is also negative and is 3x the energy
      >>>> density.
      >>>>
      >>>> OK, but what Eric Davis and Hal Puthoff & Co do not seem to
      >>>> understand, or at least, I have not seen them make this key point
      >>>> is:
      >>>>
      >>>> The electro-mechanical effect of the negative pressure term t33 is
      >>>> attractive, i.e. a quantum electro-mechanical SUCTION between the
      >>>> plates. However, the direct ZPF induced gravity effect of negative
      >>>> pressure is REPULSIVE in that direction, though usually it is much
      >>>> smaller than the electromechanical attraction.
      >>>>
      >>>> Just the opposite of course for t11 = t22 positive pressure, i.e.
      >>>> squeeze - stretch.
      >>>>
      >>>> The Casimir quantum electro-mechanical term is
      >>>>
      >>>> Casimir Force ~ x(hc/L^4)A
      >>>>
      >>>> x ~ pi^2/720 (from memory)
      >>>>
      >>>> A = area of plates, L is separation of plates along 3-axis
      >>>>
      >>>> Casimir inward acceleration of the plates IF not constrained
      >>>>
      >>>> a_c33 ~ - x(hc/L^4)A/M = xc^2(h/Mc)(A/L^4)
      >>
      >> M is mass of a plate
      >>
      >>>> The gravity ZPF term is from
      >>>>
      >>>> V(ZPF)33 = -c^2/\33L^2
      >>>>
      >>>> a_g33 = -dV33/dL = +2c^2/\33L
      >>>>
      >>>> /\ positive is repulsion, /\ negative is attraction
      >>>>
      >>>> In this anisotropic case the effective longitudinal w is +3
      >>>>
      >>>> V is negative making the effective /\33 positive
      >>>>
      >>>> /\33 = -(t00 + t33)(8piG/c^4) = x(8piG/c^4)(hc/L^4) = 8pix(Lp^2/L^4)
      >>>>
      >>>> a_g33 = 16pic^2xLp^2/L^3
      >>>>
      >>>> a_g33/a_c33 ~ [16pic^2xLp^2/L^3]/[xc^2(h/Mc)(A/L^4)] =
      >>>> [16piLp^2/L^3]/[(h/Mc)(A/L^4)]
      >>
      >> = [16piLp^2]/[(h/Mc)(A/L)] = [16piLp^2L]/[A(h/Mc)] = 16pi
      >> (Lp^2/A)(L/(h/Mc)
      >>
      >> = [(# Bekenstein-Hawking BITS)(Plate Separation/Compton Wavelength of
      >> Plate)]^-1 << 1
      >>
      >
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.