> Subject: Eric's STAIFF 2006 Talk & National Defense Issues

>

> Thanks Eric, I took a quick look. Looks useful I will get back to it.

> You are getting closer to my qualitative position already in my two

> books from 2002. Thank GOD(D) no mention of PV anymore! ;-)

>

> I am still skeptical whether we need branes or not. Maybe.

>

> I think all we need are ANYONS IN 2D films with a kind of Josephson

> Effect to control the local inflation vacuum coherence field - it's

> still with us of course because curved spacetime emerges from it in my

> theory. The reality of the alleged alien machines, that you and I

> agree about at least as a working hypothesis, means that the

> "Skinwalkers" or whoever have some "soft" "Aikido" way of manipulating

> the local geometrodynamic fields in the ship's fuselage perhaps

> directly with their minds the way Uri Geller bends metal? This, after

> all is what Ron, Kit, Hal et-al are interested in ultimately of course

> for reasons of Homeland Security.

>

> The basic gravity field consists of the four tetrad 1-form fields

>

> e^a = 1^a + Lp[(dTheta^a)(Phi^a) - (Theta^a)(dPhi)^a]

>

> a = 0,1,2,3

>

> The second term on RHS is the curved tetrad compensating gauge

> potential from locally gauging the translation group and also hiding

> the globally flat translational symmetries in the vacuum. This is

> basically a SPIN 1 theory with a SPIN 2 COMPOSITE from pairing in

>

> ds^2 = e^a(Minkowski)abe^b = guvdx^udx^v = Einstein's differential

> local invariant

>

> e^a = e^audx^u

>

> See http://arxiv.org/pdf/gr-qc/0602022

>

> d is Cartan exterior derivative, i.e. gradient on the EIGHT 0-form

> Goldstone phases Theta^a & Phi^a from hidden locally gauged symmetries

> in the vacuum giving rise to emergent geometrodynamic structures, e.g.

> curved space-time itself and perhaps Calabi-Yau -- "More is different"

> (P.W. Anderson). e^a is dimensionless hence the Lp factor.

>

> When all Goldstone phases vanish all we have is the unstable

> pre-inflation false globally flat vacuum out of which the Level 1

> Tegmark "bubbles" "nucleate" in eternal inflation populating all the

> nooks and crannies of Lenny Susskind's "Cosmic Landscape" that in FRW

> limit has "height /\" with about 10^500 valleys from the extra 6

> dimensions of the Calabi-Yau fiber space that seems to fit Gennady

> Shipov's 10D torsion manifold rather naturally. However, I seem to get

> a mass gap Meissner effect for the torsion quanta. Our universe in

> Lenny's megaverse is inside an expanding Hubble horizon on one of an

> infinity of bubbles in the false vacuum's hyperspace. "My Father's

> House has many mansions." BTW see the Hindu Vedas about ancient "Wars

> in Space" in addition to new alleged info from the Dead Sea Scrolls.

>

> When we also locally gauge the Lorentz group as well as the

> translation group we get 6 extra independent torsion field 1-form

> compensating gauge potentials

>

> &W^a^b = - &W^b^a ~ Lp[(dTheta^a)(Phi^b) - (Theta^a)(dPhi^b) -

> (dTheta^b)(Phi^a) + (Theta^b)(dPhi^a)]

>

> Note &W^a^a = 0

>

> This &W^a^b is an additional piece to the SIX ZERO TORSION SPIN

> CONNECTION 1-forms W^a^b

>

> W'^a^b = W^a^b(1915 GR) + &W^a^b

>

> i.e.

>

> D = d + W^ab/\

>

> D' = D + &W^av/\

>

> De^a = 0

>

> D'e^a =/= 0 = Shipov type of torsion 2-form (Kiehn has others I

> think)

>

> R^a^b = DW^a^b = curvature 2-form without torsion

>

> R'^a^b = D'W'^a^b = curvature 2-form with Shipov-type torsion.

>

> FAST FORWARD

> Control of dark energy for warp drive is via PHASE LOCK of ANYON

> CONDENSATE to VACUUM CONDENSATE in thin high Tc films nano-engineered

> into the the fuselages of the "alien craft" from universes next door

> in the megaverse.

>

>

> On Mar 1, 2006, at 11:41 AM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:

>

>> Just felt a small earthquake in San Francisco.

>>

>> On Mar 1, 2006, at 10:42 AM, Dr. Eric Davis wrote:

>>

>>> Jack:

>>>

>>> Everything I'm doing is strictly within GR theory. But you knew

>>> that already.

>>

>> I am not disputing that. I have not seen what you are doing in detail

>> since the USAF teleportation report that I liked except for your

>> promoting PV as a viable alternative to a frontal assault on metric

>> engineering with GR (extended to torsion I think). I think Hal should

>> keep PV buried - it is simply too incomplete and it violates the

>> LOCAL equivalence principle and tensor covariance. We can debate that

>> later. The deepest way into the equivalence is the local gauging of

>> all universal continuous space-time symmetries of ALL physical

>> dynamical actions. We also have additional choice of "hiding the

>> symmetry" (Sidney Coleman) in the physical vacuum. Note that R. Kiehn

>> has a paper http://arxiv.org/pdf/gr-qc/0602118 on using Cartan forms

>> for vacuum structure similar in spirit from my approach though his

>> math is much deeper than mine. He has been doing this kind of math

>> for many decades. I am still learning it.

>>

>>>

>>> Although, the attached third STAIF paper (and attached PP slides in

>>> PDF format) that I published and presented addresses being able to

>>> do warp drive from a D-brane perspective where positive energy and

>>> negative pressure are required to establish an FTL velocity boost.

>>> The lead author of the paper is a NASA-JSC robotics engineer working

>>> on his Ph.D. in GR physics at Rice Univ. under the supervision of

>>> one of Rindler's former grad students. He previously published an

>>> earlier version of this paper as a single author in GRG.

>>

>> Thanks will look at it. :-)

>>

>>>

>>> Eric

>>>

>>> Eric W. Davis, Ph.D., FBIS

>>> Inst. for Advanced Studies at Austin

>>> 4030 W. Braker Lane, Suite 300

>>> Austin, TX 78759

>>

>> CORRECTED DRAFT 3! (got Casimir-Gravity ratio wrong UPSIDE DOWN -

>> mechanical algebraic error)

>>>

>>>> From: Jack Sarfatti <sarfatti@...>

>>>> To: Gary Bekkum <garysbekkum@...>

>>>>

>>>> Subject: Fwd: STAIF 2006 Meeting Exotic Propulsion Minutes Date:

>>>> Tue, 28 Feb 2006 20:58:02 -0800

>>>>

>>>> ...

>>

>>>> Eric keeps talking about "negative energy" that is too incomplete.

>>>>

>>>> The dominant 00 GR source term is (in isotropic case for now,

>>>> ignore plate effects, ignore rotation)

>>>>

>>>> (energy density)(1 + 3w)

>>>>

>>>> w = pressure/(energy density)

>>>>

>>>> When w > -1/3, then you do need negative energy density to get

>>>> repulsive anti-gravity, which is Eric's point I suppose.

>>>>

>>>> However, when w < -1/3, you need positive energy density to get

>>>> repulsive anti-gravity.

>>>>

>>>> Now for zero point energy of all types from Lorentz covariance and

>>>> equivalence principle minimal coupling, i.e. the generators of T4

>>>> are locally gauged inducing the curvature field.

>>>>

>>>> w = -1 for isotropic distribution

>>>>

>>>> For Casimir plates oriented in 1-2 plane, De Witt's result cited by

>>>> Puthoff for only the EM ZPF is

>>>>

>>>> t00 ~ -1, t11 ~ +1, t22 ~ + 1, t33 ~ -3

>>>>

>>>> The energy density between the plates is negative from excluded

>>>> modes perpendicular to the plates.

>>>> The longitudinal pressure is also negative and is 3x the energy

>>>> density.

>>>>

>>>> OK, but what Eric Davis and Hal Puthoff & Co do not seem to

>>>> understand, or at least, I have not seen them make this key point

>>>> is:

>>>>

>>>> The electro-mechanical effect of the negative pressure term t33 is

>>>> attractive, i.e. a quantum electro-mechanical SUCTION between the

>>>> plates. However, the direct ZPF induced gravity effect of negative

>>>> pressure is REPULSIVE in that direction, though usually it is much

>>>> smaller than the electromechanical attraction.

>>>>

>>>> Just the opposite of course for t11 = t22 positive pressure, i.e.

>>>> squeeze - stretch.

>>>>

>>>> The Casimir quantum electro-mechanical term is

>>>>

>>>> Casimir Force ~ x(hc/L^4)A

>>>>

>>>> x ~ pi^2/720 (from memory)

>>>>

>>>> A = area of plates, L is separation of plates along 3-axis

>>>>

>>>> Casimir inward acceleration of the plates IF not constrained

>>>>

>>>> a_c33 ~ - x(hc/L^4)A/M = xc^2(h/Mc)(A/L^4)

>>

>> M is mass of a plate

>>

>>>> The gravity ZPF term is from

>>>>

>>>> V(ZPF)33 = -c^2/\33L^2

>>>>

>>>> a_g33 = -dV33/dL = +2c^2/\33L

>>>>

>>>> /\ positive is repulsion, /\ negative is attraction

>>>>

>>>> In this anisotropic case the effective longitudinal w is +3

>>>>

>>>> V is negative making the effective /\33 positive

>>>>

>>>> /\33 = -(t00 + t33)(8piG/c^4) = x(8piG/c^4)(hc/L^4) = 8pix(Lp^2/L^4)

>>>>

>>>> a_g33 = 16pic^2xLp^2/L^3

>>>>

>>>> a_g33/a_c33 ~ [16pic^2xLp^2/L^3]/[xc^2(h/Mc)(A/L^4)] =

>>>> [16piLp^2/L^3]/[(h/Mc)(A/L^4)]

>>

>> = [16piLp^2]/[(h/Mc)(A/L)] = [16piLp^2L]/[A(h/Mc)] = 16pi

>> (Lp^2/A)(L/(h/Mc)

>>

>> = [(# Bekenstein-Hawking BITS)(Plate Separation/Compton Wavelength of

>> Plate)]^-1 << 1

>>

>