Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Universal Resonance Hypothesis

Expand Messages
  • Russell E. Rierson
    Theoretical physicist Richard Feynman derived the sum over histories interpretation of quantum mechanics, where a system does not have a single history, but
    Message 1 of 1 , May 1, 2004
    • 0 Attachment
      Theoretical physicist Richard Feynman derived the "sum over
      histories" interpretation of quantum mechanics, where a system does
      not have a single history, but it has every possible history, and
      each history has its own probability amplitude. For example, an
      electron travels from point A to point B by every possible route at
      once. Each possible route or "path" corresponds to a history.

      The amplitude for each history defines the probability of that
      particular path being followed. The number involves the "action"
      associated with the history-path, which seems to determine that the
      path taken, will be the history closest to the "classical"
      trajectory, in accordance with the law of conservation of energy.

      Stephen Hawking explains that when we apply the Feynman sum over
      histories to particles moving in a background of spacetime, we must
      also include histories[waveforms] in which the particle travels
      backwards in time. This generates the spacetime resonance:

      If particles of energy and matter can be described as spherical
      standing waves, vibrations emerging out of of the vacuum itself, the
      equivalence of inertial mass and gravitational mass could be easily

      (<-(<-(P)->)->) and (->(->(P)<-)<-) becomes (<-(->(P)<-)->)

      A particle is then at standing wave resonance.

      If the particle is moving at a constant velocity, it is at a balanced

      If the particle is accelerated, or is in the presence of a massive
      object it experiences time dilation and length contraction:


      Distance is a property between objects in space. Duration is a
      distance between events in time. Spacetime is a relational structure;

      The structure of space is possibly a Boolean lattice.

      Sets can be represented by Venn diagrams.

      Venn diagrams can be represented as light cone cross sections.
      The "universal set" is represented by the the universal lightcone!


      Past and future intersect at the present. A system at standing wave

      If the locality principle is not going to be thrown into the trash
      heap, then a viable option is that space is something analogous to
      homogeneously distributed probability density functions(a perfect
      fluid?) i.e. increasing density gradients, giving the observed
      thermodynamic arrow of time. The observed cosmic expansion is
      a "relative" one! A "perspective effect" from our local vantage
      point. A shrinking object gives the illusion of receding motion.
      Increasing *refractive* density gradients give the appearence of a
      doppler-red-shift. Space increases density as Shannon entropy

      Spacetime then "remembers" the input! A quantum measurement is made,
      the action principle demands the shortest distance between two points
      be taken, whatever that may be. There is no instantaneous action at a

      So what we observe as an absolute spacetime expansion is not really
      true. The expansion is relative. From a local perspective, the
      universe appears to expand with radius R. From a global perspective
      energy density is compressed with radius 1/R.

      At the Planck scales space becomes a type of Bose Einstein

      A quantum mechanical theory of black holes could point towards a type
      of bose Einstein condensation instead of a singularity.

      Richard Feynman explains that a positron which is an anti matter
      particle corresponding to the matter particle called the electron,
      can also be interpreted as an electron moving backwards in time.
      This points towards a system[universe] at temporal "standing wave"

      Quantum mechanics leads us to the realization that all matter-energy
      can be explained in terms of "waves". In a confined region(i.e. a
      closed universe or a black hole) the waves exists as STANDING WAVES
      In a closed system, the entropy never decreases.

      The analogy with black holes is an interesting one but if there is
      nothing outside the universe, then it cannot be radiating energy
      outside itself as black holes are explained to be. So the amount of
      information i.e. "quantum states" in the universe is increasing. We
      see it as entropy, but to an information processor with huge
      computational capabilities, it is compressible information.

      Quantum field theory calculations where imaginary time is periodic,
      with period 1/T are equivalent to statistical mechanics calculations
      where the temperature is T. The periodic waveforms that are opposed
      yet "in phase" would be at standing wave resonance, giving the action.

      What kind of waves are possible inside a black hole? The answer is
      standing waves, waves that "fit" inside the black hole with a node at
      the event horizon. The possible wave states are very similar to
      standing waves on a circular drum; they aren't quite the same because
      the black hole standing waves exist in three dimensions instead of
      just the two of the drum head.
      These waves intersections are increasing with time. A type of
      compression force.

      Waves are ripples in a basic medium. Einstein explains that the ether
      is unecessary as a medium, so the ripples are vibrations of spacetime

      Space is at right angles to time.

      Electricity is at right angles to magnetism.

      Gravity is at right angles to inertia.

      All are aspects of one unified field.

      Wavefronts = cotangent vectors = one forms

      The wave function for a the quantum compression wave could be
      analogous to the quantum spring equation:

      psi = exp(-beta x^2 / 2),

      with beta = 2 pi * square root(mk) / h, with m being the mass of the
      particle attached to the spring, k is the spring's force constant,
      and h is Planck's constant.
      x is the compression or extension of the spring from its equilibrium
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.