Re: variation of alpha, Einstein-Wheeler-Bohm
- Newton realized that the fall of the apple was the same as the motion
of the Earth around the Sun. That was his Alchemical “As Above So
Below.” I have shown that the Galactic Halo holds the stars together in
the same way, through negative zero point energy density with equal and
opposite positive quantum pressure, that the electron’s distributed
repulsive electric charge is held together. As Above So Below again.
from Super Cosmos http://qedcorp.com/destiny/
On Feb 29, 2004, at 4:04 PM, Carlos Castro wrote:
> Dear Gary, Jack and Tony :
> Thank you very much Tony for those references.
> The variable fine structure constant story in my paper
> is based on maximal-acceleration relativistic effects,
> assuming that this maximal-acceleration relativity
> theory in phases spaces is truly a NEW phenomenon
> which occurs in Nature.
> I used the Friedmann-Robertson-Walker metric plus
> conformal scaling corrections stemming from the
> maximal-acceleration condition which is
> Maximal acceleration = c^2 / L_p
> L_p = Planck scale.
> You also have a maximal-angular velocity in Nature
> like in the rotation of spiral galaxies, etc given by
> omega = c/L_p.
Of course it may be that the effective Lp* >> Lp as it is in my theory.
So this notion of maximal acceleration might be directly testable.
For example, I propose Lp* ~ 1 fermi inside the spatially extended
electron as the "dark matter" random zero point energy positive
pressure "vortex core" where "vacuum coherence" drops to zero in the
"coherence length". The zero point energy induced strong short range
attractive gravity then stabilizes the self-electric charge and
spin-rotation of the electron as a kind of quasi-Kerr-Newman quantum
"micro-geon" (A. Burinskii) with the zero point energy induced electron
rest mass m of the order
m ~ (e/c)^2Lp*^-1 = (e/c)^2Lp*^-1|/\zpf|^1/2 ~ 1 Mev/c^2
where vacuum coherence -> 0 inside the electron vortex ring core.
This is a pure Wheeler geometrodynamic exotic vacuum "Mass without
mass" "Charge without charge" picture with an effective shor- range
Sakharov zero point energy induced G* ~ 10^40G(Newton) inside the
The problem of the stability of the repulsive self-charge of the
electron of 100 years ago is solved. There are no longer infinite
renormalizations of QED needed. Feynman first got me thinking about all
this in his office at Cal Tech in 1968 when he helped on my PhD ideas.
He first tried to solve this problem as an undergrad at MIT. Also
Herbert Frohlich told me in 1967 at UCSD around same time that PW
Anderson came there to give his "More is different talk" (I was back
from Harwell then where I did the Goldstone/Jahn-Teller broken symmetry
paper with Stoneham in Proc Phys Soc London) that THE BIG ERROR in
physics was thinking of the electron as a point particle.
This picture fits "Einstein's Vision" as described by Wheeler in his
book "Geometrodynamics" and in his UCSD visits and his talks at
Heisenberg's Munich Institute I attended in Summer 1966. I also fits
Bohm's hidden variable intepretation and J.P. Vigier's theory of "tight
atomic states" leading perhaps to the larger atomic energy release that
Maric et-al were looking for in Beograd although I do not think they
My idea is also consistent with the point-like Feynman "parton" picture
of lepto-quark imaging at high magnification (deep inelastic electron
scattering) because of well known GR property that the interior volume
is larger than the surface area would lead one to expect using flat
Euclidean geometry. For example in the SSS vacuum solution
dC/dR = 2pi(1 - 2G*mp/hc^2)^1/2
p = scattering momentum transfer between probe and target m
where h/p > 2G*m/c^2
G* ~ 10^40 G(Newton)
replace m by (e/c)^2|/\zpf|^1/2 for example.
The effective SHRINKING size of the real lepto-quark target inside the
hadron bag of "QCD Lite" (F. Wilczek) is of order
(h/mc)[1 - 2|/\zpf|^1/2(p/h)]^1/2
where h/p > |/\zpf|^-1/2
> Max Born many years ago also suggested the Dual
> Relativity Principle applied to phase spaces. So if
> there is an upper bound on velocities, there should be
> a bound of momentum, forces in Nature. Later on this
> lead to the Born-Infeld description of
> Electrodynamics. QM involves phase spaces.
> I believe we must look at new physics and entirely
> new ideas to figure out all this stuff about
> variations of the constants in Nature, dark matter,
> etc.... As I've said, the conformal-boosts are linked
> to accelerated hyperbolic trajectories.
Yes, I also sense that is important but I am not clear how.
I think we need to locally gauge ALL 15 generators of the Lie Algebra of
the Conformal group.
> My gut feeling is that all matter in the Universe may
> have been created out of the vaccum due to
> cosmological acceleration effects ( Unruh-Rindler
> effect ). I discuss this in the IJMPA paper.
> Thank you once again
> Best wishes
On Feb 29, 2004, at 7:20 PM, Tony Smith wrote:
> Jack, you ask
> "... can we get a consistent solution where H(t) is
> constant to a good approximation so that
> a(t) ~ a(0)e^Hot
> without violating all the precision cosmology "concordance"
> observations? ...".
> According to one of the illustrations from the web page at
> a copy of which is attached to this message
> "... This diagram reveals changes in the rate of expansion
> since the universe's birth 15 billion years ago.
> The more shallow the curve, the faster the rate of expansion.
> The curve changes noticeably about 7.5 billion years ago ...".
> As you can see, the curve is not a cone (rotated line)
> but is convex/concave (rotated curve with inflection point),
> due to the facts that
> just before about 7.5 billion years ago the expansion was decelerating
> ever since that inflection point about 7.5 billion years ago the
> expansion has been (and still is) accelerating.
> Doesn't that rule out the linear (in log time) equation
> about which you ask?
Yes, I think it does. I did not think that was a correct idea to begin
I am struggling with apparently wrong requirement that things like mass
and Regge slope may be cosmic time dependent if we use ideas suggested
by the holographic universe conjecture. But my thinking here may well
like Hal's is on metric engineering. None of us are immune. :-)
- It seems that the group around Jack Sarfatti and in German the group
working on the Heim theory are on the best way. But I am no expert
to give a ranking here.:-) I only work on simple but cool stuff what
may come before your star trek sufi physics stuff. Maybe I can help
you though both groups.
From: "Berkant" <bronzadam@y...>
Date: Mon Mar 1, 2004 3:13 am
Subject: Communication and Navigation in a Conscious Universe
Friends, let us consider ideas which are far behind the visions of
the star trek creators. Let us go behind simple approaches excluding
sensitive areas like consciousness. Let us find ways to communicate
and navigate in a conscious universe.
Of course, if we only want exotic crafts within the atmosphere we
could stop this discussion here. If we do not want to pass the speed
of light and if we are happy with atmospheric plasma propulsions for
instance, we can stop here. But if we really want to go to the
stars, we should find ways to merge the proven knowledge of science
and mysticism. I am so far now to say there is no way out.
Yes, let us think about the needs to make the star travel dream
reality. I think from a mystical point of view there are strong
arguments for scientists who are saying that there is need for
conscious flying saucer machines to enter the gates to the stars by
Why?? And is there a plausible explanation for this utopic looking
desire from a worldly scientific point of view? I would say no! Most
approaches discussed here would also say no. But there is a
plausible explanation from spiritual point of view.
Yes, it is sufi wisdom saying that on a cellular level, angels are
assigned to each cell, each molecule and each atom. That angel
is "observing" that object for which it has been assigned. This is
what keeps that object in particle for, i.e. in existence. This
makes our universe conscious. It is conscious from the highest level
down. Yes, and once that assigned angel leaves that task by divine
order, that object is no longer under observation and thus is
rendered back to its wave nature in the ocean of power, and our Lord
And you will ask what has this all to do with interstellar travel??
I will give you a story from a sufi site first to assist your
"Once a lady came to a saint, crying "my son is in a ship at sea,
and it has capsized and he doesn't know how to swim. Please help
him." Immediately the Shaykh reached out his hand and when he drew
it back he was holding the woman's son in his hand, and his arm was
We have already seen that with the power of light, a wali may use
his wave-body to move at the speed of light. At the location of the
foundering ship, the wali renders his arm into its particle form,
grasps this boy and then renders himself to wave-form and move his
arm and the boy to his mosque, where he rendered his arm and the
child back into particle state. The essence of this is to stop the
effect of observation on himself, ie. The angels of the cells of the
body, continue to observer his particle but using a method similar
to that of the reverse polarizer being placed at the final location,
the operations takes place while the shaykh is not under
observation, he retrieves the child and returns, restoring himself
and the child to "particle" form."
First you need to know how to communicate with the consciousness in
the universe. If you know how to communicate then you have also
solved the problem of navigation. Otherwise I can't see a way to
reach the stars. Maybe you would enter but you would never come out
with your worldly body. You would end in a disaster. So what do you
You probably need a living machine which knows the keys and knows to
communicate with spiritual watchers or you need a pilot which knows
it better through his spiritual powers. This view may dramatically
differ from the Star Trek point of view. And to be honest I
personally do not believe that it will work without an adept machine
or an adept pilot.
But what would give a machine consciousness?
A djinn or angel having the right skin enbedded environment maybe?
Are we ready to do it now? Maybe, maybe not? But maybe soon.
Yes, you could order a djinn or angel to take control of your craft.
This may be the key to true "artificial" intelligence. It would be
truly intelligent but taken in an artifical or manmade environment.
But who has the power to do this then? Not easy question if you ask
me. Imagine you have done it, maybe with the help of an adept
interested in worldly science. In this case the scientist could
order the intelligent being to make contact with the spiritual realm
company centers which are in existence according to sufi wisdom. And
voila, you would open the gates to heavens and hells.
In this case you would not only have a gate opener but also a
competent navigator. Are these the real keys to interstellar travel?
If you do not have an adept pilot which is in connection with
the spiritual centers, then at least you would need someone who can
communicate with the living machine. Or you need an advanced
technology to communicate with the on-board djinn. Don't ask me what
djinns are. Be inspired by hollywood movies. The word genius is
derived from djin because any genius is inspired by djins. Maybe
these are graviphotonic beings. I do not know. But they may
unconsciously communicate with our brains. Maybe there are others
who can communicate consciously. I do not know.
As Jack once indicated, if you want to base your craft on pure
technology and don't want to use a pilot with spiritual powers, you
need to develop a communication technology with djinn like beings.
It is sufi prediction that this will be possible. Maybe it is
already developed. Maybe it is a kind of brain wave control
interface. I do not know. But it is also sufi belief that it
won't work by technology to communicate with angels. This is too
subtle for technology. So there is a strict border which you can't
pass without spiritual power. What does this mean again?
It probably means that it depends on the abilities of your pilot
and/or machine how far you can reach to the hidden worlds. There
could be at least 18000 worlds mentioned in sufi wisdom. Worlds
known to saints. So if you want to go very deep it probably won't
work with pure technology. You need to activate your spiritual
abilities or call it your spiritual technology.
Maybe one day in a golden age we all will learn to use our bodies
which in principal are able to move at the speed of light, in which
time stops, and that is why after the entire traversal from Makkah
to Jerusalem, and then to the heights of Heavens, Prophet Muhammad
returned in what to an observer would have been an instant, for it
is said, that as he returned, the water which he had spilled upon
being woken by Jibreel (as), was still falling, and upon his return
the Prophet's bed was still warm.
I do not know whether Star Trek has any of these ideas adopted. But
I think it is worth to think about those topics. We need serious
discussions about conscious and holographic universe problems. Only
then we will find a way to the stars. This is my opinion. It is your
choise to ignore it or to be inspired by the
"Turn off the observers" allowing you to travel as a wave, attaining
your pure light aspect, achieving atemporal existence, and present
at every time and every place that the creation has reached since
its advent at the Big Bang.
And this may also apply to craft driven by technology but only if
being able to communicate with the conscious universe.
- Forward from greenglow list:
> > Yes, it is sufi wisdom saying that on a cellular level, angelsare
> > assigned to each cell, each molecule and each atom.mind
> As a theoretical physicist the first question that comes to my
> what is the equation that describes angels, and what is the
> that describes their "assigment" to particular cells, moleculesand
> Without equations it sounds like a fairy tale. Berkant, you
> have some ideas, so why not share them?Maybe it's better to consider all a fairy tale than asking such a
high level question.:-) This is equal to asking about the secrets of
life and death. Nevertheless it is a fair question. But a question
which will arise more and more questions than answers. So we can try
and ask what are djinns and what are angels first.
Yes, psychic people often confuse djinns and angels.
Maybe there are some similarities but also differences.
Djinns have a free will and may or may not obey the Lord of Heavens,
but angels have no free will and always obey the Lord of Heavens.
Therefore the question of an angel disobeying the Lord of Heavens
does not arise. This further supplements that Iblis (Satan) was a
djinn and not an angel.
It is my intuition telling me that djinns are pure electron beings
or electron cluster beings. Some of you may know the plasma machine
ideas of Ken Shoulders in this context. Maybe this all is again
imagination but maybe it can help us to speculate about possible
artificially intelligent machines here. Why?
Think about our all day machines. Think about our computers.
How are they all working? All need electricity. Not one machine
today which is not working with electricity. So what is electricity?
We imagine flowing electrons in our transistors and all other
electronic machine parts. But what are really electrons?
Something materialized or something waving like light or both?
There are so many different theories for the electron.
Now we ask again what does it mean when on a cellular level, angels
are assigned to each cell, each molecule and each atom.
I want to give you an excerpt from an adept sufi master who is
saying the following in this context:
"From all the above discussion, it is apparent that the act of
observation of the angels of the cells and particles of human beings
is what "activates" their existence on the plane of the
The living has a body and a soul. The dead has a soul but no body.
The soul is the "energy" form, or light-body. The primary difference
between these two is that the angels have been removed from the
body. It is those angels, which are there in any living creature,
whose act of observation cause an object to maintain its particle
form. Once these angels are removed the observation ceases and the
soul is rendered to its energy form and moves freely.
That energy, the soul, is still there."
I hope this helps. As a scientist I would also ask questions about
graviphotons. Where do they come from? And where do we come from?
I think it was Phythagoras who described geometry as visual music.
Maybe angels are playing the music of light whatever this means I do
not know. Saints often say that they hear the music of angels. They
say it is the music of the heart. What can this be? Is it visual
music or music as we know it, I do not know.
Just like you so me, only inspired.