## Re: The Aquino System-H : ELF or UHF?

Expand Messages
• Prof. DeAquino published a new paper presenting experiments with a 60 kg iron ball. From: blaze_labs Date: Fri May 31, 2002 9:56 am
Message 1 of 12 , Jun 1, 2002
• 0 Attachment
Prof. DeAquino published a new paper presenting experiments with a 60
kg iron ball.

From: "blaze_labs" <blaze_labs@y...>
Date: Fri May 31, 2002 9:56 am
Subject: Re: The Aquino System-H : ELF or UHF?

Hi all,

Let me try to clear this ELF sitiuation. First of all have a look at

Band, Nomenclature, Frequency, Wavelength
ELF Extremely Low Frequency 3 - 30 Hz 100,000 - 10,000 km
SLF Super Low Frequency 30 - 300 Hz 10,000 - 1,000 km
ULF Ultra Low Frequency 300 - 3000 Hz 1,000 - 100 km
VLF Very Low Frequency 3 - 30 kHz 100 - 10 km
LF Low Frequency 30 - 300 kHz 10 - 1 km
MF Medium Frequency 300 - 3000 kHz 1 km - 100 m
HF High Frequency 3 - 30 MHz 100 - 10 m
VHF Very High Frequency 30 - 300 MHz 10 - 1 m
UHF Ultra High Frequency 300 - 3000 MHz 1 m - 10 cm
SHF Super High Frequency 3 - 30 GHz 10 - 1 cm
EHF Extremely High Frequency 30 - 300 GHz 1 cm - 1 mm

o.k. so Aquino's system is using 9.9milliHertz = 9.9E-3Hz, which goes
even lower than the standard ELF, but since this frequency band is
not defined as a radio band, it can still be called ELF.

Now, let me explain why 9.9mHz is FAR FROM dc, especially in Fran DE
Aquino's setup. What might look as ELF is actually UHF. To understand
this I suggest you read my ideas at:

http://bel.150m.com/biefeld.htm

especially from the heading 'Spacetime warping' onwards.

In his paper Fran De Aquino says that the high refractive index of
iron is slowing down the speed of light to less than 0.1m/s. My
version is that the refractive index creates a spacetime frame in
which effective lengths get shorter when viewed from our reference
spacetime frame due to time dilation. The actual speed of light does
not change within the dielectric but time dilation occurs. This is
supported 100% by Einstein's theory of relativity. Saying that speed
of light changes goes against Einsteins theory.

Anyway, at the end of the day, whether you state that speed of light
slows down, or time & effective lengths got shorter, all De Aquino's
equations remain unchanged.

So, what is the REAL frequency acting on the iron atoms:

From Aquino's equation 12:

Velocity of wave within the sphere is 1.386E-3m/s
Refractive index = c/v= 2.16E11
Time dilation/ length change = 1/n = 4.62E-12

So time rate has slowed down by 4.62E-12 of 'our time rate'
Also, the lengths within the new frame got shorter by 4.62E-12

Wavelength for 9.9mHz in freespace is 3.03E10m
REAL wavelength = 3.03E10 x 4.62E-12 = 0.14m

If you 'view' this wavelength WITHIN the dielectric time frame, you
will see a frequency of:

f= c/wavelength = 2.14E9 = 2.14Giga Hertz!! - UHF band

And this is the actual frequency acting at the atomic level.

NOTE: the REAL frequency and wavelengths in action are not the same
as those seen by an observer outside the spacetime frame. So, what
might look as almost dc might look much different as it enters
Aquino's setup.

Best Regards,
Saviour.

--- In Lifters@y..., Marinescu Cristian <marinec3@y...> wrote:
>
> --- "August R. Wohlt" <yahoo@i...> wrote:
> > Um, can someone explain to me how 9.9mHz can be
> > considered ELF? If
> > that's milliHertz and not megaHertz, then this is
> > pretty much
> > straight DC...
> >
>
>
>
> Yea..if it's millihertz than what is the difference
> between such AC current and a DC current? The werry
> slow down of the sine wave?9.9 mHz, that means an
> oscilation every 100 secs. That's one.
>
> Two: I also subscribe for a video as Saviour and
> Antony said.
>
> Tree: Not only a video will be enough, but some
> construction details for a full replication even at a
> smaller scale .I don't think that if the
> setup is so simple as in that picture, nobody will be
> able to measure at least few grams of loosed weight.
>
> And Four: what happened with Sys-G device? It becamed
> secret or what?
>
> Best regards,
> Cristian
>
>
>
>
> --- "August R. Wohlt" <yahoo@i...> wrote:
> > Um, can someone explain to me how 9.9mHz can be
> > considered ELF? If
> > that's milliHertz and not megaHertz, then this is
> > pretty much
> > straight DC...
> >
> > On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 08:04:13PM -0000, blaze_labs
> > wrote:
> > > Woow!,
> > >
> > > This is 100% pure antigravity. Am I missing
> > something (or too excited
> > > after reading this), or this genious found a way
> > to develop an
> > > equivalent thrust of 1000N at an input power of
> > 829 microwatts? We
> > > should definetely replicate these results.
> > >
> > > BR
> > > Saviour
• From: blaze_labs Date: Fri May 31, 2002 10:26 am Subject: Re: The Aquino System-H : ELF or UHF? ADVERTISEMENT Hi Christian, I know it
Message 2 of 12 , Jun 1, 2002
• 0 Attachment
From: "blaze_labs" <blaze_labs@y...>
Date: Fri May 31, 2002 10:26 am
Subject: Re: The Aquino System-H : ELF or UHF?

Hi Christian,

I know it is hard to beleive, but the actual voltage & current
oscillations WITHIN the dipole itself are NOT 9.9mHz but 2.14Ghz. In
my calculations you see that I derived the full wavelength of 0.14m,
which correlates exactly to De Aquino's half wavelength dipole of
0.07m (70mm). The dipole is resonant at 2.14Ghz and not at 9.9mHz,
thrust me. So, the big question is - at what point does this
frequency change occurs. The last point you can detect the 9.9mHz
signal is at the dipole feed point, the first point you can detect
the 2.14Ghz is along the dipole elements, quite tricky but real.

Regards,
Saviour.

--- In Lifters@y..., Marinescu Cristian <marinec3@y...> wrote:
> Yea Saviour, I agree,
>
> but still you have a current of 9,9millihertz
> entering to the dipole..isn't it?
>
> Cristian
>
> --- blaze_labs <blaze_labs@y...> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Let me try to clear this ELF sitiuation. First of
> > all have a look at
> > the radio band classification
• We could also use the carbonly iron layer applied on the F-117 stealth fighter. One can order such pulver of tiny coated micron sized iron spheres from BASF.
Message 3 of 12 , Jun 1, 2002
• 0 Attachment
We could also use the carbonly iron layer applied on the F-117
stealth fighter. One can order such pulver of tiny coated micron
sized iron spheres from BASF.

It absorbs microwaves excellently. But what is generated then.
In the theory of Burkhard Heim EM waves can be converted into
gravitational waves. He already suggested experiments based on Prof.
Schumann's radar technology to convert microwaves into g-waves. This
was in the 50s.

I think it was a torus shaped device. Is Prof. DeAquino after
something real?

What is the link to the recent work of Prof. Ciao from Berkeley?
• From: Bruno Tilgner Date: Fri May 31, 2002 8:16 pm Subject: Zinc sulphide ADVERTISEMENT In it Aquino mentions of using zinc sulphide doped
Message 4 of 12 , Jun 1, 2002
• 0 Attachment
From: Bruno Tilgner <btilgner@s...>
Date: Fri May 31, 2002 8:16 pm
Subject: Zinc sulphide

In it Aquino mentions of using zinc sulphide doped with silver to be
charged electrically over a metallic surface. Given your current
Lifters functioing with zinc this wouldn't seem to be much of a
stretch of current SOPs.

Regards,

Bruno
-----Original Message-----
From: Bruno Tilgner [mailto:btilgner@...]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 2:12 PM
To: 'Lifters@yahoogroups.com'
Subject: [Lifters] Phosphorescent Lifters?

Hi Saviour,

While we're on the topic of Aquino's work what about adding a
luminescent layer onto a Lifter and bathing it in UV light to see if
we can generate added Lift. Any thoughts on this?

Regards,

Bruno
http://www.elo.com.br/~deaquino/Gravitational%20Shielding.pdf

http://www.elo.com.br/~deaquino/A%20Possibility%20of%20Control.pdf

--- In SarfattiScienceSeminar@y..., "hizlimurat" <hizlimurat@y...>
wrote:
>
> We could also use the carbonly iron layer applied on the F-117
> stealth fighter. One can order such pulver of tiny coated micron
> sized iron spheres from BASF.
>
> It absorbs microwaves excellently. But what is generated then.
> In the theory of Burkhard Heim EM waves can be converted into
> gravitational waves. He already suggested experiments based on
Prof.
> Schumann's radar technology to convert microwaves into g-waves.
This
> was in the 50s.
>
> I think it was a torus shaped device. Is Prof. DeAquino after
> something real?
>
> What is the link to the recent work of Prof. Ciao from Berkeley?
• From: Barry Turner Date: Sat Jun 1, 2002 3:09 am Subject: TR-3B Magnetic Field Disrupter ADVERTISEMENT Hi I found this while browsing
Message 5 of 12 , Jun 1, 2002
• 0 Attachment
From: "Barry Turner" <btba09418@b...>
Date: Sat Jun 1, 2002 3:09 am
Subject: TR-3B Magnetic Field Disrupter

Hi

I found this while browsing the Daily Grail. Strikes me as very
similar to the Indian Vimanas that have been described so perhaps
there is something in it after all.

The Air Force has a non-secret that the news media cannot legally
report. However, hundreds of people have seen it fly. And fly it can
because it uses a gravity neutralization system that makes it weigh
89% of its original weight. [This is of course hard to believe unless
you are aware of the fact that each year the United States government
confiscates 6,000 patents a year. For decades the us government has
confiscated any patent that related to anti-gravity.] The TR-3B has a
circular, plasma filled accelerator ring called the Magnetic Field
Disrupter. The mercury based plasma is pressurized at 250,000
atmospheres at a temperature of 150 degrees Kelvin, and accelerated
to 50,000 rpm to create a super-conductive plasma with the resulting
gravity disruption.

The MFD generates a magnetic vortex field, which disrupts or
neutralizes the effects of gravity on mass within proximity, by 89
percent making the vehicle extremely light, and able to outperform
and outmanoeuvre any craft. Like other high performance aircraft, the
manoeuvres are limited to the ability of the crew to withstand G
forces. But, inside the TR-3B the G forces are also reduced by 89%.
Thus the crew of the TR-3B can perform a 40G manoeuvre with the crew
feeling 4.2 Gs.

The TR-3Bs propulsion is provided by 3 multimode thrusters mounted at
each bottom corner of the triangular platform. The TR-3 is a sub-Mach
9 vehicle until it reaches altitudes above l20,000 feet - then who
knows how fast it can go!

http://www.handpen.com/Bio/gravity.htm

http://fouchemedia.com/arap/speech.htm

I thought that this was an interesting fact, but didn't see how it
could possibly relate to antigravity, until I ran across the
following article: "Guidelines to Antigravity" by Dr. Robert Forward,
written in 1962 (available at:
http://www.whidbey.com/forward/pdf/tp007.pdf).

P.S. Dr. Forward has also written a number of other articles that may
be of interest to readers of this list. They are located at:

http://www.whidbey.com/forward/TechPubs.html
• Hi Barry, then let us find those ways to reduce the effect of gravity. Coatings may be a key issue. Let s study DeAquino, Gebrenikov etc. And also the chiral
Message 6 of 12 , Jun 1, 2002
• 0 Attachment
Hi Barry,

then let us find those ways to reduce the effect of gravity.
Coatings may be a key issue. Let's study DeAquino, Gebrenikov etc.
And also the chiral matter stuff introduced by Ron Kita.

Woow, we could use lifter technology to drive the craft then.
With ionic "flaps" you can make extreme maneuvers as we can see with
our lifters.

Do you think the Belgian ufo from 1988 was such kind of a hybrid??

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Lifters/message/3435

http://www.alien.de/cenap/belgien/belgien4a.htm

Up to date I do not understand the function of the pulsating center
sphere glowing in a red colour. See the picture at the page above.

This craft fascinated me in 1994. Since then I am after it.:-)

Best regards,
Berkant

--- In Lifters@y..., "Barry Turner" <btba09418@b...> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I found this while browsing the Daily Grail. Strikes me as very
similar to the Indian Vimanas that have been described so perhaps
there is something in it after all.
>
> The Air Force has a non-secret that the news media cannot legally
report. However, hundreds of people have seen it fly. And fly it can
because it uses a gravity neutralization system that makes it weigh
89% of its original weight. [This is of course hard to believe unless
you are aware of the fact that each year the United States government
confiscates 6,000 patents a year. For decades the us government has
confiscated any patent that related to anti-gravity.] The TR-3B has a
circular, plasma filled accelerator ring called the Magnetic Field
Disrupter. The mercury based plasma is pressurized at 250,000
atmospheres at a temperature of 150 degrees Kelvin, and accelerated
to 50,000 rpm to create a super-conductive plasma with the resulting
gravity disruption.
>
> The MFD generates a magnetic vortex field, which disrupts or
neutralizes the effects of gravity on mass within proximity, by 89
percent making the vehicle extremely light, and able to outperform
and outmanoeuvre any craft. Like other high performance aircraft, the
manoeuvres are limited to the ability of the crew to withstand G
forces. But, inside the TR-3B the G forces are also reduced by 89%.
Thus the crew of the TR-3B can perform a 40G manoeuvre with the crew
feeling 4.2 Gs.
>
> The TR-3Bs propulsion is provided by 3 multimode thrusters mounted
at each bottom corner of the triangular platform. The TR-3 is a sub-
Mach 9 vehicle until it reaches altitudes above l20,000 feet - then
who knows how fast it can go!
>
> http://www.handpen.com/Bio/gravity.htm
>
> http://fouchemedia.com/arap/speech.htm
>
> I thought that this was an interesting fact, but didn't see how it
could possibly relate to antigravity, until I ran across the
following article: "Guidelines to Antigravity" by Dr. Robert Forward,
written in 1962 (available at:
http://www.whidbey.com/forward/pdf/tp007.pdf).
>
> P.S. Dr. Forward has also written a number of other articles that
may be of interest to readers of this list. They are located at:
>
> http://www.whidbey.com/forward/TechPubs.html
Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.