> At 10:25 AM 7/5/01 -0400, Dan Smith wrote:

you are

> >Karl,

> >

> >>From the confusion in your statements below, it is evident that

> >ignorant of the Anthropic Cosmological Principle. This is a very

major

> >shortcoming in your scientific education. The fact that every

student of

> >science is not thoroughly exposed to this most important fact about

the

> >universe does indeed imply a 'conspiracy' of a materialistically

based

> >ignorance.

Anthropic

> >

>

> I am going to make this a bit short. There are 2 variants of the

> Cosmological Principle (ACP). The weak ACP states that we can state

of life

> certain things about the universe because it permits the existence

> and intelligent life (us).

[Jack starts here]

Yes, this WAP is strongly in the running now because of the hyperspace

physics

e.g.

[Image]

M Kaku's "Hyperspace"

There are literally many 3-dim material universes forming the

"ensemble" for

WAP.

Note, this is all classical - nothing to do yet with David Deutsch's

quantum

multiverse until you introduce Bohm's ontology. Kaku's Hyperspace in

the

picture is all Bohm's "hidden variable" or "system point", what Stapp

calls

"the Bohm point" missing in Bohr's epistemology not allowing

continuous

particle paths. Here we have the "particle" upped to the level of

Super Cosmos

with a single Bohm point of incredible topological complexity moving

through

Wheeler's Super Space. See "Gravitation and Inertia" Wheeler &

Ciufolini

supplement to MTW "Gravitation" and also "Journey into Gravity and

Spacetime"

for prerequisites. I will be reviewing all this including detailed

look at

Initial Value Problem in GR, the conformal factor, the 3-vector

gravimagnetic

potential, York Time, are elliptic constraints really superluminal or

Retarded = Elliptic FTL + Far Field Radiation

that Van Flandern et-al, also Phipps, get confused on because it is

subtle and

confusing - the Sciama-Ellis paper that on a spacelike foliation the

charge NOW

there is FELT though not SEEN by the charge HERE-NOW i.e. you cannot

use

retarded (or advanced) Green's function 1/r(ret) in the spacelike

foliation,

you must use Coulomb instant 1/r. This also has to do with Bohm's

quantum

potential Q - rule it must be instant relative to the foliation.

Lorentz

symmetry only local not global. But also a foliation involves topology

change

yes or no? CTC's time travel to the past yes or no? Global

hyperbolicity yes or

no? Positive stress energy densities yes or no? All this in detail

soon in PDF.

Meantime

http://stardrive.org/Jack/Hyperspace%20Notes.PDF

Like Bell's theorem we have lots of options the set of which are

mutually

incompatible. For example: Bell's theorem:

1. statistical subquantal equilibrium predictions of QM P = |psi|^2

2. locality

3. counter-factual definiteness

are mutually incompatible.

Note quantum nonlocality is consistent with no FTL communication and

no

cloning.

That is locality is sufficient to preclude FTL communication and

precognition,

but it is not necessary.

If you force 1 to be true, you must renounce either 2 or 3 or both!

You can

renounce both!

PQM renounces all three!

Similarly in classical GR:

I Topology of 3-dim space changes

II Global hyperbolic manifold

III Locality - chronology protection - no time travel to past

IV Positive stress-energy density

are mutually incompatible. Minimal mutually consistent set of

conditions is

I & II & not III & not IV

The idea of Einstein's Vision behind GR is the Riemann "back-action"

principle

of no action without direct reaction.

GR is only for "rock-like things".

In SR (globally flat 4-dim space-time):

Geometry acts on matter, matter gets its marching orders from

space-time, but

matter does not react back on space-time.

In orthodox QM in the Bohm causal limit:

The thoughtlike qubit pilot wave acts on matter (the hidden variable),

matter

gets its marching orders from the thought-like pilot wave, but matter

does not

react back on the thought-like pilot wave.

This assumes a coherent pilot wave on the relevant scale of

observation, e.g. a

superfluid for macro phenomena for the movement of matter by thought.

Only then will you get 1 above in Bell's theorem, i.e. only then will

you get

subquantal heat death with P = |psi|^2 e.g. p. 30 The Undivided

Universe & Ch

14

The analogy is obvious.

No rock-like gravity without rock-like matter directly reacting back

on

rock-like space-time.

No thought-like inner consciousness without rock-like matter directly

reacting

back on thoughtlike qubit pilot field.

The rocklike system point and the thoughtlike landscape in two-way

relation is

PQM.

--

CREATE, COMMUNICATE, COLLABORATE

http://stardrive.org