Culmea culmilor! Doi angajati PeTA au fost arestati pentru cruzime
impotriva animalelor. Se pare ca Peta de cativa ani buni strange caini
si pisici spunand ca le vor gasi o casa, dar marii majoritati din
aceste animale nu li s-a gasit nici o casa, fiind "eutanasiate". Acest
caz este o lovitura grea pt cei care lupta pt. drepturile animalelor.
Peta este foarte controvesata si pentru modul cum duce unele campanii
care socheaza opinia publica...
-------- Original Message --------
|Subject:||NOTMILK - Deception at PETA|
|From:||Robert Cohen <notmilk@...>|
Deception at PETA
"If caught or killed the Secretary will disavow any
knowledge of your existence."
Mission Impossible Instructions For Loyal Employees
Ingrid Newkirk has a history of deception. As a matter
of fact, one of my favorite books is her "Free The Animals,"
the story of Ingrid's path to founding PETA. In her
introduction, Ingrid explains that she is writing about
an individual other than herself. A third party. She has
continually denied that she is her own book's protagonist.
All I can say is "cow chips." Ingrid should take pride in
her past adventures and achievements in which she rescued
abused animals and exposed the horrors of animal research
labs by stealing "insider" videotapes which documented
Still, Ingrid is a liar. A liar by any other name is not
a rose. It's a liar, and what she's done this past week
is to pass the blame for PETA's unethical animal abuse
onto innocent worker bees who were just following orders.
In the cult of the PETA worker, I wonder why these
easily impressionable and underpaid children don't
just take cyanide capsules when caught. That way,
Ingrid's not-so-clean butt would not be exposed.
Hey, Ingrid. You're hanging those employees of yours out in
the swirling wind of a tornado to dry. Apparently, the buck
does not stop at your desk. How pathetic of Ingrid Newkirk
to blame PETA's horror story on two kids. Produce your past
incineration bills, Ingrid. PETA has been killing thousands
of animals each week for many years. How dare they lay the
blame on loyal employees who just follow orders?
Does it matter what happens to dead bodies? Buried at
sea, or burned to ashes, or placed into a dumpster, what
really is the crime? Murder is murder. The manner in which
bodies are disposed of does not worsen or lessen the crime.
Ingrid's latest smokescreen does not hide her victimless
policy of killing healthy animals.
"We would never do that," explained Ingrid. Do what? Kill
innocent creatures, as you have done? "We do not condone
dumping bodies in dumpsters." Give me a break.
What PETA should be doing.
PETA should address the problem, not their "ultimate solution."
The problem is "unwanted pets." The problem is people not
taking responsibility for animals. Neutering helps to prevent
unwanted animals. Does not PETA have the resources to open
a dog and cat shelter in upstate New York, just as Gene
and Lori Bauston once did in opening Farm Sanctuary? One
cannot rescue every unwanted dog or cat, just as one cannot
rescue the 10 billion farm animals killed each year to feed
Americans. In a sense, rescued animals living at sanctuaries
become ambassadors for billions of abused animals.
PETA should place their enormous resources and funds to open
such a shelter.
By euthanizing animals, PETA buries the secret of those
shelters who mass-kill their unwanted dogs and cats. These
creatures die horrible deaths. PETA rationalizes that their
euthanization program delivers compassionate slaughter to
animals that would otherwise be mass-murdered.
Know what? I prefer the uncompassionate mass-murder scenario
combined with public outrage. PETA has those horrible films
as a result of past undercover operations. They should use
some of their dollars to advertise this abuse. All people
should view the horrible truth of what really happens to
unwanted pets. Only then can the system be changed. On their
present course, PETA will succeed in doing nothing in that
regard. In this way PETA keeps these truths from the public
by quietly euthanizing sentient creatures.
There has never been any more offensive a concept as
compassionate murder. Compassionate slaughter is an insult
to those pretending to have compassion.
Note: For the first time that I've been writing columns,
more than ten percent of my readers felt the need and
passion to respond to Saturday's column. See:
In her press conference, Ingrid Newkirk, the mistress of
"Now let me explain why PETA believes euthanasia is the
kindest gift to a dog or cat unwanted and unloved."
Kindest gift? How about love? Rescue? Adoption?
Death is a kind gift? There are many unloved humans.
Should death be their kindest gift too? Ingrid, you've
grown dangerous, and the animal rights movement is
not being taken seriously by those who we criticize
for their abuse of animals. The per capita consumption
of chickens and cattle continues to increase, despite
your efforts. It is time for self examination. Death
in any form is not a kind gift. Despite your delusions,
you are not the angel of mercy to these creatures.
You have become the angel of death. What greater irony
is there that you continue to solicit funds from
people who believe that you are there to help these
animals needing love?
More than 500 letters received regarding my last column,
but all were not supportive of my position. Two of the
letter writers were quite upset with me for exposing PETA
for their crime against animals. For the others: Thank you
for understanding that death is the infinite cruelty.