In another Forum one Georgy Thomas has presented a series of reasons as to why we (JSC) are not true legatees of the Trikkunnathu seminary.
I do not usually wish to respond to postings in other forums, but
when I see a person gifted with good language skill and reasoning
ability, twist tales and distort facts I feel compelled to respond. I do not wish to repeat the reasons why we are the true heirs of the
Seminary and its heritage, it is well known to all members of our
Forum. I will restrict myself to pointing out what I see as
inconsistencies and cases of bad logic.
He proceeds in true analytical fashion and takes the case of the 4
Fathers entombed there. His arguments make rather interesting reading
1. H.G. Poulose Mor Athanasius (Kadavil)
He admits that people today say that Kadavil thirumeni was a staunch
supporter of the Syriac Church and would have remained a loyalist of
the Patriarch. His argument is the funny part. He says so was
Wattasseril Metran initially but later he opposed the Syriac Church
and so would Kadavil Thirumeni. This in my opinion is as ridiculous as saying that A was a good man until he died, B was also a good man
initially, later on B turned bad and by extension A would have also
turned bad had he been alive.
Poor application of deductive logic
2. H.G Gewargis Mor Gregorius (Vayaliparampil)
The author is very skillful here with his usage of references to
earlier postings. He quotes two postings that refer to mysterious
facts about the demise of two of our earlier Metropolitans. He
conveniently takes what he wants and leaves out the rest. The other
forum posting By Dr George K John he refers to (ICON 10684
) is very
critical of his own church (IOC). Just a few lines above what he has
quoted the author has said
"one of the core reasons for factional fight is the total negligence
and subordination of North Kerala parishes. the old and huge Angamaly
diocese was totally neglected rather appeared to be capturing it with
its holy centre,Thrikkunnathu seminary."
Georgy uses what is convenient to him from an earlier posting to prove a point that is denounced in that very posting. :D
The same happens in the case of his second reference (SOCM 6822
) by Bibu Philip Matthew. For the benefit of those who do not have the time to look up Bibu's posting, he clearly states that Trikkunnath Seminary belongs to the Jacobites.
Georgy again conveniently takes that which he needs leaving out the
rest. Maybe this is why he even omitted the URLs to the source postings
3. H.G Philipose Mor Theophilos (IOC)
Of course we make no claims to this legacy, Mor Theophilos was and
remains a former IOC metropolitan. Earlier postings in this forum have revealed how this thirumeni was buried there and the intentions behind this act. Also the earlier Kabar muri was enlarged to enclose Mor Theophilos's tomb. I am no one to judge his actions and God above is the final judge, but it is little odd that a Metropolitan who headed a united diocese for almost a decade (1966 onwards) has a miniscule number of churches and the erstwhile headquarters of the JSC diocese of Angamali as remnants. And his trusted lieutenant Mannaraprayil Corepiscopa has already revealed the truth after all these years.
Georgy's question as to whether they should walk away from this tomb,
reveals the true intentions behind all this. Bury a Metropolitan and
stake a claim in the future. If they were truly concerned about the
tomb, they would have buried Mor Theophilos in Kottayam itself.
4. St Poulose Mor Athanasius (Valia Thirumeni)
When he gets to speaking about Valia Thirumeni, he appears to have
nothing to say except launch a tirade against Mor Elias Julius of
blessed memory. Atleast he certifies that Valia Thirumeni lead a holy
In short he claims that we are not the legatees of the Trikkunath
>> one Metropolitan entered eternal rest before the schism and would
have sided with his faction (IOC) in all likelihood :))))
>> one Metropolitan died a supposedly mysterious death at the hands of Jacobite extremists and so IOC faithful who had nothing to do with it are the legatees.
>> one Metropolitan who occupied it against wishes of majority in his
Diocese was buried there and finally
>> atleast in the case of the fourth Metropolitan he admits no legacy.
The tone and tenor of his posting not withstanding, the poor
application of logic in his arguments weakens his conclusions.
Defeating his endeavour even before he started. About his language ,
the less said the better. He calls the faithful of our church who are
willing to shed their tears, blood and sweat for the church "Islamic
terrorist inspired Antiochian-movement". It is not that we can not
respond in kind to this sort of name calling, but that would only
bring us down to his level.
Finally as a parting note, isn't it unfortunate that you have to use
these tricks to try and prove a point ( that IOC are true legatees of
Trikkunnath seminary and the tombs of out holy fathers) that looks
stupid to say the least given the 'amount' of supposed 'respect' and
'honor' you show towards these holy fathers. Do you have any instance
of IOC meaningfully celebrating the anniversaries of Mor Gregorius
Vayaliparampil or St Mor Athanasius Poulose. Even the IOC Catholicose
designate was conducting his upavasam at the tomb of Mor Theophilos of IOC (according to media reports). Strange behavior considering that it is the death anniversary of St Mor Athanasius Poulose Valia Thirumeni.
Thank you all for your patient reading.
Prayers and Regards
Member ID 1011