422Re: [SOCM-FORUM] Deception
- Feb 25, 2002I have a copy of the SC order. I do not know if it is authentic. The name of the church it reads, "Marthoma Syria Church". I asked if this version is correct in the form but none responded. So I take the version as appeared in Manorama. It says, "V, If the Malankara association when convened, decides by majority that Moran Mar Baselius Marthoma Mathews II is not the Malankara Methran third respondent will voluntarily resign his office as Malankara Methran."What I understood from this sentence is that the Supreme Court is not serious nor object whether or not the Catholica uses the designation he so far held. It also means that the court admits the fact that until decided otherwise he is legitimately Malankara Methran.Again the order says Moran Mor Baselius Marthoma Mathews II shall call the meeting. But nowhere I found a directive not to use the 'MM' title. In the absence of clear directive not to use such designation I find nothing contrary to the SC order if he uses the 'MM' title.I will be happy to receive the version prohibiting the impugned title. Fr John KK.----- Original Message -----From: V ThomasSent: Monday, February 25, 2002 12:32 AMTo: SOCM-FORUM@yahoogroups.comSubject: Re: [SOCM-FORUM] DeceptionDear Achen,How you can see mistake with our niyutha bava only!Have you neet seen catholicas lenten msg in which he callshimself as Malanakara metropolitan and at the same time calls forassociation to elect "' Malankara Metropolitan".We have agreed for association to be conducted as per supreme courtdirection and earlier verdicts,not unilateral......
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>