Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: Digest Number 141

Expand Messages
  • Ron Matviyak
    Beverly, Thanks for the comments. It is good to know that results can be thin and hard to find, and then the description of your methods - usng both general
    Message 1 of 2 , Dec 22, 1999
    • 0 Attachment

      Thanks for the comments. It is good to know that results can be thin
      and hard to find, and then the description of your methods - usng both
      general and specific search - is handy. I'll have to give it a try, and
      probably will do as Maura does - check it once a year, as their data
      bases do not seem to coincide with my familie's activities.

      If I end up pleasantly surprised, with some results in hand, I will let
      you know!


      Mike & Bev wrote:
      > From: "Mike & Bev" <sekey@...>
      > I have a membership to Ancestry.com and have found very little useful info.
      > However, I find the best way to get the most results is to put in the
      > surname only. This way you get more hits and can then narrow it down to
      > your location as the data bases are grouped by geographical location. For
      > example, I am researching the name SEKEY. I type in that only and get a
      > number of hits. I then go to the index for Wisconsin census data as I
      > believe this is where they would be located to see if I can find the given
      > names I am looking for. This name is uncommon and doesn't produce many
      > results. If I look for ENGLE, I get more results than I can wade through so
      > I go back and narrow it down with a given name and/or location. To me, this
      > is the easiest way to view their data bases. In addition to doing my
      > original search, I go to advanced search and do the same thing as this
      > provides different data bases than the original search (at least from what I
      > have seen). I also do the "new data bases" search as it seems they are
      > seperated from the rest of the data bases. I have no idea why they make it
      > seem so complicated, but that is the way it seems to me. I would think you
      > could use one search engine to search and view all data bases at once. Good
      > luck to everyone. I hope someone can find something worthwhile.
      > Beverly
      > > Subject: Beginners at Ancestry site free for 2 weeks!
      > >
      > > Maura,
      > >
      > > This is a busy holiday season, but perhaps you or some other subscribers
      > > can give a few pointers on what and how to search on the Ancetry (and
      > > any) web. I called it up and all I can think to do is look for familiar
      > > names in the geographic area and time frame that I know they were
      > > there. So far I would say Iam without luck - but I can't determine if
      > > it is due to lack of my ancestors being on these data bases or me
      > > searching the wrong one or searching it in the wrong way.
      > >
      > > So I am searching by
      > >
      > > name, variation of name
      > > time
      > > geographic location
      > >
      > > Any other hints - other than re-read the FAQ and get some experience?
      > >
      > > Merry Christmas to All, in case I don't write again before the Holiday!
      > >
      > > Ron
      > >
      > > PS I had no trouble accessing some selected 'free' data bases the first
      > > night, and after signing on it appears to all be free...
      > >
      > >
      > > Message: 17
      > > Date: Tue, 21 Dec 1999 20:46:39 -0600 (CST)
      > > From: sabinov@... (Maura Petzolt)
      > > Subject: Re: Using Ancestry
      > >
      > > Ron and all,
      > >
      > > the thing you have to remember is that the databases at Ancestry are
      > > rather "hit and miss" in terms of what they have, and will only be
      > > useful to you if they have something in an area you are searching.
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.