Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: 1900/1910/1920 U.S. Censuses versus 1930 U.S. Census

Expand Messages
  • frankly1us
    Some time back, spent a year at a regional National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) center researching surnames from the 1900/1910/1920 U.S. Census
    Message 1 of 1 , Mar 29, 2002
    • 0 Attachment
      Some time back, spent a year at a regional National Archives and
      Records Administration (NARA) center researching surnames from the
      1900/1910/1920 U.S. Census enumeration microfilms.
      These U.S. Censuses used Miracode/Soundex Code and if one knew
      general area of surname residence (city or town) one could generally
      locate surname records.

      Caveat:

      Surname ommission rate in 1910 Miracode/Soundex was greater than in
      other 10 year census indexes.
      In many cases, individuals not indexed are still present in the
      census schedules, so it is especially advisable for researchers to
      continue a search in the actual schedules even though a surname fails
      to show up in an index.

      The only additional problem was when a individual census taker had
      such bad handwriting that pages of his census enumerations couldn't
      be read or deciphered.
      Each time I entered a new district enumeration hoped that the census
      taker's handwriting was legible.

      The 1930 U.S. Census consists of 2,667 rolls of population schedules and 1,587 rolls of Soundex indexes for 12 southern states, totaling 4,254 rolls.
      The other states, however, do not have Soundex indexes !

      So, for those States, surname researchers must now rely on 1930 city
      and other directories when available to locate their surnames ?
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.