31091Re: [S-R] Re: crossed out marriage record
- Dec 3, 2011I bet it was very juicy! Well they were both widower/widow. Normally those
kind of pairings are to look after children or for companionship. The 45 yr
old Zuber may of gotten a better offer ;) or maybe the lady didn't want to
look after Zuber's children and she got a better offer! One way to find out
is to trace them both and see what happened.
I've certainly found some great gossipy/juicy stuff way back in my line!
Good enough for at least a lunchtime soap series :)
Harking back to the emails, There is not that much difference between Zuber
and Huber in its written form so I wouldn't be too surprised if this
happened some time ago.
On 4 December 2011 02:18, deeellessbee <deeellessbee@...> wrote:
> Ah, interesting. I was hoping for something a bit juicier, lol, - or at
> least a little more detail - but I guess that's that! Google translate kept
> throwing in the word "lie" no matter how I spelled or rearranged the
> spacing of the letters, so I was expecting something more gossipy!
> Thanks so much,
> --- In SLOVAK-ROOTS@yahoogroups.com, htcstech <htcstech@...> wrote:
> > Sorry - not illegal but 'the record is therefore meaningless'.
> > On 3 December 2011 18:36, htcstech <htcstech@...> wrote:
> > > The note says "I wrote the entry before the marriage, then the couple
> > > withdrew, therefore illegal"
> > > They backed out of the marriage. :)
> > > Peter
> > >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>