Re: [SCA-Milliners] cap of maintenance restrictions and other heed covering queries...
- I know this is somewhat old, but I'm just catching up on all my messages.
The cap of mainenance is reserved per laurel ruling.
http://www.sca.org/heraldry/laurel/lessons/lesson16.html Near the bottom it
clearly states "A pelican in her piety and the cap of maintenance may only
be borne by Masters and Mistresses of the pelican."
This would technically make it a society wide restriction, but there are
several other such rulings that are customarily ignored. (The actual ruling
on the knight's chain vs what is practiced in many older kingdoms, including
mine.) Check with your locals to see what they have to say...if they aren't
sure, check your local kingdom site & see if there is a minister of protocol
listed. They should be able to give you definitave answers.
Starleaf Gate, Middle.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stephanie Reiley" <miladyblade@...>
Sent: Friday, December 29, 2006 8:30 AM
Subject: Re: [SCA-Milliners] cap of maintenance restrictions and other heed
>I don't see anything in the governing documents reserving the Cap of
> Maintenance as belonging solely to the Order of the Pelican.
> (Someone please correct me if I missed it.) However, the Cap of
> Maintenance /is/ a traditional symbol of that order and part of the
> elevation ceremony in several of the kingdoms. In addition, you may
> want to check your kingdom's sumptuary traditions/guidelines
> regarding the wearing of ermine.
> My two cents, is that you'd probably be fine wearing that style of
> hat. However, I'd steer clear of the blood red/ermine-lined
> combination that's commonly used in SCA elevation ceremonies. (And,
> yes, Rashid, I'm with you that historical caps of maintenance didn't
> necessarily look anything like that.)
> Dame Selene, OP (Atenveldt)
- Well, as one of the Pelicans on this list, I can tell you that most
people wouldn't want to wear a Cap of Maintenance in it's typically-
executed SCA form, anyway. :)
Dame Selene (Atenveldt)
On Apr 3, 2007, at 8:16 AM, Rebecca Klingbeil wrote:
> In other words, we can't wear something (unless we are
> pelicans) that no one is sure what it is and therefore
> who would know?
> Leofwynn Shaking-Her-Head-at-the-Silliness-of-It
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]