Re: Cross-posted: New Norse Clothing Research
- View Source
> I dunno about wearing those big honkin` pinsThe reconstructions suggested by this archaeologist
> THERE...looks kinda uncomfortable!
> But since WHEN was fashion mindful of comfort?
puts the expensive decorations in the small of the
That doesn't make sense from any fashion perspective,
or even a logical one. ;)
All the other second-hand research that I have seen,
says that the Norse would tend to decorate from the
waist up in the front, for the maximum effect. Check
out the Viking Answer Lady or Thora Sharptooth's
pages, and check back through their sources for a more
useful picture for yourself.
And the brooches were not immediately on the breasts,
Ann in CT
Looking for last minute shopping deals?
Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping
- View Source--- In SCA-Garb@yahoogroups.com, Ann Catelli <elvestoorder@...> wrote:
> The reconstructions suggested by this archaeologistOh... How soon we forget. I've got several bias cut dresses from the
> puts the expensive decorations in the small of the
> back only.
> That doesn't make sense from any fashion perspective,
> or even a logical one. ;)
1930's that were worn by an elderly friend in her youth, all
perfectly plain in the front, the only decoration being a big
glittery dress clip right at the center of the deep V of the back
neckline. Puts the ornament right in the small of the back.
And those bustles of the mid 1880's. There were lots of perfectly
plain dresses except for big, elaborately draped poufs on the butt.
The emphasis of fashion tends to shift around a woman's body, and not
in any sort of logical order so I wouldn't judge the lady's theory on
Does make me wonder if the brooches were worn at a standard level or
followed the course of gravity as a woman aged...