Re: re: Crossbow Questions
Thank you for the clearification and information. It is extrememly important
for us to be specific to what we term period or not .
ie- guns are period. AK-47s are not! ...This is obvious but what type of
"gun" and what defines it in a specfic period is what we must look at and
Again, thanks for the information and clearification.
I have a question for you- a full sized crossbow with a rifle shoulder stock
and a pistol grip and trigger release (as opposed to a "tickler and roller")
would not be period in Europe 1000-1500?
your information and attention to period detail is always a help and I learn
Thanks. I hope someday we can meet face to face. I will be honoured.
> I have a question for you- a full sized crossbow with a rifle shoulder stockTo the best of my knowlege (and I am a Laurel for (mainly) Crossbow building)
> and a pistol grip and trigger release (as opposed to a "tickler and roller")
> would not be period in Europe 1000-1500?
the answer is no. There are instances of bows with set and match triggers and
rudimentary rifle shoulder stocks in the 1700s, but none that I can document
have a pistol grip as well. There are Pistol grip bows in the 1800s but none
with carbine type rifle stocks.
There is a Belgian bow with a rifle stock, a trigger with a guard, and what
looks vaguely like a pistol grip, but it is not. It is a grip for your other
hand, and it is several inches in front of the trigger guard assembly. This
bow can be dated to the mid- to late- 1600s.
But there is no documentation that I can find for a modern assault carbine /
sten style bow in period.
Hope this helps