Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: [SCA-Archery] Re: Nottingham target?

Expand Messages
  • Taslen
    Randal and Jon, I definitely agree being able to work the bugs out in advance is going to make it alot easier for the marshals running the events. Gaelen
    Message 1 of 5 , Apr 6, 2013
    • 0 Attachment
      Randal and Jon,

      I definitely agree being able to work the bugs out in advance is going to make it alot easier for the marshals running the events.

      Gaelen



      From: Rusty McMillan <randal_of_camusfearna@...>
      To: SCA-Archery@yahoogroups.com
      Sent: Saturday, April 6, 2013 12:32 PM
      Subject: [SCA-Archery] Re: Nottingham target?

       
      Jon,

      Sounds like a great idea! The rules of the shoot make it different enough from a RR or IKAC that using the period target face would make almost no difference in the outcome.

      By the way, discussing the fine points this far in advance of the vote is also a great idea!!!

      YIS, Randal

      --- In SCA-Archery@yahoogroups.com, John Edgerton <sirjon1@...> wrote:
      >
      > I would like opinions on changing the size of the Nottingham competition target.
      > It is currently a 2 inch peg. A 8 inch roundel. And a 24 inch outer circle. The
      > IKAC Period Division target has a 6cm (2.4") peg. A 24cm (9.4") roundel. And a
      > 60cm (23.6") outer circle. There already exist printed copies of the IKAC Period
      > target. And I was sent (I do not remember by whom.) a printable size-able color
      > PDF of it that should be able to be done at printing/Zerox shops with large
      > format printers. See attached sample ( I hope). This face could also be used for
      > other future competitions that would use a roundel of that size.
      >
      > Anyone that does not want to have it printed can still draw it by hand. The
      > wreath around it is optional.
      >
      > Does anyone see any problems with changing to the standard IKAC roundel target
      > dimensions?
      >
      > Jon
      >



    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.