- Sir Jon, I concur! This looks like a great deal of fun and a good challenge for many of us focused only on center targets. Also, a big Thank You for all yourMessage 1 of 61 , Apr 4, 2013View Source
I concur! This looks like a great deal of fun and a good challenge for many of us focused only on center targets.
Also, a big Thank You for all your work and dedication to this community!
I REALLY like this one! It is simple, straightforward, and yet challenging! And being set at 20 yards, it is perfect for indoor ranges, especially during the bad weather months!
[Attachment(s) from John Edgerton included below]
I am presenting the following competition for comment on inclusion in the SSAC.
Thank you for any comments. The drawing of the target is attached.
This competition seems to have begun in the Netherlands in the 1400’s. There is a period illustration showing part of a circular target where there are numerical values in arcs of the circle. And there is mention of square targets with a series of smaller squares of different values.
The target face is 20 inches on a side and the small squares are 4 inches square. There are twenty-five squares in total. The target is placed with one corner pointing upward, as per the drawing below. The numbers are placed as shown in the drawing and should be large enough to be read at twenty yards.
The distance is twenty yards. Youth division is ten yards.
The number of ends is two, each of six arrows.
The scoring is value of the box hit. Lines count as the higher score. A square may only be hit once for score. Repeated hits to the same square by the same archer to do not count for additional score. The maximum score per end is 135, for a maximum total of 270 points. The individual score sheets should provide space for each score in a vertical column for ease in totaling. There should be a total for each end and a grand total. Double-checking the scores with a calculator is advised.
Attachment(s) from John Edgerton
1 of 1 File(s)
- Iurii, To answer your question, yes the system is working properly you are currently ranked higher then the Archos, but then currently the system does not haveMessage 61 of 61 , Apr 30, 2013View SourceJonathasHey, be happy and brag about the accomplishment! YOU are ranked higher then the Archos!!! As I said to one of my local archers, "Right now you are the best handbow shooter in the entire SCA!!! Based on the current SSAC anyway." Which was a true statement, since she had submitted the only handbow score at that point. Enjoy it while it lasts!Iurii,To answer your question, yes the system is working properly you are currently ranked higher then the Archos, but then currently the system does not have the full picture.
Don't forget that right now the GAT is based on a *VERY* limited data set, that is only the SSACs and IKACs. If you shot all of these and the Archos in question only shot one of them, then yes in the GAT you would rank higher, as you have been more active in shooting. Now once you both have 5 shoots, if the Archos does better in those shoots then he will rank higher then you. Here in lies one of the BIG differences between the RR rankings that everyone is used to and the GAT. In the RR you do not have a rank (aka average) at all until you have 3 scores, with the GAT as soon as you have one score you have a rank although it is not all that it could be since it is truly based on 5 scores. This was choosen to encourage people to shoot more, yet not allow someone who enters absolutely everything yet does very poorly to come out on top. A decent active archer should enter at least 5 events a year, especially with the SSAC and IKAC filling in the gaps, and if they enter more events then only the best five are used.
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Chris Ivins <yuriilev@...> wrote:I'm a bit confused about the ranking order on the current list, according to it's system, I'm actually ranked higher than an Archos in my local area, and his scores are much higher than mine, by any comparison. Is this just because the system is getting ironed out, or am I missing something critical in the formula?- In Service,Lord Iurii Levchenich, Junior TAMDeputy to the Honorable Lady Johanna Trewpeny, Adiantum Archery MarshalArcuarius to Gawin of Kevelioc