Re: [SCA-Archery] Re: Horse bow question
- On 07/08/2012, John Edgerton <sirjon1@...> wrote:
> I think that "Horsebows", one word, is the brand name for Lajos bows.A problem that often occurs within the SCA, is that some people set
> Horse bows like short bows or long bows is a general class of bows.
> From: Luigi Kapaj <puppy@...>
> To: SCA-Archery@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Mon, August 6, 2012 4:48:24 PM
> Subject: [SCA-Archery] Re: Horse bow question
> "Horse Bow" is a brand name, not a type of bow. Those bows are made by the
> master horse archer and teacher Kassai Lajos. They are fiberglass bows made
> in the shape of period styles and worth the money. (I own two) There are
> others who make Asian style bows, and you'll notice that the other two
> mentioned in the same price range are also made of fiberglass. BTW - I have
> seen one of the Korean bows in action, it was sweet.
> If you are concerned with period bows made of horn and sinew from Asia like
> the ones used by Mongolians, then you should discuss Composite Bows.
> Depending on source, The prices range from $850 (the ones I import from
> Mongolia) to the $2000-$3000 you will pay for the masterpieces of the likes
> of Jaap of Yumi Bows. (I don't own one... yet) You will be hard pressed to
> find one cheaper as to properly make one of these it takes at least 1 to 2
> I can see how this would price most people out of a period bow competition,
> but we already allow period-like bows of modern materials in all SCA
> archery, so a period bow only sub category is pointless if you allow
> fiberglass bows.
> PS - The Japanese "Yumi" bow is an asymmetrical longbow that is not of horn
> and sinew construction. Not sure how it got lumped into this discussion
> other than that it is sometimes used on horseback, but then so has any
> type of bow for that matter. An asymmetric bow only sub category, now that
> would be interesting. It may be Huns vs Japanese only though...
themselves up as self professed experts ("an expert is a drip under
pressure" :) ), and absolute authorities, on subjects of their choice.
Horsebows and horse bows are the same in meaning - they are bows
designed to be used on horses, nothing more and nothing less.
I am sure that people who have had horsebows throughout history, would
either laugh at, or get somewhat angry at (or, possibly, simply
ignore), comments like "the term horsebows is a brand name.
I doubt that his maker of Hungarian horsebows, being only one type of
horsebows, has trademarked the term "horsebows".
I somehow think that Genghis Khan and his people, would not be amused,
by some upstart in the twenty-first century, telling them that they
were not using horsebows, and that horsebows were not invented until
someone in Hungary, in the late twentieth century, started making what
that person names horsebows.
I do not know whether the message from that puppy above, is a troll,
but it certainly appears to be a troll.
Oblio the Unregistered,
Heretic of Abertwidr
of the Western Shores
In the Kingdom of Lochac
Per fructu, non folii
"Obsequium parit amicos; veritas parit odium"
- Marcus Tullius Cicero (106BCE -43BCE)
"There is no religion higher than truth"
- Helena Petrovna Blavatsky (1831CE - 1891CE)
- Gentlemen & Ladies,
>One of my crossbow customers just contacted me with a question I
can't properly answer. He is building a crossbow and wants to know
the minimum weight bolt he should use. He didn't specify a draw
weight. No doubt this will vary depending on the prod composition,
mass, and draw weight. I was wondering if there is such a formula,
and if so where I might find it.
>Jim Koch "Gladius The Alchemist"