Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: more ?? lol

Expand Messages
  • russell
    great info thxs
    Message 1 of 3 , Aug 8 7:49 PM
    • 0 Attachment
      great info thxs








      --- In SCA-Archery@yahoogroups.com, Carolus <eulenhorst@...> wrote:
      >
      > A full working recurve is the most efficient design, the horsebow is a
      > version of this and generally qualifies as a shortbow. Long bows and
      > flatbows are different constructions of thee same design though all
      > recurves are technically flatbows. Shortbows can exist in either design
      > and are not technically a class unto themselves. If a bow fails it
      > doesn't matter what type it is - the potential for injury is the same.
      > Some materials fail giving more jagged edges than others so material is
      > more important than design.
      > Carolus
      >
      > russell wrote:
      > > How would you rate for accuracy and performanece cast etc in order.
      > > Horsebow
      > > Recurve
      > > Longbow
      > > shortbow
      > > Flatbow
      > > same # and draw
      > > I saw Horsebow in action. very effctive stored power/cast smooth
      > > seems longbow needs more # to get same result and recurve is very good bow design.
      > > I like the actions of horsebow and recurve over longbow.
      > > But yes I know diff designs so maybe cant compair apples and oranges.
      > > if all bows same #
      > > I am use to recurve so I might be bias against longbow
      > > thats why I am asking.
      > > so same archer using all bow designs
      > > how do you rate them??
      > > Also is one design safewr than another. Something I was thinking about if a bow blowsup. Is one more damamging than other? sounds odd to say but its a question.
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > > ------------------------------------
      > >
      > >
      > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
      > >
      > >
      > > No virus found in this incoming message.
      > > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
      > > Version: 9.0.851 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3057 - Release Date: 08/07/10 11:12:00
      > >
      > >
      >
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.