Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.
 

RE: [SCA-Archery] Re: (no subject)

Expand Messages
  • Rj Bachner
    It is a fun diversion on an otherwise quiet list I think. I know it does not belong here technically but life is seldom perfect ragi ... From:
    Message 1 of 3 , Nov 17, 2006
      It is a fun diversion on an otherwise quiet list I think. I know it does not
      belong here technically but life is seldom perfect

      ragi

      -----Original Message-----
      From: SCA-Archery@yahoogroups.com [mailto:SCA-Archery@yahoogroups.com] On
      Behalf Of ice tiger
      Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 12:44 PM
      To: SCA-Archery@yahoogroups.com
      Subject: Re: [SCA-Archery] Re: (no subject)

      Not to put too fine a point on it but what the hell does this discussion
      have to do with SCA archery? Quite frankly it's taking up space for no
      purpose.
      Dalton

      ----- Original Message -----
      From: "James W. Pratt, Jr." <cunning@...>
      Date: Friday, November 17, 2006 7:22 am
      Subject: Re: [SCA-Archery] Re: (no subject)

      > It the arrows had a spine to match the peak weight of the compound
      > it would be much safer than spined to the holding weight!
      >
      > Lets see.... 75% let off.... 25lb holding weight ....100 spined
      > arrows.
      > James Cunningham
      >
      >
      > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
      >
      >


      --
      [Email to SCA-Archery-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com to leave this list]

      Yahoo! Groups Links
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.