Your completely correct good sir , I had not slept for over twenty hours
and I shall blame my math and thinking the IKAC only had 6 rounds on that.
While the scores did look much better with my math;-) They are still
incredible and I would still love to pick up some pointers from them.
> Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 07:40:22 -0400
> From: drosen105@...
>Subject: Re: Wow!!!Does anyone have video??
>I'm not sure how you figured that. The Ikac is 12 rounds. At six arrows
>per round, if they were all gold, would be 360. The highest score is
>around 320. By the way, 6 of those rounds are timed ends. I don't know
>where you come from, but here in the east, we generally shoot more than
>six arrows in 30 seconds.
>Rupert the Unbalanced (of the East)
> > I was just looking at the Ikac scores for this year. Does any one have any
> > video of the archers from the East, I would love to study their technique.
> > I just did the math that at a min their scores would have to be 60 bulls
> > eyes in a row with an average of 14+ shots per speed round!!! And that is
> > the average not the high score. My god I would love to meet
> > these archers
> > not to mention take lessons.
> Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 09:09:15 -0400
> From: "L.J. Sparvero" <lyev@...>
>Subject: Re: Making crossbow bolts
>At 02:30 PM 10/22/2002 +0000, Macsen wrote:
> >The grain is the first thing I'd check. It should be at right angles to the
> From splitting more firewood that I care to recall, it seemed like an
>axe-stroke at right angles to the grain caused the log to split neatly. I
>never tried to split it parallel to the grain to see if it was easier, so I
>really don't know.
>What I do know from bare-shaft tuning of my period recurve is that the
>spine of the shaft is slightly different (about 3 pounds on a 32" 45-50#
>shaft) if it's measured parallel or at right angles to the grain.
>But yes, if the spine weight is strong enough for a given bolt length, this
>isn't an issue.
> >Another thing to look at is diameter. If the string is not lying along the
> >center of the bolt's butt, it can tend to jump over or under the bolt
> >causing a misfire. If it's off center, but not enough to misfire, it may
> >be applying force to a narrower section of the bolt increasing the
> >likelihood of bolt damage. (The number of servings on the string is a
> >factor here also as it effects how high the string sits on the shelf.)
>This is very good advice. Another thing I check is that my rolling-nut is
>seated properly in the stock -- if the nut is holding the string too high
>or low relative to the bolt, the same effect is going to happen.
> >Longer bolts tend to be more accurate but slower to load and vice
> >versa. Also, unless you use a spring to hold down your bolts, they'll
> >tend to tip off the end of the shelf if they're to long.
>And even with holding the bolt down with your thumb might not solve the
>issue if the bolt is too tip-heavy (been there, done that).
>I've noticed that the Philly museum bolts are tapered in the sides in back,
>seemingly to fit in the nut better (i.e. it looks like a flattened "O"
>rather than a perfectly round circle). Has anyone out there had a chance to
>look at an authentic bow with its original bolts? (the Philly and Cleveland
>bolts are not matched to the bows that they're displayed with IIRC) I
>always have wondered if the butt-end of the bolts are shaped to give a snug
>(but not tight!) fit in the nut, to help keep them from falling off the
>shelf. Several of the bows I've looked at don't have a groove in the stock
>to help hold the bolt.
> Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 09:43:23 -0400
> From: Jack Bradley <ragnar@...>
>Subject: Crossbow strings
>As long as we're on the crossbow subject Anyone have ides on strings I
>make mine the same as longbow or recurve strings 34 strands of B50 The
>only deference being I double serving the centre of the string
>Ragnar Two Ax
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/