7543Re: [SCA-Archery] Apples and Oranges?
- Nov 30, 2001In a message dated 11/30/01 6:40:33 AM Pacific Standard Time,
> Who was it who thought that Crossbow and Bow couldAha! Another pot that gets stirred, with interesting results. I,
> even be closely resembled in regards to competition
> and performance? And why hasn't it been changed? The
> ONLY thing they really have in common is wind
> factor... that I can see anyhow. It's like comparing a
> rifle and a pistol... sorta. Either way, it's apples
> and oranges.
personally, feel that a crossbow has an "unfair advantage" against a handbow,
in that the string is held by a mechanical device at full draw (no
possiblility of string creep) and the mechanical holding device allows for
much more consistent release. In AnTir, the target archery rules are written
such that a crossbow cannot compete against a handbow in any official
competition, but must compete only against other crossbows in its own class.
I am known as a handbow shooter, so I may be biased in this regard, but when
I feel the need to "answer the challenge" against crossbows, I simply
unlimber my Alistair period style crossbow and let fly. The results are
Andras Truemark, OGGS
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>