Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

26811Re: [SCA-Archery] GWW range marshals

Expand Messages
  • Jessica E Baas
    Sep 30, 2009
    • 0 Attachment
      I agree with Carolus.

      We only authorize separately for handbow and crossbow. While the individual handbows have differences, the basic form is the same, no reason to authorize by weight. We also wouldn't want to put that much in the RMs bag (you're safe to use a 35lb bow, but not a 40lb bow - seems like a lot of subjective judgement there!).

      Christina




      ________________________________
      From: Carolus <eulenhorst@...>
      To: SCA-Archery@yahoogroups.com
      Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 11:21:30 AM
      Subject: Re: [SCA-Archery] GWW range marshals


      I had the same thought. And what is the breaking point, I have 33,
      37,39, and 44 # bows. As a former kingdom archery officer, this just
      looks like a way to waste marshals' time and discourage archers.
      Carolus

      ICE TIGER wrote:
      > Each bow weight? Isn't that a bit excessive? I mean fine, a person might shake a bit with a heavier bow but unless it is really severe that doesn't constitute dangerous, just inaccurate. It just generates extra paperwork. Personally I don't really see the need for authorizations but then I shoot on mundane compound lines as well and there is no authorizations or demonstration of skill required so I guess I 'm just used to it that way.
      >
      >
      ----------

      No virus found in this outgoing message.
      Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
      Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.13.115/2403 - Release Date: 09/29/09 17:56:00

      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
    • Show all 28 messages in this topic