Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: [SACC-L] Re: Lapse memberships

Expand Messages
  • Rebecca Cramer
    I m badly lapsed y all.   Will be glad to pay up, back subscriber dues for the last 2 years or so, plus the next.   Just tell me where to send the check.
    Message 1 of 2 , Sep 17, 2011
    • 0 Attachment
      I'm badly lapsed y'all.   Will be glad to pay up, back subscriber dues for the last 2 years or so, plus the next.   Just tell me where to send the check.
      Beca

      ==============
      Rebecca Cramer
      missiontosonora@...
      http://rcramer.web.arizona.edu

      --- On Sat, 9/17/11, Lloyd Miller <lloyd.miller@...> wrote:


      From: Lloyd Miller <lloyd.miller@...>
      Subject: [SACC-L] Re: Lapse memberships
      To: "Melvin Johnson" <majohns1@...>
      Cc: "Ann Kaupp" <kauppa@...>, "Autumn Cahoon" <akcahoon@...>, bmuckle@..., "Dianne Chidester" <dianneky@...>, "George Rodgers" <grodgers@...>, "JoRaine Rodgers" <jo_rainie@...>, "Laura Gonzalez" <ltgonzalez@...>, "laura gravatt--NWU" <lgravatt@...>, maren.wilson@..., "Mark Lewine" <mlewine@...>, "Mary Kay Gilliland" <mkgilliland@...>, nicoleives@..., "Rebecca Stein-Frankle" <steinrl@...>, "SACC listserve" <sacc-l@yahoogroups.com>, "Tad McIlwraith" <tad@...>, "Tad Mcilwraitht" <mcilwraitht@...>, tsullivan@...
      Date: Saturday, September 17, 2011, 3:44 PM


      First, Mel, I want to reply to your earlier message. The Omaha conference was exceptional in every respect. You and Leatha did a fine job! I concur entirely with Dianne's passionate assessment on our website. While I understand that some could not make it due to money matters or other exigencies, those who chose not to attend because they knew little or nothing about the Omaha/Lincoln area and/or the Winnebago Tribe or thought simply that Omaha was "not cool" passed up an extraordinary opportunity.

      Now to the membership matter. I've said before that we seem to lack incentives to "join" (i.e., pay dues to) SACC as an added section to the basic AAA membership. Our website is first-class, provides all necessary information for SACC conferences and other matters and includes our biannual publication, all available to the public without charge.  Though the listserv requires joining through the administrator, it too is free to the public. We have been charging $275 conference registration for members and $300 for non-members (except students), but that difference equals the $25 we charge for SACC section membership. So aside from those of us "hard-core葉hrough thick and thin" members, why join?

      And I don't have an answer for this. I don't know that we would increase membership if we restricted access to members only. My guess is that so many of the community college anthropologists and those from other institutions who place importance on teaching undergraduates are either adjunct or are facing enough problems of basic survival that membership matters are way down on their lists of professional priorities.

      I'm confident that these matters will inspire lively and creative conversation in Montreal, and though I won't be there, I look forward to hearing about it all.

      Lloyd


      On Sep 17, 2011, at 10:19 AM, Melvin Johnson wrote:

      > According to the August treasurers report for SACC, we have 72 lapsed memberships.  This is problematic, as it reduces the amount of money we get in dues.  I think this needs to be addressed at our meetings in Montreal.

      > Melvin Johnson, PhD
      > President, SACC
      >
      > "Life is a banquet, and most poor suckers are starving to death." --Mame Dennis



      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



      ------------------------------------

      Find out more at our web site http://saccweb.net/ Yahoo! Groups Links





      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.