Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.
 

India: The baniya approach to disaster management - Nuclear Civil Liability Bill

Expand Messages
  • Harsh Kapoor
    South Asians Against Nukes - Year 12 19 March 2010 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SAAN_/message/1343 o o o Baniya and the bomb by Jawed Naqvi Dawn, 18 Mar, 2010
    Message 1 of 1 , Mar 18, 2010
      South Asians Against Nukes - Year 12
      19 March 2010

      http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SAAN_/message/1343

      o o o

      Baniya and the bomb

      by Jawed Naqvi
      Dawn, 18 Mar, 2010

      India's chief military scientist V.K. Saraswat speaks during a press
      conference in New Delhi, India. Saraswat says the country will test a
      new long-range nuclear-capable missile, the Agni-V with a range of
      5,000 kilometers, within a year. –AP Photo

      Nuclear outrage on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was carried out by a people
      whose hands were covered with the blood of countless black slaves,
      indigenous American tribes and with the internecine carnage of their
      own in what they called a civil war. Do Indians and Pakistanis have
      the stomach for a galling nuclear war?

      Given the bloodletting of Nadir Shah in Delhi and of Emperor Asoka in
      Kalinga (before he became Buddhist), not to speak of an almost daily
      outrage inflicted by rightwing Hindus and Muslim extremists on each
      other and on their own there is a tradition of violence in the region
      which, though it may not be of the same shall we say calibre,
      resembles the American streak for gory inhumanity.

      Z.A. Bhutto’s exhortation to his people to eat grass but make the bomb
      and screaming headlines, in the aftermath of the 1998 nuclear tests,
      quoting Indian leaders about how their country could wipe out Pakistan
      in a nuclear duel indicated a penchant for violent and destructive
      nationalism whose roots are more than skin-deep. Pacifists like Martin
      Luther King, Mahatma Gandhi and Abdul Ghaffar Khan have really no
      place in their own countries, such are the compulsions of the new
      nation-state to be battle-ready with bloodcurdling doctrines of mass
      annihilation.

      It comes as a surprise then that there is a debate raging in India
      about a bill the government wants to introduce in parliament to grant
      virtual immunity to foreign suppliers of civil nuclear power units.
      The debate centres on a few key issues but the primary objection
      raised by the opposition, including the left and the right of the
      spectrum, is that the monetary compensation in the event of a nuclear
      disaster caused by an act of terrorism, by a natural calamity or by an
      accident was 100 times less than the $10bn liability fixed in the US
      for a similar contingency. Opposition groups have another bone to
      pick: foreign suppliers have been assigned no liability even in doling
      out the meagre compensation.

      This is the baniya approach to disaster management. Financial
      accounting for an unaccounted number of lives at risk from a manmade
      disaster with loose or serious change on offer is heartless. In any
      case, I am not sure that there is as much as a penny kept as
      compensation for similar or worse consequence accruing (a
      balance-sheet term!) from an actual nuclear war that both countries
      have threatened each other with.

      In the eventuality of a war would there be any accountant or claimant
      left to follow up on the dole were it on offer? The irony is that the
      ghoulish debate about compensation is carried out by those who have
      never spared a thought for a nuclear calamity should a war occur.
      Parliaments on both sides are stacked with unrelenting nuclear hawks.

      It is not that nuclear accidents have not occurred in India but
      sometimes dealing with a non-nuclear accident has been a handful.
      Twenty-five years have passed since that night of terror and death in
      Bhopal, which saw a cloud of deadly gases explode out of a faulty tank
      in a pesticide factory and silently spread into the homes of sleeping
      people. Although no official count of casualties has ever been done,
      estimates based on hospital and rehabilitation records show that about
      20,000 people died and about half a million suffered bodily damage,
      making it by far the world’s worst industrial disaster ever.

      Many who breathed the highly toxic cocktail that night suffered a
      horrible death with multiple organ failure. Those who survived have
      suffered multiple diseases for 25 years. There too the focus has been
      on the quantity and spread of monetary compensation. But successive
      comprador governments have found little time to pursue the interests
      of Indians. Their leaders have been busy proclaiming the positive
      effects on India of colonial rule. Can any leader in India put in a
      side request for the extradition of Warren Anderson of the US? He was
      the chairman of Union Carbide, responsible for the Bhopal gas leak.

      It is hypocritical is it not that India’s opposition and its so many
      wise NGOs are talking about compensation for a nuclear accident! But
      when did anyone take out a joint opposition or a civil society rally
      against nuclear weapons in the land of Gandhi? Far from it; there is
      not even the remotest effort by anyone barring perhaps one or two
      small NGOs to educate the masses about what lies in store for them.

      Let’s pare down the issue to this: which is a likelier risk as a
      source of mass annihilation — a deliberate or accidental nuclear war
      or a Bhopal-like eventuality at a civil nuclear site?

      India flaunts itself as a nuclear power that purports to defend the
      interests of a billion plus citizens. Has it tried to do a fraction of
      the diligence that a country like the United States had to do to
      protect itself from a nuclear attack? Americans spent $45bn during the
      Cold War in preparing to absorb, though not thwart, a nuclear strike.
      And even here it was meant to protect its leaders and military
      capability, not the citizens.

      I remember reading a laughable emulation by the Indian authorities a
      few years ago, when they advised through newspaper ads that citizens
      should pack their windows and doors with impermeable sheets of plastic
      and tune in to the radio during a nuclear calamity. The advisory was
      unwittingly aimed at those Indians who owned a house in any of the
      cities, not for the millions who sleep under the sky come rain, winter
      or high summer.

      The 9/11 attack spurred the US government to partially carry out its
      mothballed nuclear contingency plan. However, the evacuations of
      federal government buildings and many private offices in New York,
      Washington DC, Chicago and elsewhere created massive traffic jams,
      bringing traffic in some areas to a standstill for hours.

      Wrote Stephen Schwartz author, and publisher of Bulletin of Atomic
      Scientists: “This demonstrated once and for all the utter unreality
      and futility of all civil defence plans devised by government
      officials, who from the 1950s through the 1980s promoted orderly
      citywide evacuations to the countryside as the best means against
      nuclear attack.”

      Moreover, observed Schwartz: “With so much attention, and money,
      devoted to safeguarding government leaders and so little to protecting
      the public, would there be anyone or anything left to govern in the
      event of a truly catastrophic large-scale attack upon the United
      States?” That is the point to ponder in India’s parliament.

      Book-keeping for the dead and survivors can be left to the myopic
      accountant, the heartless baniya.

      The writer is Dawn’s correspondent in Delhi.

      jawednaqvi@...


      ____________

      SOUTH ASIANS AGAINST NUKES (SAAN):
      An informal information platform for activists and scholars concerned
      about the dangers of Nuclearisation in South Asia
      http://s-asians-against-nukes.org/

      SAAN Mailing List:
      To subscribe send a blank message to: saan_-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
      ________________________________
      DISCLAIMER: Opinions expressed in materials carried in the posts do
      not necessarily reflect the views of SAAN compilers.
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.