Re: Charter revision proposal file upload- LONG
> The only thing I would like to see changed would be (Provost):Staffan brings up a good point. The KRM wants the number of Senior
> "Encouraged to authorize as a Senior Marshal."
> Since this is a Marshalite issue, may I suggest something in the
> effect of "Encouraged to be capable of authorizing as a Senior
> Marshal."? This will leave it within the capable hands of the Kingdom
> Rapier Marshal to designate who is a Senior Marshal.
Marshals limited, and therefore the Marshalate would end up controlling
the guild, whether they wanted to or not, and they would be under two
diametrically opposed forces; one to limit SMs and one to increase SMs.
Can I encourage folks to keep making suggestions with the concept that
they will probably not be included in this version of the charter?
This is not a question of cencorship or the merit of anyone's argument,
but more has to do with the time constraints on our LGM.
Let us support Sorcha as she approaches the Crowns of the West with our
first attempt at something this large, and then learn from that
experience, and gather our contributing ideas for the next round.
- On 6/3/05, crimsonkyl <crimsonkil@...> wrote:
> Not without merit, but we have already had two journeymen made onI don't think wanting time in grade is a useful solution to that.
> the spot, at the discretion of a Guildmaster. No prize was fought,
> no announcements beforehand, just "hey guys, guess what?"
Requiring prizes to be played as a condition of advancement, and
stating a minimum number of examiners will work better I think.
As does social pressure, if you can exert it :)
If those journeymen are useless then the Guild can show that to be so
and others will realise they aren't "real". If they aren't, but do
the job even if their elevation was unorthodox, then it's water under
The "Bellatrix's knighting" story comes to mind...