Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

My December Reading

Expand Messages
  • meah56
    On Strike for Christmas by Sheila Roberts That Holiday Feeling by D. Macomber, S. Woods, R. Carr Blue Christmas by Mary Kay Andrews It Happened One Night by
    Message 1 of 79 , Jan 1, 2010
      On Strike for Christmas by Sheila Roberts
      That Holiday Feeling by D. Macomber, S. Woods, R. Carr
      Blue Christmas by Mary Kay Andrews
      It Happened One Night by Lisa Dale
      A Stone Creek Christmas by Linda Lael Miller
      The Christmas Bus by Melody Carlson
      At Home in Stone Creek by Linda Lael Miller
      The Secret of Everything by Barbara O'Neal
      Truly, Madly by Heather Webber
      The Shadow of the Wind by Carlos Ruiz Zafon

      Lots of Christmas reading but a few others. A great reading month!
    • Bob Taylor
      Helen I quite agree, I feel that the man charged should have done more time. As should Andrew if there is any truth in the allegations, prince or not. Other
      Message 79 of 79 , Jan 25, 2015
        I quite agree, I feel that the man charged should have done more time. As should Andrew if there is any truth in the allegations, prince or not. Other than a photograph that shows only that the girl was in the same location, I haven’t seen anything to definitely show any contact between the two. I’ve seen accidents where every police officer at the scene has wound up having to fight lawsuits alleging that the accident was not properly investigated. A number of lawyers seem to feel that the best defence is a good offence, and once money enters into the equation anything can happen. We have one going on right now where a motorist plowed into three boys on bicycles, killing one and seriously injuring the other two. It happened at night, but the bicycles were properly equipped with reflectors, and the boys were wearing reflective clothing. The female driver is suing the two boys that survived and the parents of the dead boy for damages because of the trauma she has suffered because of their negligence. to me the thing that stinks in the whole deal is that she and her Police Officer husband in separate vehicles were driving home from a bar where they admit having several drinks, yet the police officers investigating the accident made no attempt to have her provide a breath sample, or even make a drivers statement.
        Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2015 6:01 PM
        Subject: Re: [RobynCarr_Chatgroup] Reading

        I'm sure you're correct about the wide net, but this is a very very bad man and convicted for his unspeakable acts. He would have served more than ten months if he hadn't had the money for such a high powered defense team. For Andrew to be photographed with the then 17 year old girl is very damning and surely worrisome to the monarchy at best. I hate it for him. He has always been one of my favorites of that family. I hope the girl's allegations aren't true.


        This email message and all attachments transmitted with it may contain legally privileged and confidential information intended solely for the use of the addressee. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reading, dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone at 404-582-8073 or by electronic mail, and delete this message and all copies and backups thereof. Thank you.

        On Jan 24, 2015, at 9:09 PM, 'Bob Taylor' bob193780@...<mailto:bob193780@...> [RobynCarr_Chatgroup] <RobynCarr_Chatgroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:RobynCarr_Chatgroup@yahoogroups.com>> wrote:


        I don’t know whether Andrew has done what they are alleging but he was unfortunate in being listed among the friends of the American who is supposed to have done everything. he probably isn’t the only one mentioned. From other law suits I know that when they are looking for money the lawyers will cast the net as wide as possible hoping that some will settle rather than invest the time and money in defending it so right now I’m kind of reserving judgment. It’s one thing to allege something but very different to prove it. trouble is in the media he has been tried and convicted.


        From: mailto:RobynCarr_Chatgroup@yahoogroups.com
        Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 12:52 PM
        To: RobynCarr_Chatgroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:RobynCarr_Chatgroup@yahoogroups.com>
        Subject: RE: [RobynCarr_Chatgroup] Reading

        How interesting, Bob! I suppose some of the British royalty really have their panties in a wad over Andrews [alleged] escapades!
        I wanted to read Love Story when I was in high school. My mother wouldn’t let me buy the paperback because she was afraid it had ‘sex’ in it. My grandmother had the paperback and told my mother it was fine and that she’d let me read her copy. My grandmother had taken a Sharpie and lined through all the curse words. There were TONS of them. But, to my chagrin, no sex (that I remember, anyway). It was very distracting for me to try to fill-in-the-blanks as I was reading, though.
        From: RobynCarr_Chatgroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:RobynCarr_Chatgroup@yahoogroups.com> [mailto:RobynCarr_Chatgroup@yahoogroups.com]
        Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 12:42 PM
        To: RobynCarr_Chatgroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:RobynCarr_Chatgroup@yahoogroups.com>
        Subject: Re: [RobynCarr_Chatgroup] Reading

        I never read the Caldwell book, but it reminds me of the furor there was in England over Lady Chatterley's Lover by D H Lawrence, he wrote it prior to WW2 but the book had been banned because of the sex scenes in it. Just after I got out of the Army in 59, a publisher decided to go ahead and publish it. We had to order the book, and Chris and I decided to get it to see what the fuss was about. It was delivered by mail, in a plain brown wrapper and was one of the most boring books I have ever read. To me any sexual part was very much secondary to the relationship between Lady Chatterley and the gamekeeper, and the book as a whole was more a scathing indictment of the mores of the so called upper classes of British society. That was something I was well aware of having served under several of the chinless idiots whose parents had purchased their sons commissions. You know how it worked, the heir looks after the estate, the spare goes into the military, and the spare spare goes into the Church.
        I still can’t see why the book was ever banned, but then that was Britain at the time. In the schools, boys and girls were separated at 7 or 8. The encyclopedias in schools and children's libraries had any references to sex removed. Literally clipped out of the pages. My High School like most had two ends, one for boys the other for girls, there were two separate yards for recess, never the twain shall meet, except for Drama Club, Dancing lessons, and Cookery, all of which were strictly voluntary and chaperoned by teachers. It’s hard sometimes to believe the difference. I believe all it did was to make sex, bigger than it was. lets face it the so called gym slips that girls were made to wear in school to avoid any emphasis of their figures made for a whole branch of the Brit sex industry <image001.png>
        From: mailto:RobynCarr_Chatgroup@yahoogroups.com
        Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 8:45 AM
        To: RobynCarr_Chatgroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:RobynCarr_Chatgroup@yahoogroups.com>
        Subject: Re: [RobynCarr_Chatgroup] Reading

        There is NO way anyone can enjoy every author ~~impossible. I have found a few that completely turned me off. I remember when I decided I was not going to read Danielle Steele anymore ~~~ she became repetitive and all books after the first few seemed as though she just changed the names, but kept the silly plots. Not that fond of a lot of today's authors that seem to rely on sex scenes being pages and pages long ~boring after two pages, so I do something I always found displeasing I skip the boring scene. Some of you may not remember Erskine Caldwell's "God's Little Acre" !!! It was quite a scandal and banned in Boston (not that that was strange!) He wrote a sex scene that was considered scandalous and it all took place on ONE PAGE ~~~(I believe the page number was 56). I remember myself and others asking "have you read page 56?" I'm sure it was 56, but I stand corrected if I'm wrong. LOL Ah youth, wasted on one page that is still fresh in my mind. LOL
        In a message dated 1/21/2015 7:53:09 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, RobynCarr_Chatgroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:RobynCarr_Chatgroup@yahoogroups.com> writes:

        I’ll probably get lynched for saying this, but I don’t like Gabaldon’s books. I’ve tried several times to read the Outlander series and could never get into it. Finally, I just gave up. I won’t even watch the series. ^_^
        From: RobynCarr_Chatgroup@yahoogroups.com<mailto:RobynCarr_Chatgroup@yahoogroups.com> [mailto:RobynCarr_Chatgroup@yahoogroups.com]
        Sent: January 20, 2015 4:10 PM
        To: Jacks Bar
        Subject: [RobynCarr_Chatgroup] Reading

        I wish I had Chrissies patience. She is reading the Outlander series by Diana Gabaldon. I couldn’t even read one page. No matter what size of book you get, paperback or hardcover the print is so tiny I just got totally frustrated.

        No virus found in this message.
        Checked by AVG - www.avg.com<http://www.avg.com/>
        Version: 10.0.1434 / Virus Database: 4257/8469 - Release Date: 01/21/15

      Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.