Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

8225Mabel´s Dream

Expand Messages
  • Leif R. Blom
    Nov 4, 2010
    • 0 Attachment
      Does anyone know something about this tune? Composed by an Ike Smith - who is he
      ?
      Is he the same man Smith, composer of I´m going away just to wear you off my
      mind ?
      Also played by the Oliver Band. Are the tunes new at that time, just composed
      for Oliver ?
      I´ll be grateful for any answers
      Yarel



      ________________________________
      From: EarlyJazzDixie <earlyjazzdixie@...>
      To: RedHotJazz@yahoogroups.com
      Sent: Wed, November 3, 2010 8:20:47 PM
      Subject: RE: [RedHotJazz] Take It Easy (Please)


      Patrice,
      Well said. If there's anything I can do to help please let me know.
      RHJA is invaluable. Period.
      Ric Giorgi

      _____

      From: RedHotJazz@yahoogroups.com [mailto:RedHotJazz@yahoogroups.com] On
      Behalf Of patrice.champarou@...
      Sent: November-03-10 3:11 PM
      To: RedHotJazz@yahoogroups.com
      Subject: Re: [RedHotJazz] Take It Easy

      -----Message d'origine-----
      From: bvkct
      Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 4:10 PM
      To: RedHotJazz@yahoogroups.com <mailto:RedHotJazz%40yahoogroups.com>
      Subject: [RedHotJazz] Take It Easy

      > Take it easy with the criticism of the red hot jazz web site. It is the
      > best anthology of traditional jazz that I have ever seen and is a total
      > marvel. It is a superb teaching tool to show students how jazz developed.

      > Yes, there may be some errors, but so what? Almost all publications
      > have some small errors. I continue to be amazed by the depth and quality
      > of the work.

      First the ADMIN part :

      I suppose you meant "PLEASE take it easy..."
      And since there hasn't been a previous "Take it easy" topic, there CANNOT
      be any "re: Take it Easy".

      Well there is one, from this post on... but this is NOT the Bix forum, the
      archives are organized by threads and a "re:" with an unrelated subject line
      is the most confusing thing one can figure out on a Yahoo group.

      Now for the personal one :

      Everyone acknowledges the huge interest of this monumental work, but
      what you call criticism has nothing negative, on the contrary.
      It only means feeling involved in the ways the website could be improved,
      rather than prosternating in front of a frozen museum piece.

      Some things cannot be altered, even if one wished to, because it would mean
      re-writing the whole site from scratch. Like more searching facilities, the
      possibility of listing numbers according to different criteria, or
      presenting them in another order than alphabetical...
      The truth (and this is no criticism) is that no-one today would consider
      building such a huge website in pure html, without a database, and with such
      deprecated techniques as tables and framesets, also adopting a streaming
      protocol which was already obsolete six years ago - not mentioning the poor
      quality of the
      samples.
      It works, for the time being, and loads much faster than many a crazy
      website with flashy anims or pics, or endless intros. Procedures which are
      just as outdated as the ones I mentioned.
      But for how long, and on how many of today's and tomorrow's browsers, I
      really
      cannot tell.

      I worked on Scott's templates years ago - only three pages I filled in with
      Django stuff - and he was already aware, at the time, that manually
      inserting data and links between the too familiar <td> and </td> tags was
      one of the less rewarding taks one could think of.

      Back to the previous comment, I remember there *were* corrections, applied
      after they had been suggested by some of this group's members.
      They mainly concerned wrong links to soundfiles - and once again, there is
      nothing easier than confusion when you type everything by hand.

      Now, I think the best thing which could happen to the Archives would be a
      bit of interaction - like the possibility of correcting wrong
      information, adding articles and data.
      The only way to keep them, and this group, alive in the next
      future IMO.
      And without prostituting themselves to the current fashions or
      latest gimmicks, pre-war history and music need to adapt to the
      not-so-young-already generations.

      Hoc censeo... etc. etc.

      Patrice

      P.S. Since no-one replied, except for one (rejected) attempt to suggest the
      whole planet to look for the RHJ contact addresses, I will undertake the
      task of getting in touch with whoever is currently in charge of the website,
      and let you know. Not done yet? Sorry, I am not a full-time mod, not even a
      full-time anything. Help and advice gladly accepted, uncontrolled
      interference, no way!

      _____

      No virus found in this message.
      Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
      Version: 10.0.1153 / Virus Database: 424/3234 - Release Date: 11/02/10

      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]







      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
    • Show all 7 messages in this topic