499Re: [RedHotJazz] Some invective
- Jun 16, 2005Eytan,
Let me start out by saying that I love Coon-Sanders, and regard them as one of the consistently hot bands of the jazz age.
But remember that Dick Sudhalter has been an esteemed jazz historian for many decades. I think the disparity here, in my opinion, lies in what each of you consideres to be jazz.
I think Dick comes from the more traditional apporach to what jazz is, and was commenting on Coon-Sanders' lack of high quality jazz soloists; that they didn't have any Buster Baileys, Joe Venutis, et al.
But in my book, they got along very well without them, considering.
emuslan <euslan@...> wrote:
I recently joined the list and I've enjoyed reading the posts. This
is my first posting...
Is anyone familiar with Richard Sudhalter's awkwardly entitled "Lost
Chords: White Jazz Musicians and Their Contributions to Jazz"? I just
looked up Coon-Sanders in the index, to see what this expert on jazz
persons of pallor has to say. And this is what he says:
"The Coon-Sanders Nighthawks, a Kansas City dance band whose `jazz'
novelties had become, at best, a bloodless parody of hot music, had
moved in at the Blackhawk and were broadcasting nightly over WGN.
What passed for `hot' was usually novelty material like "Here Comes
My Ball and Chain" and "Kansas City Kitty" Once in a while a
trumpeter or saxophonist might pop out of the ensemble to 'get off'
for eight bars; but even then the public seemed to recognize no
distinction between the solo efforts of dedicated hot players and
those of journeyman dance band men."
Ouch! I think Sudhalter is way out of line here - anybody with me?
Yahoo! Groups Links
To visit your group on the web, go to:
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Stay in touch with email, IM, photo sharing & more. Check it out!
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>