1423Re: [RedHotJazz] Re: Martha Copeland
- Sep 16, 2005I have Martha Copeland C/D that covers her from l923 to l927 on Docment Records DOCD 5372. She also was on the Radio in the late l920;s like I daid. the improvement in sound in l926 to the Mic. changed the tone and make up of singing so hard to judge. Art She did change name in l929 I am told and that thate is another C/D which is hard to get of her. Art
tommersl <tommersl@...> wrote:I can only think about estimating the age by the vocals. I don't know
wether theres any scientific method to do so, but it wouldn't surprise
me in case there is.
Anyway I think it's possible even by ear to have opinion wether a
vocal is of 60 years old or 30 years old which can be enough for
Martha Copeland's case, especially as her recordings spanned 5 years
between 1923-28. Although not a 100% method but I would have my
personal opinion if I had listened to her vocals.
--- In RedHotJazz@yahoogroups.com, Howard Rye <howard@c...> wrote:
> on 16/9/05 8:26, tommersl at tommersl@y... wrote:
> Which in terms of the present discussion is merely to say that we really
> don't know how likely or otherwise it is that Martha Copeland might have
> been that old. We certainly have no evidence to suggest that she
> have been.
> Howard Rye, 20 Coppermill Lane, London, England, E17 7HB
> Tel/FAX: +44 20 8521 1098
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
Visit your group "RedHotJazz" on the web.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>