1418Re: Martha Copeland
- Sep 16, 2005I can only think about estimating the age by the vocals. I don't know
wether theres any scientific method to do so, but it wouldn't surprise
me in case there is.
Anyway I think it's possible even by ear to have opinion wether a
vocal is of 60 years old or 30 years old which can be enough for
Martha Copeland's case, especially as her recordings spanned 5 years
between 1923-28. Although not a 100% method but I would have my
personal opinion if I had listened to her vocals.
--- In RedHotJazz@yahoogroups.com, Howard Rye <howard@c...> wrote:
> on 16/9/05 8:26, tommersl at tommersl@y... wrote:
> Which in terms of the present discussion is merely to say that we really
> don't know how likely or otherwise it is that Martha Copeland might have
> been that old. We certainly have no evidence to suggest that she
> have been.
> Howard Rye, 20 Coppermill Lane, London, England, E17 7HB
> Tel/FAX: +44 20 8521 1098
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>