Re: [RTrak] RTrak-HAB antenna thoughts
- On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Lynn W. Deffenbaugh (Mr)
> No, he's basing that opinion on the fact that he and I were in an APRS QSOI just checked the RF log at BALDI and dupe log on northwest.aprs2.net
> while the balloon was in flight and there were numerous RF-enabled
> APRSISCE/32 instances well within the balloon's footprint but his was the
> ONLY station report ANY receptions of the balloon.
> In every other HAB I've monitored, even pre-APRSISCE/32's unfiltered RF
> feed, at least a FEW packets would get far enough out to hit a delaying gate
> and show up with a line or two. In this case, every single packet was gated
> by his mobile IGate alone.
(where many of the region's igates connect), and KC7PUC-1 never made
it into any of them either. Very odd, considering the footprint.
It's nice being able to look these things up in RF logs! Of course my
logs aren't nearly as omniscient as Lynn's.
- Ben KF7VZR (got that from a June 22 message) wrote...
> My documentation says nothing about TX audio level...Deviation is important. If it's too high (within limits) nearby stations
> They've both been played with...
may still be able to decode the tones. Distant ones where your signal
is weaker may not be able to. You have probably heard this on a voice
repeater or even on simplex. A distant and noisy station can be copied
via a repeater if he backs off from the mic. If he starts shouting, the
deviation goes up. More energy is outside the passband of the receiver
and eventually the signal is too noisy to copy or the squelch might
even close. If you are simplex, you can try opening your squelch. If
you are on a repeater, you're out of luck. It's the same with packet.
You are better off having the deviation set properly. It can be done
by ear, but a deviation meter or service monitor would be better.
Lacking one, just crank the deviation all of the way up and then
start turning it down. When it starts to sound quieter, turn it down
some more. It will get you in the ballpark, but checking the actual
deviation would be better.
Perhaps you could check the actual deviation before you change
anything. So... could over-deviation explain why only one iGate
73 es cul - Keith VE7GDH
"I may be lost, but I know exactly where I am!"