Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: "... promote the general welfare, ..."

Expand Messages
  • westmiller@aol.com
    From: DGHarrison ... Some excellent responses offered. I d put the basic arguments in four aspects: 1. Original intent [if they
    Message 1 of 7 , Sep 1, 2005
      From: DGHarrison <DGHarrison@...>
      > [preamble] ... defines the people's right to "welfare"
      > from the Federal government.

      Some excellent responses offered. I'd put the basic
      arguments in four aspects:

      1. Original intent [if they respect that], with quotes
      from Madison in Federalist 41:
      2. Legal construction [if they're lawyers], with the
      note of Justice Story that a broad interpretation runs
      contrary to the enumerated powers that follow:
      3. Common sense [if they have any ;o], with the
      distinction between "promoting" conditions that are
      beneficial to all (noting equal treatment under law),
      rather than *providing* for every need (which must
      be infinite).
      4. Moral sense [...] that charitable assistance to
      those who are innocent victims of misfortune cannot
      be coerced, since that destroys any moral value in
      the act.

      I like the last one, for many reasons. The best
      way to disarm opponents is to appeal to their values.
      Government cannot provide *love* for those in need,
      attending to their individual suffering or encouraging
      their efforts; it can only take and give according to
      the cold strictures of law. Nobody in government can
      *care* about individuals.

    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.