Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: [RLC-Action] Printed Materials

Expand Messages
  • Tim Condon
    Not being a bird of prey is a positive? ---Tim Condon
    Message 1 of 47 , Jul 16, 2005
                "Not being a bird of prey" is a positive?  ---Tim Condon

      John Pankratz wrote:
      How about a wild turkey instead of an eagle? It was Franklin's choice 
      for National Bird, and it has the saving grace of not being a bird of prey.
      Chuck Seberg wrote:
      Let's start to design some RLC printed materials -- sign and posters.  What elements should they contain?  I'll start the list and you all fill it in.
      1) Name -- Republican Liberty Caucus
      2) Website -- www.rlc.org
      3) US Flag or sections thereof -- stars on blue field, red/white stripes
      What else?  
      P.S. Once we have a good idea of the images and messages we wish to convey, we'll turn loose the designers
      Yahoo! Groups Links
    • Guy McLendon
      Ray, I have profound respect for the US Constitution . obviously. Indeed, I am working to prepare a streaming web video of my recent presentation that applied
      Message 47 of 47 , Jul 21, 2005



        I have profound respect for the US Constitution … obviously.  Indeed, I am working to prepare a streaming web video of my recent presentation that applied my thinking on the Constitution to the war on drugs.


        However, I certainly do not believe any human-construct to be perfect, or infallible.  There are a number of flaws that need remedy … I could detail a few.  Sadly, the slime in Washington are not interesting in strengthening the Constitution’s primary function … to impose limits on the power officials.  Indeed, they work fervently to strip sidestep & weave around the constraints so long ignored …  The “flaws” that I reference are holes that have allowed the slime in Washington to weave around the intended legal constraints.


        I also have issues with LP purists, and am hopeful that the 2006 LP Platform Team will probably lean more towards practical solutions, and away from purist proposals.  It will be interesting to see whether we can make the LP’s offering more practical.





        From: RLC-Action@yahoogroups.com [mailto: RLC-Action@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Ray Holtorf
        Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 8:23 AM
        To: RLC-Action@yahoogroups.com
        Subject: Re: [RLC-Action] Constitution vs libertarianism


        It's simple Guy,

        I read the Constitution. I noted it's absolute
        perfection - to the extent that the only flaws existed
        after the first 10 Amendments. The ONLY group I saw
        fighting for Constitutional restoration, was

        I obviously have a number of issues with libertarian
        purists - probably the greatest of which is the notion
        that Nations should be borderless, and trade is not a
        function of government. Those are both
        semi-unConstitutional ideals. The Constitution applies
        to specific states, without borders there are no
        states, and no Nation. Trade regulations are clearly
        established in the Constitution.

        I guess I am a purist when it comes to the
        Constitution - smarter men than I, with greater
        vision, created it for my benefit, and they died to
        give it to me. I'm not interested in only enforcing
        the aspects which are part of the libertarian ideal -
        allowing for exceptions to the Constitution to create
        economic recovery from the Great Depression is how we
        got into this mess in the first place...


        --- Guy McLendon <guy@...> wrote:

        > I strongly believe in both the Constitution &
        > individual freedom.  The
        > Constitution is such an important means to an end
        > that libertarians would be
        > well-advised to hold tightly to most features, and
        > use that precious
        > resource as a legal basis for repeal of most onerous
        > laws that are on the
        > books today.  Nonetheless, Ray's remarks are not
        > sufficiently clear for me
        > to make an assessment of value.  If you could
        > clarify your intent, and give
        > an example . that'd help.

        > Guy

        >   _____ 
        > From: RLC-Action@yahoogroups.com
        > [mailto: RLC-Action@yahoogroups.com ] On
        > Behalf Of John David Galt
        > Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2005 7:20 PM
        > To: RLC-Action@yahoogroups.com
        > Subject: Re: [RLC-Action] Printed Materials

        > Ray Holtorf wrote:
        > > I do not know why you couldn't drop "free
        > enterprise,
        > > and individual freedom" in favor of
        > Constitutionally
        > > Limited Government." I don't favor either Free
        > > enterprise or individual freedom if it were ever
        > to be
        > > in violation of the Constitution...
        > I certainly do, and I believe any real libertarian
        > would too.  The
        > Constitution is a means to an end, not the end
        > itself.
        >   _____ 

        > *      Visit your group "RLC-Action
        > <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/RLC-Action> " on the
        > web.
        > *      To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
        >  RLC-Action-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
        > *      Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the
        > Yahoo!
        > <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>  Terms of
        > Service.

        >   _____ 

        Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page

      Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.