Re: [RLC-Action] FW: Alert to Forward
- John Pankratz wrote:
> I understand that we have some issues in common with Moveon.org, theWhat issues would those be? Forever burying the Second
> ACLU and such, but do we really want our RINO and NEOCON enemies in the
> GOP being able to call us allies of those kinds of organizations? Do we
Amendment? Expanding the power of the judiciary branch
to dictate how our military conducts war? Creating "rights"
out of thin air and forcing legislation on citizens by
mere judicial whim? Or would it be selling our nation to
a foreign billionaire who states openly that he wants the
US to be subject to the rule of the UN? I'm trying, but I
can't think of *just one* issue I have in common with
either of those organizations. Not one.
And can we please have a moratorium on abusing neo-con
to mean anybody we don't like? If we're going to use the
term, can we use it--and apply it--correctly? If I wanted
to put up with neo-con being bandied about as if it were
some sort of three-headed hydra, I'd read commondreams.org.
"Why are rising interest rates bad for the economy? When
they go up, don't you get more money?"
--Academic Moron of the Year