RE: [RLC-Action] Re: RNC Chairman
Be honest, I never said that we should endorse someone just for the sake of endorsing someone. Also, if it is hard for you to find conservatives in the Republican Party you must not have looked –check out the Republican Study Committee and if you don’t find any there, then check you definitions. There are both conservatives and libertarians in the RSC. The RSC, The Club For Growth and hopefully soon, the RLC are our best hope for the future. –Geo.
From: RLC-Action@yahoogroups.com [mailto: RLC-Action@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of David Johnson
Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2009 12:27 PM
Subject: RE: [RLC-Action] Re: RNC Chairman
> To sit back and wait for John Galt to offer himself as party chairman or
> any other post is to fall into the rut of the Libertarian Party. WeWhile we should not wait for the perfect chairman candidate to appear,
> should endorse Ken Blackwell. -Geo.
neither should we be endorsing someone just for the sake of endorsing
someone. While it is rare enough to find a conservative in the GOP, we
need to do better and save our endorsements for those who at least
- On Monday 26 January 2009 01:09:23 am DGHarrison wrote:
> I had hoped that we rank and file members might be allowed to express aThis is the classic libertarian failing: trying to trickle down from the top.
> consensus on who we want to lead our party -- but then, perhaps it never
> really was our party.
We can't get a libertarian RNC chairman without first having a significant
number of county and state GOP chairmen. We need to trickle up. We are doing a
bit in this direction, but it is a long term task. We need to learn who are
the fair-weather fiscal conservatives and who are the real free marketers, and
then support the latter at all levels of the GOP organizations.