- I just think this comes down to the ones that would be known to NOT be favorable to us or anyone else in general that isn t in their click . To me, itMessage 1 of 38 , Jan 14, 2009View SourceI just think this comes down to the ones that would be known to NOT be favorable to us or anyone else in general that isn't in their "click". To me, it is more identifying those that should get it. ;)
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:17:09 -0500
Subject: [RLC-Action] Re: RNC ChairmanPosted by: "DGHarrison"> ... Who would the RLC like to see take the gavel at the top of the party?Every RLC member is free to make their own judgment and support their favored candidate. However, the National Board has not identified any of the candidates as being notably sympathetic with our principles or objectives. No RLC members or officers familiar with the candidates has advocated an RLC endorsement.Bill
- ... This is the classic libertarian failing: trying to trickle down from the top. We can t get a libertarian RNC chairman without first having a significantMessage 38 of 38 , Jan 26, 2009View SourceOn Monday 26 January 2009 01:09:23 am DGHarrison wrote:
> I had hoped that we rank and file members might be allowed to express aThis is the classic libertarian failing: trying to trickle down from the top.
> consensus on who we want to lead our party -- but then, perhaps it never
> really was our party.
We can't get a libertarian RNC chairman without first having a significant
number of county and state GOP chairmen. We need to trickle up. We are doing a
bit in this direction, but it is a long term task. We need to learn who are
the fair-weather fiscal conservatives and who are the real free marketers, and
then support the latter at all levels of the GOP organizations.