Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: [RLC-Action] Re: Ron Paul's persona

Expand Messages
  • George Blumel
    Of course I m not talking about you or me --I m referring to the 30% to 40% of the electorate who vote on looks and persona, not substance. ... From: Joe
    Message 1 of 2 , Mar 27, 2007
    • 0 Attachment
      Of course I'm not talking about you or me --I'm referring to the 30% to 40% of the electorate who vote on looks and persona, not substance. 
      ----- Original Message -----
      Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 7:14 AM
      Subject: [RLC-Action] Re: Ron Paul's persona

      I called in and spoke to Ron Paul on the air yesterday during an interview and he certainly sounded serious to me.  I would vote for voting record over persona anyway, but I do not know what you are talking about with his persona.  He does not remind me of Steve Forbes at all, but I don't have any problem with Steve Forbes "persona" either.  I think Ron Paul's personality and charisma are fine - certainly better than Thompson and Gingrich!

      ----- Original Message ----
      From: George Blumel <gblumel@bellsouth. net>
      To: RLC-Action@yahoogro ups.com
      Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 8:43:42 PM
      Subject: Re: [RLC-Action] Re: [RLCHouston] Don Zimmerman on phone calls

      I've been reading the Ron Paul for President correspondence and what I have learned from it is that he is not serious so why should we be?  Altho he has a superb voting record from our view, he ahs drifted more populist in recent years. He does not have the persona to be president --sort of like Steve Forbes. I think Forbes is the most qualified man to be president of all the contenders since Reagan but the personality, looks and charisma are not there --and that is what it takes in this day and age.   Thompson?  Gingrich? Maybe a dark horse comes on the scene later. It is still early.   -Geo.
      .


    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.