18491Re: [ProgAndOther] Re: Some thoughts on NEARFest '03
- Jul 1, 2003On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, biceeichler wrote:
> One thing I forgot to mention in my long, rambling post - the lightI pretty much agree. Camel's set was actually the biggest offender in
> show. It was impressive, but personally I'd rather watch the bands
> than the lights. It seemed like during quiet parts the lights were
> often too low to see much on stage, and during upbeat sections the
> lights were usually going crazy to the point where they were
> distracting from the music. Not to mention the times the lights were
> shining directly out into the audience's eyes, making it impossible to
> watch the bands. Note to whoever was running the lights: Make it
> bright enough to see the bands, but other than that have yourself a
> beer and relax.
this regard, constantly shining the spots in the eyes of the audience.
I did think they did a good job during Anglagard's set, though, where
they did go pretty nuts during the crazier bits, but in a way that I
thought emphasized rather than distracting from what they were doing.
That said, the set where the lights made me the happiest was Magma's,
where they basically just lit up the stage, hit the Magma signal, and
let the music speak for itself.
I also wanted to say, I think the sound was excellent for almost all the
bands. Tunnels was kind of so-so, though, with the vibes too low during
the early part of their set. Anglagard's sound was fantastic, as was
Camel's. Glass Hammer could have used a better mix - particularly at
the end with the chorus, it was hard to make them out.
Noah Lesgold http://nlesgold.freeshell.org/
nlesgold@... AIM: nlesgold ICQ: 132716231
"The only thing that Yes and King Crimson could agree on was that neither
of them liked Genesis." --Bill Bruford
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>