- Hi Steve, On was an ancient city in Egypt. It is generally identified with Heliopolis. Could that be what you are thinking of? However, Cayce s On wasMessage 1 of 10 , Mar 11 4:54 PMView SourceHi Steve,"On" was an ancient city in Egypt. It is generally identified with Heliopolis. Could that be what you are thinking of?However, Cayce's "On" was located in the New World. He does not say specifically where it was located, but he does give us some hints, as you can see from Mike's website.Tom----- Original Message -----From: bigalemc2Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 9:29 AMSubject: [Precolumbian_Inscriptions] Re: cayce on the inka
I could be wrong, but I seem to remember that On was Egypt. It's been maybe 25+ years since I read any of that, but that is my distinct memory.
--- In Precolumbian_ Inscriptions@ yahoogroups. com, "Tom Hebert" <thebert2@...> wrote:
> My understanding from the readings is that Inca were a later
> civilization. Their precursors were the Ohms (Ohlms, Ohum, Ohms, Uhum,
> Ohm, Ohlm). I also believe that this civilization has something to do
> with the land of On, often referred in the readings as "On and Og."
- Hi Steve, What is your interpretation of the record in the rocks. Tom ... From: bigalemc2 To: Precolumbian_Inscriptions@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, MarchMessage 2 of 10 , Mar 12 11:08 AMView SourceHi Steve,What is your interpretation of the "record in the rocks."Tom----- Original Message -----From: bigalemc2Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 9:27 AMSubject: [Precolumbian_Inscriptions] Re: cayce on the inka
Hey, Mike -
Thanks for this Cayce link. I see that the main page has an index to Cayce's readings.
Whether through serendipity, resonance, good karma, or whatever, in the last few days I have been wondering where I might find just such an index.
I guess it is the Universal Mind working its thing.
...I'd been reading on Cayce and his accuracy on peopling the Americas, vs the archaeologists, how his history has become more and more correct over the decades, while pretty much every archaeological paradigm extant in his day that differed from his has been had to be rewritten.
The "record in the rocks" that Cayce talked about can be misunderstood, but only for so long. The Clovis barrier is down, the genetic record is strongly leaning in Cayce's direction, the field of archaeology in the Americas is in tatters (but for the better), and especially haplotype X is showing Cayce was right.
Maybe one of these days an arkie will come along who can see the handwriting on the wall and admit that maybe there was an Atlantis.
I think I'll start holding my breath now.
- They re still harping on that Beringia Land Bridge theory, but interesting studies nonetheless... Indian DNA links to 6 founding mothersMessage 3 of 10 , Mar 13 7:01 PMView Source
They're still harping on that Beringia Land Bridge theory, but interesting studies nonetheless...
Indian DNA links to 6 'founding mothers
Americas Settled 15,000 Years Ago, Study Says
And a new Inca discovery...
Peru archeologists find Inca temple in Andes
I am no scientist, but every time I hear "Bering Land Bridge" my conspiracy alarms go off. I'm not saying that some early settlers came that way - I just think they found their new home already occupied by some very intelligent, advanced cultures!