Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

7408Re: [Precolumbian_Inscriptions] im back - more conjecture to stimulate the intellect

Expand Messages
  • mobydoc
    Oct 1, 2005
        Hy Joan ...Bob...Mike ...et al ;
        What caused that Antarctic Ice melt  was a
        undersea  Volcano ...the Plates are moving all
       over the our World ...does anyone but me get
       those NASA bulletins ...they (nasa) reported the
       undersea movement sometime back ...but hey ...
       you still get people who recon it's the  cars ..planes
      ....cows poos fault ...(that Green House effect )...on that  Ozone depletion [O/K] ...but on the Ice melt ...
        Greenland ...and the Poles...Volcanos folks
      ..or are  they  burping Garlic fumes these days ...^!*
       (ps) The Ice is melting faster than they are telling  you  ...has been for some years now :
                         regards    Pat/Moby
      ----- Original Message -----
      Subject: Re: [Precolumbian_Inscriptions] im back - more conjecture to stimulate the intellect

      A recent study of ice melt in Antarctica,which was in
      the Australian Newspaper,reported that it was melting
      at an even faster rate than the Arctic.It has the
      potential to do far more damage,because a large
      segment of the ice is on land.
      Sleep well!!
      --- mike white <infoplz@...> wrote:

      >    well we got back home last night, and ive about
      > recovered from the 8 day roadtrip to nc.  it was
      > perfect weather, as usual. 
      >    i hope to get thru my backlog of group posts as i
      > can. 
      >    have all read how the arctic ice is receding at
      > an alarming rate, as paul reminded me, at 8% per
      > decade, and maybe gone 125 years after this northern
      > warm cycle began.  no doubt connected to the
      > hurricane increases.  since it would seem that a gas
      > would disperse uniformly according to density layer
      > from the planet, around the globe.  why are
      > hurricanes confined to the northern hemisphere seas,
      > for the most part?  maybe i just dont hear of
      > southern lattitude fierce storms, except in jack
      > london.  he gave some vivid imagery, like a film in
      > my mind.  all of this may point to imbalances in the
      > axis, and masses of earth.  i may be the exception,
      > but im happy about the ice melting, but think we as
      > mankind must consider if we need to help the
      > antarctic ice melt to stay in balance and equipoise
      > on its axis and forces.   maybe scientists could
      > detect imbalances, by careful measurements of
      > gravity, magnetism, and electricty, using identical
      > calibrated instruments, at various points on the
      > globe.  if they all drift further to imbalance, then
      > quakes, and ultimately poleshift might result.  just
      > my feeling on it, with some study. 
      >    the facts discovered by those who investigate
      > geomagnetism of lava strata, and the magnetic dip of
      > ceramic pots - points to a definite conclusion, that
      > there has been magnetic poleshifts in the past.
      > these may happen at the same time as the genetic
      > bottlenecks.  ive read no convincing evidence to
      > show that the magnetic poles of the earth can
      > change, without the planet turning the same degree
      > and position.  they can try models to test the
      > theories.  throughout recorded history as far as i
      > can determine true north of earth moves with
      > magnetic earth.  be sure to put an iron core in the
      > model, and iron in certain mountains on its face. 
      >    it seems reasonable to believe that at least
      > three instances of the bible indicate the earth
      > rolled or fell in space, or upon its axis.   heavens
      > rolled up like a scroll, stars like the northern
      > dragon, do suddenly appear to be thrown to earth, or
      > the horizon actually.  nations and continents are
      > flooded, while seabeds rise in other areas.  must be
      > that great quakes occur during the same event, for
      > the plates to move. 
      >    the oceans bulge at the poles.  i think its
      > generally believed that the mass of water bulging
      > our equator, is in response to the gravity of the
      > sun.  i wonder if the bulge may be in proportion to
      > the mass at the polar icecaps?   somebody should
      > measure if the equator is wandering in proportion to
      > magnetic drift.  early books gave the north pole
      > being on the north of hudson bay? in canada.  its
      > already drifted out to sea toward asia far from
      > canada.  in my opinion it would take a disaster of
      > such biblical proportions as a poleshift, to cause
      > the breaks in recorded history.  history in sketchy
      > prior to about 3,000 bce in the annals of the
      > nations.  earlier events are considered mythology
      > and tale.   duh!   mankind had to have been around
      > for millions of years, but will lower it to 100,000s
      > to those who insist.  5,000 years of history is a
      > great enigma - how could this be?   the dark ages
      > were 1,000 years ago, now we have put men on the
      > moon - why could mankind not have done as much
      > during any of the 1,000 year periods in his long
      > history?  
      >    see, we have passed the lowpoint in man's fall
      > from grace, the old stone age, and have began the
      > upward cycle of the circle.  we dig down a few
      > strata of our new continents, and find evidence to
      > suggest that we have evolved upward, which is true,
      > but certain doctrine suggest that there may be
      > levels far below them in time on portions of the
      > oldest continents, that become more cultured and
      > wise the deeper that is dug. 
      >    i think at ica, paracas, and nazca, we may have
      > artifacts and lands from these earlier times, that
      > have been uplifted, and eroded, to expose the relics
      > from these long distant times.  i still plan to
      > investigate the patina at various sites in south
      > america's andean and west coast regions.  it could
      > be that certain minerals must be in the environment,
      > but its the sun that bakes on the patina.  items
      > that i have with patina display a perfect mirror of
      > the heat of the sun from its east to west southern
      > course, often thickest on the south and southwest
      > for the northern hemisphere.  the north gets little
      > to none normally. 
      >    we do know that the cold humboldt current now
      > flows where a former warm current once did.  we have
      > fossil andean oysters and corals to prove it.  a
      > poleshift does explain this, ive not seen another
      > compelling explanation.  unless velikovsky is proven
      > correct, i accept the mystics report of the last
      > full reversal ca 50,000 bce.  warm water marine
      > species may date to before that time.  the patina
      > would still be heaviest on the same side before and
      > after the earth flips over, but if the magnetic
      > field sets in layers of the patina it may hold the
      > answer about the flip.  it may require a higher
      > temperature to set a field of longterm duration,
      > like lava. 
      > Kind regards,
      > Mike White
      > http://all-ez.com/yahoo-groups.htm

      Do you Yahoo!?
      Yahoo! Photos: Now with unlimited storage
    • Show all 5 messages in this topic