4260Re: [Precolumbian_Inscriptions] Re: Norse Axe from Tor Bay near Canso
- Oct 2, 2003hi terry, alli was aware of the difference, but could not find any info in my search for the tor bay axe. other than it was thought a colonial french jesuit trade item, as you know, and its been lost. as was said, the widow may have it. not knowing the distance between the finds, i thought the magyar rovas rune theory may be a clue to the axe's transliteration.has anyone excavated the so-called 'viking great house' located near one of these finds? it may have been the same group involved in both alleged artifacts. 600 km isnt so far for voyagers who came so far, and are thought to have gone as far as minnesota.regardsmike----- Original Message -----From: Terry J. DeveauSent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 10:18 AMSubject: [Precolumbian_Inscriptions] Re: Norse Axe from Tor Bay near CansoMike, thanks a lot for your post. It is a bit confusing, but the so-
called "Runic Stone" from Yarmouth, Nova Scotia (also called the
Fletcher Stone) is an artefact totally unrelated to the Tor Bay axe;
they were found at opposite ends of the Province (about 600 km apart).
The Fletcher Stone is a very interesting artefact in its own right,
as it does appear to have characters engraved on it, but they are
evidently not Norse runes from a recognizable futhark.
The Tor Bay axe has three so-called "wend runes", and a number of
other designs that were interpreted by Strandwold as "secret runes",
but which appear meerely as geometric patterns to the uninitiated.
Hosted by http://all-ez.com/epigraphy.htm
Group Site : http://www.epigraphyusa.com
To unsubscribe from this group, although we hope
you stay and help us improve. First consider changing to daily digest, or no mail - web only, visit main and edit membership :
if you must leave send an email to:
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>