11761Re: [Precolumbian_Inscriptions] Re: red river
- Jun 9, 2011the red river i discussed was in tx and ok. i believe most of the iron-rich red clay results from meteorites. most burn up passing thru the atmosphere, then the red clay rains down over a wide area. its water dissolved and carried, and ends up on the seafloor.something not discussed, is the radioactive elements. its thought that the core of planets is the source of iron-nickel meteorites. the radioactive elements are the heaviest, so one might expect them also to be present in the core. if true, meteorites may be radioactive.it seems likely that most of these iron-nickel meteorites and red clay may be the result of the planet destroyed between mars and jupiter. so far our lads have not accepted any of that.im inclined to believe that near global earth-changes occurred as a result of a close fly-by of a heavenly body circa 3000 bce. probably seashores changed, ranges of the andes uplifted, and new land appeared in north america about that time.mike----- Original Message -----From: shermSent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 5:06 PMSubject: [Precolumbian_Inscriptions] Re: red river
Hello Mike, When I posted earlier my eye caught this post too.
Is this the Red River that flowes north to Hudson Bay.
A few years ago another reseacher and I noted what may have been outlines of crators in western minnesota. Very large but not deep.
We speculated that a meteorite had hit the glacier.
There is another near Roseau Minnesota too.
What would the effect of a large imact be into a mile or more thick glacier?
We have just returned from a trip across the floor of the Red River Valley in northern Minnesota.
This was also the floor of glacial lake agassiz.
The lower portion of the 'v'shaped lake was in westen minnesota and was 400 miles long and 50 to 100 miles wide.
It is almost perfectly flat.
The Red River had been flooding and it was very RED and muddy looking.
Was the Redness also possibly a result from when the volcano under yellowstone last blew?
And why is that ancient sea floor of lake agassiz so flat?
--- In Precolumbian_Inscriptions@yahoogroups.com, "mike white" <aumsparky@...> wrote:
> a large meteorite was reported found near the headwaters of the red river in the work recently reviewed. i didnt know this before during the discussion of red clay, but it tends to confirm my earlier conclusion of meteorite deposit origin. im no expert on that region, but it seems that red surface clay covers a large area of two states. there must have been a large bombardment of impacts. probably several large meteorites remain to be found. those that hike the wilds should carry a metal detector or magnet. big ones sell for thousands $$$. the burn-up on entry thru the atmosphere turns iron into red clay.
> the moundbuilders found a large meteorite, looked up to ten feet tall, after they set it up as a monument or oracle. it was uncovered in the 19th c.
> these nickel-iron meteorites are thought to come from mars. the surface of the red planet is covered by this red debris, but im wondering if it didnt originate from fragments of the destroyed planet that lay between mars and jupiter. this iron-nickel is typically from a planet's core, and an anomaly on the surface, imho.
> the fact that this red clay is still on the surface of the moon, and not yet covered by other cosmic debris seems to point to a recent event, at least in space and geological time. if the impacts around the red river were from the same event, its shocking how little time ago it was.
> the orbits of mars, earth, and venus are still severely disturbed by a near approach or collision from a mass from space. unlike some others, i think a circular orbit is a better fit with nature's laws, than an elliptical.
> i wonder if it could be responsible for the iridium layer that our lads date to 65 mya. maybe this event happened merely thousands of years ago. its always been a puzzle how a layer of 65 mya could be so near the current surface.
- << Previous post in topic